SGA 9318
In CommitteeSenate
CHARLES C. STANLEY
This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.
How does a bill become law?
- Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
- Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
- Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
- Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
- Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
- Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
AI Analysis
This bill reappoints Charles C. Stanley to the Centralia College Board of Trustees for a new three-year term ending in 2029. It ensures continuity of service on the board without changing board structure or duties.
- Reappoints Charles C. Stanley to the Centralia College Board of Trustees.
- Sets his new term to end on September 30, 2029.
- Appoints him effective January 8, 2026.
Who is affected
- Charles C. Stanley — Charles C. Stanley continues serving as a voting member of the Centralia College Board of Trustees through September 30, 2029.
Who Is Most Affected
As the sole named individual affected, Mr. Stanley gains continued influence over governance and strategic direction at Centralia College for an additional three years. However, this is a continuation of existing authority, not a new empowerment or constraint.
The board’s continuity is maintained, preserving institutional memory and stability in governance. No structural or procedural changes are made, so operational impact is negligible.
Students, faculty, and staff at Centralia College experience no direct change in services, rights, or costs as a result of this reappointment alone. Any indirect effects would depend on Mr. Stanley’s future decisions, which are unknown and speculative.
Local residents in the college’s service area (e.g., Lewis and Thurston counties) may benefit indirectly from stable governance, but this bill does not alter funding, programs, or access — only continuity of current leadership. No measurable economic or service impact is inherent in the reappointment itself.
State government operations are unaffected, as this is a routine administrative reappointment with no fiscal, regulatory, or legislative implications. No new costs or savings are generated.