Skip to main content
← Back to bills

SGA 9107

In Committee

Senate

JAMES D. OSWALD

  1. Introduced (completed)
  2. 2
    Committee (current stage)
  3. 3
    Floor Vote (not started)
  4. 4
    Opposite Chamber (not started)
  5. 5
    Governor (not started)
  6. 6
    Signed (not started)

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 14, 2025
Last Action: April 27, 2025
Status: S Confirmed

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill formally appoints James D. Oswald to serve on the Public Disclosure Commission, the state agency that oversees campaign finance, lobbying, and government ethics. His five-year term begins immediately upon appointment and ends at the end of 2028.

  • Appoints James D. Oswald as a member of the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC).
  • Sets the term of office from April 1, 2024, to December 31, 2028.

Who is affected

  • Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) staff and commissioners — The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) is the state agency responsible for enforcing Washington's campaign finance, lobbying, and conflict-of-interest laws. Adding a new member helps ensure the commission can carry out its oversight duties.
  • Washington voters and residents — Voters and Washington residents who participate in elections or interact with government officials benefit from stronger transparency and accountability in political spending and conduct.
  • Political candidates, campaigns, and lobbyists — Candidates, political committees, and lobbyists must comply with PDC rules; a fully staffed commission helps ensure consistent enforcement.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026, 10:02 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (3)
  • Filling a vacancy on the PDC ensures the commission can function at full capacity to enforce campaign finance, lobbying, and ethics rules — supporting consistent oversight of political activity.

    Local GovernmentRef: Appoints James D. Oswald as a Member of the Public Disclosure Commission
  • A fully staffed PDC improves enforcement of transparency and accountability in government, which helps deter corruption and enhances public trust in electoral and governmental processes.

    Public SafetyLean peopleRef: Appoints James D. Oswald as a Member of the Public Disclosure Commission
  • Robust PDC enforcement helps protect the integrity of elections and the public’s right to know how money influences politics — reinforcing democratic participation and informed civic engagement.

    Rights & LibertiesLean peopleRef: Appoints James D. Oswald as a Member of the Public Disclosure Commission

Who Is Most Affected

  • Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) staff and commissionersPositive Impact

    Commission members and staff benefit from having a full complement of leadership, improving operational capacity and reducing delays in enforcement and investigations.

  • Washington voters and residentsPositive Impact

    Voters benefit from more consistent enforcement of disclosure rules and ethics laws, increasing transparency around political spending and official conduct.

  • Political candidates, campaigns, and lobbyistsMixed Impact

    Candidates, campaigns, and lobbyists benefit from clearer, more consistent enforcement of rules — though this also means more predictable compliance expectations rather than arbitrary or under-resourced enforcement.

  • Journalists and government watchdogsPositive Impact

    Media and watchdog organizations rely on PDC data and enforcement to hold officials accountable; a fully staffed commission improves data quality and responsiveness.

  • General public / taxpayersMixed Impact

    This appointment has no direct fiscal impact and does not alter the commission’s authority — so while Oswald’s background (former PDC chair, attorney with government ethics experience) may influence enforcement priorities, the bill itself does not specify ideological or policy shifts.