SGA 9147
In CommitteeSenate
GABRIEL VERDUGO
This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.
How does a bill become law?
- Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
- Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
- Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
- Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
- Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
- Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
AI Analysis
This bill formally appoints Gabriel Verdugo to the Pollution Control/Shorelines Hearings Board, a state body that hears appeals on environmental permits and shoreline development decisions. His six-year term begins on August 16, 2024, and ends on June 30, 2030.
- Appoints Gabriel Verdugo as a member of the Pollution Control/Shorelines Hearings Board.
- Sets the term of service from August 16, 2024, to June 30, 2030.
- The appointment is made by the Governor (implied by the term 'appointed').
Who is affected
- Gabriel Verdugo — The individual named, Gabriel Verdugo, is appointed to serve as a member of the Pollution Control/Shorelines Hearings Board.
- Environmental permit applicants and shoreline developers — Residents and businesses involved in environmental permitting, shoreline development, or pollution control matters may be affected by decisions made by this board during Verdugo’s term.
Who Is Most Affected
As the appointee, Verdugo gains a six-year paid public service position with authority over environmental permitting and shoreline development appeals. This is a professional appointment with no direct financial cost or benefit to the public beyond standard state compensation.
This appointment may influence the board’s composition and decision-making on environmental permits and shoreline development appeals. However, since the bill only appoints one member and does not change board authority, procedures, or funding, the practical impact on permit applicants or developers is speculative and likely negligible in isolation.
The general public may benefit indirectly if Verdugo’s expertise improves the consistency or rigor of environmental review, but the bill itself contains no mechanism to ensure this outcome. Conversely, if his views favor development over protection, some environmental or community groups may be concerned—but the bill does not specify his stance or mandate any shift in policy.
State agencies (e.g., Department of Ecology, Department of Fish and Wildlife) that interact with the board may experience minor procedural changes depending on Verdugo’s approach, but the board’s jurisdiction and statutory duties remain unchanged by this bill.
Local governments (counties, cities) that issue shoreline permits and face appeals may see no direct change, as the bill does not alter appeal timelines, standards of review, or local authority. Any impact would be indirect and highly speculative.