SGA 9120
In CommitteeSenate
DAVID SCHUMACHER
This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.
How does a bill become law?
- Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
- Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
- Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
- Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
- Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
- Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
AI Analysis
This bill reappoints David Schumacher to the University of Washington Board of Regents for a full six-year term ending in 2030. As a regent, he will help govern the state’s flagship public research university.
- Reappoints David Schumacher to the University of Washington Board of Regents.
- Sets the term length to six years, ending on September 30, 2030.
- Maintains his current role as a student representative on the board (as previously appointed).
Who is affected
- University of Washington students, faculty, and staff — This appointment ensures continued representation of the University of Washington student body and faculty on the Board of Regents, influencing academic policies, budgets, and campus operations.
Who Is Most Affected
As a current student representative on the board, Schumacher provides direct student voice in governance decisions affecting tuition, academic programs, and campus services. This reappointment maintains continuity in student representation, but since the board has only one student regent among 12 total members, influence is limited and often symbolic without structural voting power to override faculty/staff regents or gubernatorial appointees.
Faculty and staff may benefit from consistent representation if Schumacher advocates for shared governance and academic labor issues, but as a student regent, his mandate is focused on student concerns—not broader faculty/staff employment conditions, benefits, or academic freedom protections. No material change in their governance influence is expected.
State taxpayers benefit from stable, experienced leadership on the board, which oversees a $8B+ annual budget and major research enterprise. However, this reappointment has no direct fiscal impact and does not alter accountability mechanisms or transparency standards for regents.
As a regent, Schumacher participates in decisions on tuition, capital projects, and endowment management—issues that affect enrollment, housing affordability, and local economies near campus. But since he represents only one student voice on a 12-member board, his individual influence on major financial or strategic decisions remains constrained.
This reappointment does not alter the board’s composition in a way that shifts power toward or away from any particular political or ideological bloc. Schumacher’s prior service suggests continuity, but no evidence suggests he will change the board’s existing policy trajectory.