Skip to main content

SR 8619

In Committee

Senate

Bloody Sunday

Remembering Bloody Sunday.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Last Action: March 7, 2025
Status: S Adopted

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This resolution commemorates the 60th anniversary of Bloody Sunday—the 1965 voting rights march in Selma, Alabama—and honors the activists who risked their lives to demand equal access to the ballot. It affirms Washington State’s commitment to racial justice and voting rights, urging citizens to reflect on the struggle for civil rights and continue working toward equality.

  • Formally recognizes the 60th anniversary of Bloody Sunday on March 7, 2025.
  • Honors key figures involved in the Selma marches, including Amelia Boynton Robinson, James Orange, Jimmie Lee Jackson, John Lewis, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
  • Acknowledges the violent suppression of Black voters in Alabama, including the role of Alabama state troopers and local officials in the 1965 attacks.
  • Highlights how the events of Bloody Sunday helped galvanize national support for the Voting Rights Act of 1965, signed into law on August 6, 1965.
  • Encourages all Washington residents to remember and reflect on the sacrifices made during the civil rights movement to advance equality and voting rights.

Who is affected

  • Black Washington residents and descendants of civil rights activistsThe resolution honors the legacy of Black civil rights activists and acknowledges historical violence against Black citizens, reinforcing the state's commitment to racial equity and voting rights.
  • Voting rights advocates and community organizersThe resolution encourages civic engagement and education about voting rights history, supporting efforts to increase voter participation and awareness.
  • Educators and studentsThe resolution serves as an educational tool for schools, libraries, and public agencies to teach about civil rights history and the importance of nonviolent protest.
  • State and local election officialsThe resolution reinforces the state’s commitment to upholding the Voting Rights Act principles, which may influence future policy and enforcement priorities.
Effective: March 7, 2025
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 20, 2026 at 3:04 AM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • The resolution affirms Washington State’s commitment to racial justice and voting rights, reinforcing a societal stance against voter suppression and state-sanctioned violence. While symbolic, such resolutions can support community trust in government institutions and reduce perceptions of systemic bias in law enforcement.

    Public SafetyRef: Preamble and WHEREAS clauses 1–14, 16–20
  • The resolution serves as an educational resource for schools, libraries, and civic organizations to teach about civil rights history, nonviolent protest, and the importance of voting rights. It supports curriculum development and public awareness without imposing new mandates or costs.

    EducationRef: WHEREAS clauses 1, 2, 15, 21
  • By formally recognizing the 60th anniversary of Bloody Sunday and honoring civil rights martyrs, the resolution strengthens symbolic recognition of the historical struggle for equal access to the ballot. This may encourage civic participation and reinforce democratic norms, especially among historically disenfranchised communities.

    Rights & LibertiesRef: WHEREAS clause 21 (‘We urge all citizens…’)
  • The resolution documents state-sponsored violence against peaceful protesters and affirms the state’s rejection of such tactics. While symbolic, this historical acknowledgment may support accountability culture and inform training for law enforcement on de-escalation and constitutional rights.

    Public SafetyRef: WHEREAS clauses 3–14
  • The resolution does not impose new regulatory burdens, licensing requirements, or compliance costs on businesses. It may indirectly support workforce diversity and inclusion initiatives by reinforcing values of equity, but no direct economic impact is created.

    Business & EmploymentRef: WHEREAS clause 21

Who Is Most Affected

Black Washington residents and descendants of civil rights activistsPositive Impact

Black Washington residents—especially older generations and descendants of civil rights activists—may experience increased sense of recognition, validation, and inclusion. While the resolution has no direct material impact, it may bolster trust in state institutions and affirm historical legitimacy of their struggles.

Voting rights advocates and community organizersPositive Impact

Voting rights advocates and community organizers gain a formal, state-endorsed platform to amplify civic education and mobilization efforts. The resolution may bolster grant applications, public programming, and coalition-building, though no new funding is allocated.

Educators and studentsPositive Impact

Educators and students gain a ready-made, nonpartisan resource for teaching civil rights history. The resolution supports lesson planning and civic engagement activities without requiring new curriculum development or teacher training.

State and local election officialsMixed Impact

State and local election officials may use the resolution to reinforce commitments to equitable election administration and voter access. However, since it is non-binding, it does not create new legal obligations or enforcement mechanisms.

Sponsors

Senator Lovick(Democrat)District 44Primary
Senator Muzzall(Republican)District 10Secondary
Senator Boehnke(Republican)District 8Secondary
Senator Cleveland(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Senator Dhingra(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Senator Hansen(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Senator Hasegawa(Democrat)District 11Secondary
Senator Liias(Democrat)District 21Secondary
Senator Nobles(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Senator Orwall(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Senator Pedersen(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Senator Shewmake(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Senator Stanford(Democrat)District 1Secondary
Senator Valdez(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Senator Wilson(Republican)District 19Secondary
Senator Cortes(Democrat)District 18Secondary
Senator King(Republican)District 14Secondary
Senator Ramos(Democrat)District 5Secondary
Senator Salomon(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Senator Slatter(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Senator Trudeau(Democrat)District 27Secondary
Senator Conway(Democrat)District 29Secondary
Senator Fortunato(Republican)District 31Secondary
Senator Kauffman(Democrat)District 47Secondary
Senator Torres(Republican)District 15Secondary
Senator Wagoner(Republican)District 39Secondary