Skip to main content

SB 6029

In Committee

Senate

Military code/victim rights

Changing the Washington code of military justice so that it includes certain protections for victims of an offense while serving within the organized militia of Washington.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 11, 2026
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: S State Gov/Trib
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill extends victims’ rights protections in Washington’s military justice system to members of the state’s National Guard when they are serving in a state capacity—ensuring parity with federal standards. It adds specific rights for victims during investigations, hearings, and sentencing, and sets rules for how defense attorneys may contact victims.

  • Grants victims of crimes under the Washington Code of Military Justice specific rights—including protection, timely notice of proceedings, the right to be heard, and the right to confer with prosecutors—when the accused is a member of the Washington National Guard serving in state status.
  • Defines 'victim' as someone who suffered direct physical, emotional, or financial harm from an offense under the military code.
  • Requires that accused service members’ attorneys request interviews with victims through official channels (e.g., victim’s counsel or prosecutor), and allows victims to require interviews occur with prosecutors or advocates present.
  • Clarifies that these rights apply regardless of conflicting state laws or the state constitution, ensuring consistency with federal military justice standards.
  • States that the bill does not create new lawsuits or liability for the state or its employees, and does not limit commander discretion in handling cases.

Who is affected

  • Washington National Guard members (state-status service members)Members of the Washington National Guard (both Army and Air) who are serving in a state capacity and become victims of crimes under the Washington Code of Military Justice gain new legal rights during military justice proceedings.
  • Crime victims in military justice proceedings under state authorityVictims of crimes committed by National Guard members while serving in state status gain specific rights including notification, presence at hearings, and the ability to be heard.
  • Military commanders and legal personnel in the Washington National GuardMilitary commanders and legal staff across Washington National Guard units must follow standardized victim rights procedures aligned with federal standards, affecting how cases are managed and prosecuted.
  • Victim advocates and military legal counselVictims’ advocates and legal counsel representing victims or the state gain new procedural clarity about how to interact with victims and accused service members during investigations and hearings.
Effective: July 28, 2026Fiscal impact: No significant fiscal impact is described; implementation is expected to use existing resources within the Military Department.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 9:34 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Grants state-status National Guard victims explicit, enforceable rights—including protection, notice, presence at hearings, and the right to be heard—mirroring federal victims’ rights, improving procedural fairness and dignity in military justice proceedings.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(a)-(i)
  • Requires defense attorneys to route victim interviews through official channels and permits victims to require prosecutors or advocates present during interviews, reducing coercive or retraumatizing direct contact with accused personnel.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 2(4)(a)-(b)
  • Ensures timely notice of release, opportunity to be heard at sentencing, and protection from unreasonable delays—enhancing victim safety, closure, and confidence in the justice process.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(b)(vi), (d)(ii), (g)
  • Provides victims the right to confer with prosecutors and be informed of plea or nonprosecution agreements, increasing transparency and giving victims a meaningful voice in case outcomes.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(e), (h)
  • Codifies the right to be treated with fairness, dignity, and respect—reinforcing a cultural shift toward victim-centered military justice in state service.

    Rights & LibertiesLean peopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(i)
Potential Concerns (1)
  • The bill explicitly bars victims or their families from bringing civil lawsuits or claims for damages if their rights under this law are violated, eliminating a key accountability mechanism for enforcement.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 2(3)(c)

Who Is Most Affected

Washington National Guard members (state-status service members)Positive Impact

Victims who are Washington National Guard members serving in state status gain formal legal rights during investigations and proceedings, improving access to justice and reducing retraumatization.

Crime victims in military justice proceedings under state authorityPositive Impact

Victims of crimes by state-status Guard members gain procedural rights (notice, presence, voice) previously unavailable under state military justice, aligning with federal standards.

Military commanders and legal personnel in the Washington National GuardMixed Impact

Commanders and legal staff must follow standardized victim rights procedures, increasing administrative burden but reducing legal ambiguity and improving consistency across units.

Victim advocates and military legal counselPositive Impact

Victim advocates and legal counsel gain clearer procedural authority to represent victims and control access to interviews, strengthening their role and reducing adversarial tactics.

Sponsors

Senator Wagoner(Republican)District 39Primary
Senator Nobles(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Senator Conway(Democrat)District 29Secondary
Senator Dhingra(Democrat)District 45Secondary