SGA 9196
In CommitteeSenate
MEGHAN B. KELLY-STALLINGS
This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.
How does a bill become law?
- Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
- Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
- Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
- Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
- Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
- Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
AI Analysis
This bill formally appoints Meghan B. Kelly-Stallings to the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board, a state board that reviews certain long-term prison sentences. Her appointment is for a fixed term ending in April 2027.
- Appoints Meghan B. Kelly-Stallings to the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board
- Sets the term of service from February 03, 2025, to April 15, 2027
Who is affected
- Meghan B. Kelly-Stallings — This bill appoints Meghan B. Kelly-Stallings as a member of the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board.
Who Is Most Affected
This individual gains formal appointment to a state board with authority to review long-term prison sentences — a position of public trust and influence over criminal justice outcomes. However, the role is non-partisan, advisory, and limited in scope; it does not confer personal financial gain or broad societal power.
The Indeterminate Sentence Review Board evaluates whether certain long-term inmates should have their sentences modified or reduced based on rehabilitation and risk of reoffending. This appointment helps ensure board continuity and expertise, supporting fair, individualized sentencing reviews — but only affects a narrow subset of incarcerated people (those with indeterminate sentences, primarily from before 2018 sentencing reforms).
Families and loved ones of incarcerated individuals may benefit indirectly if the board’s work leads to earlier release for rehabilitated individuals, reducing family separation and economic hardship. However, this is a marginal effect — the bill itself does not change eligibility criteria or procedures, only fills a vacancy.
Local governments (e.g., counties, correctional facilities) may experience minor operational impacts if the board’s decisions lead to changes in parole or release planning — but this bill does not alter board authority or caseload expectations, so effects are negligible.
State government operations are unaffected in terms of budget or staffing — this is a routine personnel appointment. No new regulatory or administrative burdens are created.