Skip to main content

SGA 9125

In Committee

Senate

COREY M. MCNALLY

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 14, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: S Term expired

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill appoints Corey M. McNally to the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board for a partial term. The board reviews certain long-term prison sentences to determine whether they should be reduced.

  • Appoints Corey M. McNally as a member of the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board
  • Sets the term of appointment to begin on August 1, 2024, and end on April 15, 2025

Who is affected

  • Indeterminate Sentence Review Board members and applicantsThis appointment ensures the board has the required number of members to function properly and review certain long-term prison sentences.
Effective: 2024-08-01
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 10:03 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (2)
  • By restoring full board capacity, the appointment enables timely and thorough review of indeterminate sentences—particularly for individuals who may have been sentenced decades ago under now-outdated sentencing norms—potentially leading to reduced sentences for those who have demonstrated rehabilitation, reducing long-term incarceration costs and promoting reintegration.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: SGA 9125, Appointments Section
  • The ISRB provides a constitutionally mandated mechanism for reviewing whether continued incarceration remains justified after decades of imprisonment; ensuring the board functions properly supports due process and proportional punishment, especially for individuals serving life-with-parole-eligibility sentences who may have aged out of high-risk behavior profiles.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: SGA 9125, Appointments Section
Potential Concerns (1)
  • This bill fills a vacancy on the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB), ensuring the board maintains quorum and can lawfully convene and issue binding decisions on sentence reviews. Without this appointment, the board may be unable to meet statutory requirements for full membership, potentially delaying or blocking sentence review hearings for incarcerated individuals.

    Local GovernmentRef: SGA 9125, Appointments Section

Who Is Most Affected

Indeterminate Sentence Review Board members and applicantsMixed Impact

ISRB members and applicants benefit from a fully staffed board, which improves predictability and reduces delays in case reviews; however, individual applicants’ outcomes depend on board composition and discretion, so impact is mixed.

Incarcerated individuals serving long-term indeterminate sentencesPositive Impact

Currently incarcerated individuals serving indeterminate sentences (e.g., life with parole eligibility after 20+ years) benefit from timely case reviews, but only if the board functions as intended—delays due to vacancies can prolong incarceration without rehabilitative review.

Families of incarcerated individualsPositive Impact

Families of incarcerated individuals benefit from the possibility of earlier release or sentence reduction, but may experience stress during review delays caused by board vacancies.

Washington State Department of CorrectionsPositive Impact

State correctional agencies benefit from reduced long-term incarceration costs and improved resource allocation if sentence reviews result in releases, but face no direct cost or burden from this appointment.

Prosecutors and courtsMixed Impact

Prosecutorial and judicial resources are not directly affected by this appointment, as ISRB decisions are administrative reviews—not new trials—but timely reviews may reduce court appeals or habeas petitions over procedural delays.