Skip to main content

SSB 5874

Signed

Senate

Unemployment info. reporting

Concerning employers' information reporting for purposes of unemployment compensation.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 22, 2026
Last Action: March 14, 2026
Status: C 43 L 26

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill strengthens requirements for employers to report worker information — including hours, wages, and job titles — to the Employment Security Department, and updates penalties for reporting errors or failures. It also clarifies how missing hours are calculated and allows tribes to voluntarily report job classifications.

  • Employers must keep accurate work records and allow state inspection, including records of compensation and unified business identifier for contractors.
  • Employers must report worker details (name, SSN, hours worked, job title/classification) to the Employment Security Department (ESD), with optional reporting of job titles for federally recognized tribes.
  • If an employer fails to report hours worked, ESD will compute hours using wages and the state minimum wage — this computed data is binding unless corrected with credible evidence, and benefits based on computed hours are not considered overpayments.
  • Penalties for late, incomplete, or incorrect reports increase with repetition: $25 warning for first offense, then $75, $150, or $250 for subsequent offenses within 5 years, depending on whether taxes are owed.
  • Penalties for failing to keep or preserve required records can reach $250 or 200% of quarterly tax, whichever is greater; intentional misreporting of payroll can result in up to 10× the underpaid contributions.
  • ESD must allow employers to correct reports before the due date without penalty, and may waive penalties for minor or inadvertent errors (e.g., software issues), especially if job title reporting is involved.

Who is affected

  • EmployersEmployers in Washington must now follow stricter rules for reporting worker information, including hours worked, wages, and job classifications. They may face penalties for errors or failures to report accurately, especially if errors are repeated or intentional.
  • WorkersWorkers may benefit from more accurate unemployment benefit calculations due to improved reporting of hours and wages, though computed hours (used when employers fail to report hours) could temporarily affect benefit amounts until corrected.
  • Federally recognized tribesFederally recognized tribes can choose whether to report job classifications for their workers and can opt out at any time; they are subject to the same reporting and penalty rules as other employers if they choose to report.
  • Contractors and subcontractorsContractors and subcontractors performing work under chapters 18.27 or 19.28 RCW (e.g., construction or domestic work) must have their business ID and compensation recorded by the hiring employer, or the hiring employer may face additional penalties.
Effective: July 28, 2026Fiscal impact: The bill may increase state revenue through higher penalties for reporting errors and failures, but could also reduce short-term revenue if penalties are waived for minor errors or if employers adjust reporting practices to avoid penalties. The department may incur costs to implement new reporting requirements and technical assistance programs.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 20, 2026 at 3:08 AM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Improves accuracy of unemployment benefit calculations by requiring detailed reporting of hours and wages, which helps ensure workers receive correct benefit amounts—especially beneficial for part-time, gig, and hourly workers who are most vulnerable to underreporting.

    FinancialPeopleRef: Sec. 1(2)(b), RCW 50.12.070
  • Includes explicit waiver provisions for minor or inadvertent errors (e.g., software failures), reducing the risk of punitive penalties for well-intentioned employers and promoting fair enforcement.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 2(2)(c)(i), RCW 50.12.220
  • Strengthens enforcement against misclassification of employees as independent contractors—particularly in construction and domestic work—by requiring hiring employers to retain UBID and compensation records, helping protect vulnerable workers from wage theft and ensuring fair competition.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 1(1)(b), RCW 50.12.070
  • Requires warning letters and technical assistance before penalties for first-time reporting errors, supporting employer education and reducing unintentional noncompliance—benefiting both employers and the public through more stable benefit administration.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(2)(a)(i), RCW 50.12.220
  • Allows federally recognized tribes to voluntarily report job classifications and opt out at any time—respecting tribal sovereignty while enabling improved data collection where tribes choose to participate.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 1(2)(a)(ii), RCW 50.12.070
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Increases compliance burden and financial risk for small employers through expanded recordkeeping requirements and escalating penalties for reporting errors, especially for those without dedicated HR/payroll staff or reliable software.

    Business & EmploymentLean industryRef: Sec. 1(3), RCW 50.12.070
  • Introduces a tiered penalty structure that disproportionately penalizes repeat offenders—even for minor or software-caused errors—potentially harming small businesses with limited administrative capacity and increasing administrative costs across the board.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 2(2)(a)(i), RCW 50.12.220
  • Mandates reporting of job titles and occupational classifications for all workers, which may require employers to invest in updated payroll systems or HR training—costs that fall most heavily on micro-businesses and sole proprietors.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 1(2)(a)(ii), RCW 50.12.070
  • Allows ESD to compute hours using wages divided by minimum wage—a formula that may misrepresent actual hours worked for salaried, exempt, or fluctuating-hour workers, potentially leading to incorrect benefit determinations and disputes that delay or reduce timely support for unemployed workers.

    Public SafetyIndustryRef: Sec. 1(2)(b), RCW 50.12.070
  • Requires employers to bear the financial cost of benefit overpayments stemming from their own reporting failures—even when errors stem from software glitches or minor administrative oversights—potentially harming small employers with thin margins.

    FinancialIndustryRef: Sec. 1(2)(b), RCW 50.12.070

Who Is Most Affected

Hourly and part-time workersPositive Impact

Hourly, part-time, and gig workers benefit most—more accurate wage/hour reporting reduces underpayment and ensures correct unemployment benefit calculations, especially for those with fluctuating hours or misclassified status.

Small employers and independent contractorsMixed Impact

Small employers (especially sole proprietors, contractors, and mom-and-pop shops) face increased administrative and financial burdens, including penalties for minor errors—even when caused by software—despite some leniency provisions.

Large employers and corporate entitiesMixed Impact

Large employers with robust HR/payroll departments may adapt more easily and benefit from clearer compliance expectations, while those with complex or misclassified workforces face higher liability risk.

Federally recognized tribesMixed Impact

Federally recognized tribes gain flexibility to opt in/out of job-title reporting, supporting data sovereignty while remaining subject to the same penalties if they choose to report—no net harm, but added administrative choice.

State government (ESD)Positive Impact

The state gains stronger enforcement tools to combat misclassification and improve benefit integrity, but must invest in technical infrastructure and outreach to ensure fair implementation.