Skip to main content

SB 6156

In Committee

Senate

Plastics/recycled content

Concerning postconsumer recycled content requirements for plastic products.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 14, 2026
Last Action: January 15, 2026
Status: S Environment, E
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill expands Washington’s recycled content requirements to include many new plastic products—like buckets, storage bins, and film packaging—and increases required recycled content for existing categories over time. It also creates a fee and penalty system to fund enforcement, requires third-party verification, and mandates state agencies to prioritize buying compliant products starting in 2030.

  • Establishes new minimum postconsumer recycled content (PCRC) requirements for a broader set of plastic products—called PCRC 2.0 products—including rigid plastic containers (e.g., buckets, storage bins, nursery pots), roll carts, and film plastics (e.g., toilet paper packaging, shrink film), starting in 2029.
  • Increases existing PCRC requirements for beverage containers, household cleaning and personal care product containers, and plastic trash bags over time: beverage containers must reach 50% by 2031 (or 2036 for wine/dairy milk), household/personal care containers must reach 50% by 2031, and trash bags must reach 20% by 2027.
  • Requires producers to register with the Department of Ecology, submit annual reports on plastic use (virgin vs. recycled), and pay fees to cover regulatory costs; beginning in 2030, third-party certification of recycled content is required.
  • Creates a credit system: producers using 1 pound of postconsumer PET resin from North America receive 1.5 pounds of credit toward their PCRC 2.0 requirement, incentivizing use of domestically sourced recycled resin.
  • Sets penalties for noncompliance: up to $1,000 per day for registration/reporting violations, and a financial penalty calculated as 40 cents per pound of shortfall for recycled content requirements, with waivers for small amounts (< $100) and options for corrective action plans.
  • Requires the Department of Ecology to conduct a market study by 2033 and a full review of the program every 10 years starting in 2037, and to report annually to the legislature on program effectiveness and recommendations.

Who is affected

  • Producers of plastic packaging and productsProducers (including manufacturers, brand owners, importers, and distributors) of plastic packaging and products covered under the bill must meet minimum recycled content requirements, register with the state, submit annual reports, and pay fees to cover regulatory costs. They may face penalties for noncompliance.
  • Retailers and food service businessesRetailers and food service businesses that sell covered products must ensure products they sell comply with recycled content rules and may be subject to enforcement actions if noncompliant products are sold.
  • State agenciesState agencies must prioritize purchasing PCRC products from compliant producers starting in 2030, which could influence procurement decisions and supplier contracts.
  • Small producers and agricultural employersSmall producers with less than $5 million in annual revenue (adjusted for inflation after 2031) or those selling fewer than one ton per year of covered products may qualify as 'de minimis' and be exempt from some requirements, though still subject to registration and reporting.
  • ConsumersConsumers may see changes in packaging (e.g., recycled content labels), and potentially longer-term effects on product availability and pricing due to supply chain adjustments.
Effective: January 1, 2023Fiscal impact: Producers must pay annual fees to cover the Department of Ecology's costs for administration, rulemaking, and enforcement. Penalties for noncompliance (up to $1,000 per day for reporting violations and a formula-based penalty for recycled content shortfalls) are deposited into the Recycling Enhancement Account. The bill also allocates funding for a research study on plastic resin markets, with an expiration of the study requirement on July 1, 2033.Sunset: July 1, 2033
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 20, 2026 at 3:13 AM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Expanding recycled content requirements to include rigid plastics (e.g., buckets, storage bins) and film packaging significantly increases demand for domestic postconsumer recycled resin, supporting diversion from landfills and reducing virgin plastic production—thereby lowering greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuel extraction.

    EnvironmentPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1); Sec. 5(3)(a)(iii); Sec. 5(4)(c); Sec. 5(5)(c)
  • The 1.5:1 credit for North American PET resin creates a financial incentive to source recycled resin domestically, which could stimulate local recycling infrastructure, create jobs in collection/sorting/processing, and strengthen regional supply chains—especially for small-to-midsize recyclers and remanufacturers.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 3(2); Sec. 12(2); Sec. 13(1)
  • State agency procurement preferences for compliant PCRC products from registered producers create a guaranteed market for domestic recyclers and manufacturers—reducing market uncertainty and encouraging private investment in recycling infrastructure.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 14(2); Sec. 14(3)
  • Mandated market studies and decadal reviews will improve transparency and data availability on resin markets, helping policymakers and businesses make evidence-based decisions to expand recycling and reduce contamination—benefiting long-term sustainability and public trust in recycling systems.

    EnvironmentPeopleRef: Sec. 12(2); Sec. 13(1); Sec. 12(1)
  • By requiring third-party certification and annual reporting, the bill improves traceability and accountability in plastic supply chains, reducing the risk of noncompliant or hazardous recycled content entering consumer products—especially important for products used in food service or household settings.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 14(2); Sec. 14(3); Sec. 12(2); Sec. 13(1)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Producers (especially small and mid-sized manufacturers) face new compliance costs—including registration, annual reporting, third-party certification, and potential penalties—for a broader set of plastic products, which could increase operational complexity and reduce profit margins, particularly for firms without economies of scale.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 3(1); Sec. 5(3)(a)(iii); Sec. 5(4)(c); Sec. 5(5)(c)
  • The fee structure requires producers to pay for Department of Ecology administration and enforcement, but the bill does not cap or limit these fees, and the “workload analysis” method could lead to rising costs over time—especially if recycling infrastructure lags behind targets—potentially burdening small producers disproportionately.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 4(1); Sec. 5(3)(a)(iii); Sec. 5(4)(c); Sec. 5(5)(c)
  • Penalties for recycled content shortfalls are calculated at $0.40 per pound of shortfall, which could be financially destabilizing for producers facing supply chain constraints or market volatility in recycled resin availability—particularly for niche or specialty resins with limited domestic supply.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 7(2)(a)(i); Sec. 5(3)(a)(iii); Sec. 5(4)(c); Sec. 5(5)(c)
  • Local governments and retailers may face increased liability or enforcement risk if they sell noncompliant products, and must rely on producer compliance data—potentially increasing administrative burdens for local inspectors and consumer protection offices.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 11(1); Sec. 13(1); Sec. 14(2)
  • The bill’s de minimis exemption and exclusion of food/medical packaging may leave gaps in recycled content coverage, and the delayed implementation timeline (e.g., 2036 for dairy/wine) reduces near-term public health benefits—while the credit system for North American PET resin may not reduce domestic fossil fuel extraction if resin supply remains constrained or imported.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 14(2); Sec. 14(3); Sec. 12(2); Sec. 13(1)

Who Is Most Affected

Large producers and brand ownersMixed Impact

Large producers and brand owners (e.g., beverage, household goods, packaging firms) are best positioned to absorb compliance costs, benefit from economies of scale, and pass on modest price increases—while gaining competitive advantage if they already use high recycled content.

Small producers and agricultural employersMixed Impact

Small producers under the de minimis threshold ($5M revenue or <1 ton/year) are exempt from most requirements but still must register and report—potentially creating administrative burden relative to scale, though avoiding major capital or penalty risk.

Recycling and remanufacturing facilitiesPositive Impact

Recycling facilities and remanufacturers stand to gain from increased demand for domestic postconsumer resin, especially under the 1.5:1 PET credit, which improves the economics of sourcing North American resin—potentially expanding operations and hiring.

Retailers and food service businessesMixed Impact

Retailers and food service businesses face increased liability risk for noncompliant products and may see modest price increases or supply disruptions during transition—but are shielded from direct penalties unless acting as producers.

ConsumersPositive Impact

Consumers benefit from reduced plastic pollution and potential long-term environmental gains, but may face modest price increases for certain products (e.g., buckets, storage bins, film packaging) during early implementation—especially if recycled resin supply lags.

Sponsors

Senator Lovelett(Democrat)District 40Primary
Senator Hunt(Democrat)District 5Secondary
Senator Nobles(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Senator Saldaña(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Senator Shewmake(Democrat)District 42Secondary