SGA 9014
In CommitteeSenate
MARIKO K. DOERNER
This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.
How does a bill become law?
- Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
- Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
- Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
- Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
- Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
- Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
AI Analysis
This bill formally appoints Mariko K. Doerner to the Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees for a term ending September 30, 2025. The appointment ensures continued community representation in governing the college’s policies and operations.
- Appoints Mariko K. Doerner as a member of the Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees.
- Sets the term of service from January 15, 2021, to September 30, 2025.
- Fills a vacancy on the board, as authorized under state law for community college boards.
Who is affected
- Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees — This appointment ensures continued representation for Skagit County residents on the college board, including oversight of college operations, budget approval, and strategic planning.
- Skagit Valley College community (students, faculty, staff) — Students, faculty, and staff at Skagit Valley College may be affected indirectly through board decisions on tuition, academic programs, and campus services.
- Skagit County residents — Local taxpayers and residents of Skagit County who benefit from public higher education services and workforce training programs offered by the college.
Pro/Con Analysis
Potential Benefits (1)
The appointment ensures continuity and stability in governance at Skagit Valley College, supporting consistent oversight of academic programs, budgeting, and strategic planning—critical for long-term institutional health.
Local GovernmentRef: Section 1
Potential Concerns (1)
This bill formalizes an appointment already made in January 2021, providing no new policy, funding, or structural change—merely administrative ratification of an existing governance decision.
Local GovernmentRef: Section 1
Who Is Most Affected
As the appointee, Mariko K. Doerner gains formal authority to vote on college policies, budgets, and leadership hires; her influence depends on board dynamics and committee assignments, but the role carries significant decision-making power over local higher education.
Students may benefit from stable leadership and potentially responsive academic programming, but as individuals they have no direct say in board appointments and bear no cost or benefit directly tied to this specific bill.
Faculty and staff may experience continuity in institutional direction, but this bill does not alter contracts, compensation, or working conditions directly.
Local taxpayers benefit from stable public higher education delivery, but this bill does not change funding levels, tax levies, or service scope—it only confirms a governance role.
The board gains legitimacy and continuity in its statutory function, but the appointment does not expand its authority, budget, or responsibilities beyond existing legal parameters.