Skip to main content

SR 8633

In Committee

Senate

Forest products workforce

Honoring the workforce of forest products businesses.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Last Action: April 9, 2025
Status: S Adopted

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This resolution formally recognizes and honors Washington’s forest products industry and workforce for their economic, environmental, and community contributions. It emphasizes the industry’s role in supporting jobs, rural economies, climate resilience, and sustainable forestry, and designates April 9, 2025, as Washington Forest Products Day at the legislature.

  • Establishes April 9, 2025, as Washington Forest Products Day at the legislature to recognize industry contributions.
  • Highlights the industry’s role in supporting over 42,000 direct jobs and 60,000 related jobs, with annual wages totaling nearly $6 billion.
  • Acknowledges the sector’s contributions to climate change mitigation, including carbon storage in wood products and forest health efforts.
  • Recognizes the industry’s role in restoring fish habitat—9,200 fish passage barriers removed and 6,500 miles of fish habitat reopened since 2001.
  • Affirms the importance of mills as essential businesses that supply vital paper products and serve as major employers and taxpayers in rural counties, with a 3:1 job multiplier.

Who is affected

  • Forest products workers and related professionalsWorkers in logging, milling, transportation, and related roles who rely on the forest products industry for family-wage employment.
  • Rural communities dependent on forest sector jobsCommunities in rural areas where mills and logging operations are major employers and tax revenue sources, supporting services like schools, police, and fire departments.
  • Forest landownersState and private forest landowners who manage forests under regulations like the Forest and Fish Law and contribute to habitat restoration and carbon storage.
  • State and local governmentsLocal and state governments that benefit from tax revenue and economic activity generated by the forest products industry.
Effective: April 9, 2025
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 9:58 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Formal legislative recognition of the forest products industry may increase public and political support for policies that sustain rural economies, potentially leading to more favorable regulatory or funding decisions for rural infrastructure, schools, and emergency services that rely on industry tax revenue.

    Local GovernmentRef: Preamble & whereas clauses (e.g., WHEREAS, Washington Forest Products Day... April 9, 2025)
  • Highlighting the industry’s role in wildfire risk reduction and forest health may encourage greater investment in proactive forest management, which can reduce catastrophic wildfire risk for rural communities.

    Public SafetyRef: WHEREAS, April 9, 2025, designated as Washington Forest Products Day at the legislature
  • Public recognition of habitat restoration efforts may reinforce accountability and momentum for continued environmental stewardship by forest landowners, supporting long-term ecosystem health and salmon recovery.

    EnvironmentRef: WHEREAS, 9,200 fish passage barriers removed and 6,500 miles of fish habitat reopened since 2001
  • Formal acknowledgment of the industry’s economic scale may improve public perception and political standing, potentially aiding future efforts to attract investment or resist restrictive regulations that could threaten jobs.

    Business & EmploymentRef: WHEREAS, 42,000 direct + 60,000 related jobs, $6B in wages
  • Elevating the profile of mills as essential infrastructure may strengthen arguments for maintaining or expanding public infrastructure support (e.g., broadband, roads, utilities) in rural areas where mills operate.

    Local GovernmentRef: WHEREAS, Mills are essential businesses... providing 7,500 predominantly union-backed, family-wage jobs in rural communities with 3:1 job multiplier

Who Is Most Affected

Forest products workers and related professionalsMixed Impact

Workers in this sector may benefit from increased public visibility and political goodwill, which could help protect jobs during policy debates over logging, milling, or environmental regulations. However, the resolution itself does not change wages, safety standards, or job security.

Rural communities dependent on forest sector jobsMixed Impact

Rural communities may benefit from reinforced political support for the industry, potentially helping to preserve local tax bases and jobs. However, the resolution has no direct fiscal impact and does not address underlying economic vulnerabilities (e.g., market volatility, automation, resource depletion).

Forest landownersMixed Impact

Forest landowners (especially large private or corporate owners) may benefit from enhanced public legitimacy for their operations, but the resolution does not alter property rights, regulatory burdens, or conservation requirements.

State and local governmentsPositive Impact

Local governments in rural counties may benefit from continued political support for the industry, which helps sustain their largest employers and tax contributors. State government benefits from positive framing of a major export sector, but no new funding or authority is granted.

Sponsors

Senator Chapman(Democrat)District 24Primary
Senator Krishnadasan(Democrat)District 26Secondary
Senator Saldaña(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Senator Shewmake(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Senator Valdez(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Senator Warnick(Republican)District 13Secondary
Senator Wilson(Republican)District 19Secondary
Senator King(Republican)District 14Secondary
Senator MacEwen(Republican)District 35Secondary
Senator Muzzall(Republican)District 10Secondary
Senator Short(Republican)District 7Secondary
Senator Torres(Republican)District 15Secondary
Senator Schoesler(Republican)District 9Secondary
Senator Boehnke(Republican)District 8Secondary
Senator Harris(Republican)District 17Secondary
Senator Lovelett(Democrat)District 40Secondary
Senator Wagoner(Republican)District 39Secondary
Senator Fortunato(Republican)District 31Secondary
Senator Hasegawa(Democrat)District 11Secondary