Skip to main content

ESB 5581

In Committee

Senate

Safe system approach strat.

Implementing safe system approach strategies for active transportation infrastructure.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 29, 2025
Last Action: March 12, 2026
Status: S Rules 3
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill embeds the safe system approach into Washington’s transportation planning and design standards, with a focus on protecting people who walk, bike, or use mobility devices. It updates laws to protect trails and shared-use paths from highway construction, clarifies rules for roundabouts, and strengthens the complete streets policy to ensure new state highway projects include safe access for all users. It also creates new grant programs to fix past infrastructure gaps and prioritize equity.

  • Requires the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to apply a safe system approach—a proactive framework focused on preventing fatal and serious injuries—when designing and building transportation facilities, especially for pedestrians, bicyclists, and people using mobility devices.
  • Amends laws to protect and expand shared-use paths and trails, including requiring WSDOT to avoid severing existing or planned trails when building highways, and to provide replacement facilities when necessary.
  • Defines roundabouts and updates traffic laws to clarify how they function as single intersections, including revised definitions of crosswalks and intersection areas to support safe pedestrian and cyclist access.
  • Expands the complete streets policy to require WSDOT to plan, design, and build state highway projects ($500,000 or more) to safely accommodate *all* users—including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and people with disabilities—starting July 1, 2022.
  • Creates the Sandy Williams Connecting Communities Program to fund projects that repair historical disconnections in active transportation networks, especially in overburdened and vulnerable communities, and to prioritize equity, safety, and community engagement.
  • Establishes a Bicyclist and Pedestrian Grant Program to fund local projects improving safety and access for non-vehicle users, including sidewalks, bike lanes, crossings, and speed management measures.

Who is affected

  • Active transportation users (including people with disabilities)Residents who walk, bike, use wheelchairs or mobility devices, or use micromobility devices (e.g., scooters, skateboards) will benefit from improved infrastructure and safer, more connected routes for daily travel and access to services.
  • Local and tribal governmentsLocal governments and tribal nations may be asked to collaborate with WSDOT on trail or path projects, provide alternative facilities, or maintain improvements built on their systems under cooperative agreements.
  • Transportation agenciesState and local transportation agencies (e.g., WSDOT, city public works departments) must revise planning and design practices to incorporate safe system principles, complete streets, and roundabout-specific rules.
  • Commercial driversCommercial motor vehicle operators may need to adjust driving behavior when approaching or navigating roundabouts, especially regarding lane use.
Effective: July 1, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill authorizes spending from existing transportation funds (e.g., RCW 46.68.090) for planning, building, and maintaining active transportation infrastructure, roundabouts, and related safety improvements. It establishes new grant programs (Sandy Williams Connecting Communities Program, Bicyclist and Pedestrian Grant Program) whose funding would be subject to legislative appropriation. No new mandatory spending is created, but costs could increase over time as more projects are funded.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 9:06 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • The safe system approach and trail protection provisions directly reduce risk of fatal and serious injuries for pedestrians, cyclists, and people using mobility devices—especially children, seniors, and people with disabilities—by preventing highway severance of active transportation networks and standardizing roundabout safety rules.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 102; Sec. 103; Sec. 201–206
  • The new grant programs explicitly prioritize overburdened and vulnerable communities—including low-income households, people with disabilities, and communities of color—addressing decades of inequitable infrastructure investment and improving daily access to jobs, schools, and services for historically excluded populations.

    TransportationPeopleRef: Sec. 303 (Sandy Williams Connecting Communities Program); Sec. 304 (Bicyclist and Pedestrian Grant Program)
  • Mandating complete streets for all state highway projects $500,000+ ensures that new infrastructure does not further isolate or endanger non-drivers—especially low-income residents, seniors, and people with disabilities—by requiring ADA-accessible sidewalks, bike lanes, and crossings, thereby expanding mobility and independence.

    TransportationPeopleRef: Sec. 301 (Complete Streets); Sec. 204 (definition of 'Complete Streets')
  • By promoting walking, biking, and micromobility—and supporting greenways—the bill supports vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals, contributing to climate mitigation while improving air quality in communities near highways.

    EnvironmentPeopleRef: Sec. 101; Sec. 303(3)(c)(ii); Sec. 303(3)(d)
  • The bill creates opportunities for local contractors, engineers, and planners—especially through requirements for minority- and women-owned businesses and community-based organizations—to participate in active transportation projects, potentially generating local jobs and small business revenue.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 303(3)(c)(iii); Sec. 303(3)(iv); Sec. 304
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Mandating lower speed limits and roadway redesign in high-risk zones may increase driver frustration and lead to noncompliance or risky behaviors (e.g., speeding, ignoring signals), especially on roads where enforcement is weak—though the safe system approach is evidence-based, real-world compliance is uncertain without robust enforcement infrastructure.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 301(1)(c); Sec. 303(3)(c)(iv)
  • Local jurisdictions may face increased maintenance and liability burdens for facilities built or upgraded under cooperative agreements with WSDOT, especially if agreements lack clear cost-sharing or indemnification terms—though the bill allows substitution of local facilities, it does not guarantee funding for long-term upkeep.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 301(1)(e)(ii); Sec. 303(3)(c)(ii)
  • Mandating context-sensitive redesign—including speed management and physical separation—may delay or increase costs for large highway projects, potentially slowing infrastructure delivery or diverting funds from other critical state transportation needs, especially if legislative appropriations do not keep pace with demand.

    TransportationLean peopleRef: Sec. 301(1)(d); Sec. 301(1)(c)
  • While not directly housing-related, improved active transportation access may increase demand—and thus prices—for housing near newly connected amenities in historically disinvested neighborhoods, potentially accelerating displacement of low-income residents if not paired with robust affordability safeguards.

    HousingLean peopleRef: Sec. 301(1)(e)(iii); Sec. 303(3)(c)(i)
  • The bill emphasizes crash data in project selection, but crash data for vulnerable road users is often underreported or inconsistently collected—potentially leading to misallocation of funds away from high-risk areas lacking robust data, unless WSDOT invests in improved data collection.

    Public SafetyRef: Sec. 301(1)(e)(iv); Sec. 303(3)(f)

Who Is Most Affected

Active transportation users (especially low-income, disabled, and older adults)Positive Impact

People who walk, bike, use wheelchairs, or micromobility devices gain significantly: safer, more connected infrastructure reduces injury risk and expands access to jobs, healthcare, and community. Equity-focused grant criteria ensure priority for historically excluded users.

Local and tribal governmentsMixed Impact

Local governments benefit from new grant funding and flexibility to substitute local facilities, but may face added maintenance and liability responsibilities—especially if cooperative agreements lack clear cost-sharing terms. Equity-focused projects may also require new capacity for community engagement.

Transportation agencies (WSDOT, city public works)Mixed Impact

WSDOT and local transportation agencies must adopt new planning standards and data practices, increasing administrative burden—but gain flexibility to meet equity and safety goals. The bill does not mandate new staffing, so capacity constraints may slow implementation.

Commercial driversMixed Impact

Commercial drivers may face behavioral adjustments (e.g., lane discipline near roundabouts), but the bill explicitly allows deviation for safe roundabout navigation—reducing crash risk for all users. No evidence suggests significant operational costs.

Overburdened and vulnerable communitiesPositive Impact

Low-income and minority communities—especially those near highways bisecting neighborhoods—gain priority access to funding for reconnecting streets, improving health outcomes and economic access. However, without affordability safeguards, improved access may contribute to gentrification.

Sponsors

Senator Shewmake(Democrat)District 42Primary
Senator Liias(Democrat)District 21Secondary
Senator Nobles(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Senator Valdez(Democrat)District 46Secondary