Skip to main content

SB 6298

In Committee

Senate

Public works/made in US

Concerning products manufactured in the United States for the purposes of public works projects.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 22, 2026
Last Action: January 23, 2026
Status: S State Gov/Trib
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill requires that iron, steel, aluminum, and manufactured products used in most large public works projects in Washington must be made in the United States, with a 55% domestic component cost threshold for other manufactured goods. It adds transparency and accountability by requiring public notice for waivers and penalties for false 'Made in America' claims, and establishes a state-level arbitration process for related disputes.

  • Requires that iron, steel, aluminum, and manufactured products used in public works projects over $500,000 funded by state capital budgets or financing contracts must be manufactured in the United States.
  • Defines 'manufactured in the United States' to mean: (a) for iron/steel, all processing occurs in the U.S.; and (b) for other manufactured products, at least 55% of component costs must come from U.S.-sourced materials.
  • Allows the Office of Financial Management, school district superintendents, or municipal leaders to waive the requirement if: (i) it’s against public interest, (ii) U.S.-made materials aren’t available in sufficient quantity/quality, or (iii) domestic content would raise project costs by more than 25% — but only after 30 days of public notice and comment.
  • Prohibits contractors from knowingly labeling or representing U.S.-made products as such if they are not — and makes them ineligible for future public contracts if found in violation.
  • Requires contracts to include a clause that disputes over product origin labeling or misrepresentation are resolved by binding arbitration through the Department of Labor and Industries.
  • Clarifies that 'manufactured product' excludes iron, steel, aluminum, and certain construction materials already covered under federal 'Buy American' rules.

Who is affected

  • Public agencies and local governmentsPublic agencies (like cities, counties, school districts, and port districts) that award contracts for public works projects over $500,000 funded by state capital budgets or financing contracts must now ensure iron, steel, aluminum, and manufactured products used in those projects are made in the U.S., unless a waiver applies.
  • Construction contractors and suppliersContractors bidding on or performing public works projects must ensure products they supply meet the 'Made in the U.S.' standard or risk being barred from future public contracts if they knowingly mislabel or misrepresent product origin.
  • Domestic manufacturers and material suppliersBusinesses that produce or supply iron, steel, aluminum, or manufactured goods must be able to document that their products meet the domestic content threshold (≥55% U.S.-sourced components) to be eligible for public works contracts.
  • State agencies (e.g., Office of Financial Management, Department of Labor and Industries)The Office of Financial Management, Department of Labor and Industries, and other state agencies gain new responsibilities for waiving requirements (with public notice), enforcing compliance, and resolving disputes.
Effective: July 1, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill may increase costs for public works projects due to potentially higher prices for U.S.-made materials, unless waivers are used. The state may incur administrative costs for oversight, waiver reviews, and dispute resolution through the Department of Labor and Industries.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 9:51 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for concerns

Potential Benefits (4)
  • Supports domestic manufacturing jobs by requiring U.S.-sourced materials for public works—potentially boosting demand for Washington-based suppliers of iron, steel, aluminum, and components meeting the 55% threshold, especially for mid-sized manufacturers with established domestic supply chains.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1), Sec. 3(1)
  • Increases accountability through public waiver justifications and penalties for false 'Made in America' claims, reducing risk of substandard or mislabeled materials entering public infrastructure—enhancing long-term safety and durability of roads, bridges, and schools.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(2)(b)(ii), Sec. 3(1)
  • Requires transparency in waiver decisions and public comment periods, giving communities a voice in when and why imported materials are used—strengthening democratic oversight of public spending.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 2(2)(a)(ii), Sec. 2(2)(b)(i)
  • May reduce transportation emissions by favoring domestically produced materials—though this benefit is modest, as most U.S.-made materials still travel significant distances within the country, and the bill does not include sustainability standards.

    EnvironmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 2(1)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Increases project costs for public works due to potentially higher-priced U.S.-sourced materials, especially when domestic supply is limited or when cost increases exceed 25%—a threshold that may trigger waivers, undermining the policy’s intent.

    FinancialLean industryRef: Sec. 2(1), Sec. 2(2)(a)(iii)
  • Adds administrative burden on local governments (e.g., school districts, cities) to justify waivers publicly and manage 30-day comment periods—costs that disproportionately fall on small or under-resourced jurisdictions.

    Local GovernmentIndustryRef: Sec. 2(2)(a)(ii), Sec. 2(2)(b)(i)
  • Excludes contractors who rely on imported components—even if competitively priced—unless they meet the 55% U.S. component threshold, potentially reducing competition and favoring larger firms with domestic supply chains over smaller, agile subcontractors.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 3(1)
  • Mandates binding arbitration through L&I for origin disputes, which may delay project timelines and increase legal complexity—potentially compromising timely public infrastructure delivery, especially in time-sensitive projects like bridge repairs or school construction.

    Public SafetyLean industryRef: Sec. 3(2)
  • The 25% cost increase waiver threshold is high enough that most projects will not trigger it—but when they do, waivers are likely to be granted, weakening the domestic content mandate in practice and disproportionately benefiting large contractors with deeper margins who can absorb cost overruns or negotiate exemptions.

    FinancialIndustryRef: Sec. 2(2)(a)(iii)

Who Is Most Affected

Local governments and school districtsMixed Impact

Local governments (e.g., cities, school districts) face higher procurement costs and added administrative work to process waivers and verify compliance—especially burdensome for smaller jurisdictions without legal or procurement staff. However, they gain transparency tools and public oversight mechanisms.

Domestic manufacturers and material suppliersPositive Impact

Mid-sized domestic manufacturers (e.g., steel fabricators, aluminum component makers) benefit from guaranteed demand in public projects, but only if they meet the 55% U.S. component threshold—some may struggle with supply chain reconfiguration. Large national suppliers with existing domestic networks gain more than small or import-dependent firms.

Construction contractors and suppliersMixed Impact

Contractors (especially small- and mid-sized) face higher material costs and compliance burdens; those without U.S.-sourced supply chains may be priced out or excluded. Large national contractors with diversified domestic sourcing can absorb costs more easily and may benefit from reduced competition.

State agencies (OFM, L&I, etc.)Mixed Impact

State agencies (e.g., OFM, L&I) gain new administrative and enforcement responsibilities—costs that may strain budgets. However, they gain stronger tools to ensure quality and compliance in public infrastructure, supporting long-term public trust.

General public / taxpayersMixed Impact

General public benefits from potentially safer, longer-lasting infrastructure and support for local jobs—but may face higher taxes or fees if project cost overruns require additional public funding. Low- and middle-income residents benefit most if local hiring and sourcing follow, but this bill does not include wage or equity provisions.

Sponsors

Senator Holy(Republican)District 6Primary
Senator Boehnke(Republican)District 8Secondary
Senator Dozier(Republican)District 16Secondary
Senator Riccelli(Democrat)District 3Secondary
Senator Christian(Republican)District 4Secondary
Senator Short(Republican)District 7Secondary