SGA 9275
In CommitteeSenate
DENISE L. STIFFARM
This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.
How does a bill become law?
- Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
- Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
- Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
- Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
- Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
- Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
AI Analysis
This bill formally appoints Denise L. Stiffarm to the University of Washington Board of Regents for a six-year term. The appointment is effective immediately upon signing, and she will serve until the end of September 2031.
- Appoints Denise L. Stiffarm as a member of the University of Washington Board of Regents
- Sets the term to begin on October 14, 2025, and end on September 30, 2031
- Fills a vacancy on the board created by the expiration of a prior appointment
Who is affected
- University of Washington Board of Regents — The University of Washington Board of Regents governs the state's flagship public university; this appointment adds one member to the board.
Who Is Most Affected
As the sole appointee, Stiffarm gains formal authority to participate in governance of Washington’s flagship public university, including budget approvals, tuition setting, and strategic direction. However, this is a governance role — not a direct economic benefit — and does not alter her personal financial position unless she receives compensation (which this bill does not address).
The Board of Regents sets tuition, approves budgets, and oversees capital projects for UW. This appointment may influence long-term decisions on affordability, program expansion, or campus development — but the bill itself does not specify Stiffarm’s policy positions, so impacts are speculative and indirect.
As a public university, UW’s decisions affect state funding allocations, research contracts, and economic development initiatives across Washington. A new regent could shift priorities (e.g., toward STEM, rural outreach, or Indigenous studies), but since this is a routine appointment to fill a vacancy, no major policy shift is implied.
This appointment does not create new regulatory burdens, licensing requirements, or operational changes for private or public employers. It has no direct effect on business operations, hiring, or compliance costs.
This is a procedural, non-substantive legislative action — renaming or reappointing does not change laws, funding, or rights. No legal standing, civil liberties, or public safety implications are altered.