Skip to main content
← Back to bills

SB 5575

In Committee

Senate

Parenting plan limitations

Concerning limitations in parenting plans.

  1. Introduced (completed)
  2. 2
    Committee (current stage)
  3. 3
    Floor Vote (not started)
  4. 4
    Opposite Chamber (not started)
  5. 5
    Governor (not started)
  6. 6
    Signed (not started)

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 28, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: S Law & Justice
Companion Bill: #1620

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill strengthens protections for children by requiring courts to impose specific limitations on a parent’s residential time, decision-making authority, and dispute resolution options when the parent has engaged in serious harmful conduct—including sexual abuse, physical/emotional abuse, domestic violence, or willful abandonment. It also protects parents who act in good faith to protect their children and clarifies when restrictions can be lifted only under strict conditions.

  • Requires courts to impose limitations on residential time, decision-making authority, and dispute resolution when a parent has engaged in serious harmful conduct—including sexual abuse of a child, physical or emotional abuse, domestic violence, or willful abandonment.
  • Establishes a rebuttable presumption that a parent convicted of or found to have sexually abused a child poses a danger, and prohibits unsupervised contact unless specific, stringent conditions are met—including treatment completion, therapist recommendations, and two years of successful supervised contact.
  • Expands restrictions to parents who knowingly reside with someone convicted or adjudicated of a sex offense against a child, requiring supervised contact or prohibiting contact unless rebuttal conditions are satisfied.
  • Clarifies that 'protective actions' (e.g., reporting abuse to authorities, seeking restraining orders) do not constitute 'abusive use of conflict' and may not be used as grounds to limit a parent’s rights.
  • Requires courts to consider specific factors—including risk of harm, past behavior, and compliance with treatment—when deciding whether to impose or lift limitations, and mandates detailed written findings for any deviation from mandatory restrictions.

Who is affected

  • Parents with sex offense convictions or findings — Parents who have been convicted of or found to have committed sex offenses against children, or who live with someone who has such a conviction or finding, may face restrictions or prohibitions on residential time, decision-making authority, and dispute resolution options. They may be required to undergo treatment, complete psychosexual evaluations, or have supervised contact only.
  • Children at risk of sexual abuse — Children who have been victims of sexual abuse by a parent or who may be exposed to someone who has committed sexual abuse may be protected through restrictions on contact, mandatory supervision, or complete prohibition of contact unless specific conditions are met.
  • Protective parents — Parents who report abuse or take protective actions (e.g., seeking restraining orders, reporting to authorities) are protected from being labeled as engaging in 'abusive use of conflict' and may have their parenting time or decision-making authority preserved or expanded.
  • Court-appointed professionals (e.g., guardians ad litem) — Guardians ad litem and other professionals involved in family court cases must have additional training related to identifying and responding to limiting factors, especially those involving abuse or sex offenses, and must follow new appointment and supervision protocols.
Effective: July 28, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill may increase costs for courts and supervision programs due to more rigorous requirements for supervised visitation, professional evaluations (e.g., psychosexual evaluations), and additional training for guardians ad litem. However, no specific dollar amount is provided in the bill text.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026, 9:05 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (4)
  • The bill establishes a rebuttable presumption that a parent convicted of a sex offense poses a present danger to a child, mandating restrictions on contact unless specific safety conditions are met, which directly protects children from sexual abuse.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2, subsection (2)(a) and Sec. 1, subsection (4)(a)(iv)
  • The bill explicitly defines 'protective actions' (such as reporting abuse or seeking restraining orders) as not constituting 'abusive use of conflict,' preventing parents who report abuse from being penalized or having their rights limited in custody disputes.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 1, subsection (3)(e) and Sec. 1, subsection (4)(c)(vi)
  • The bill expands protections to children who may be exposed to individuals convicted of sex offenses by requiring courts to limit residential time or mandate supervision when a parent knowingly resides with such a person, reducing the risk of secondary victimization.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2, subsection (3)(a) and Sec. 1, subsection (4)(b)(iii)
  • The bill mandates additional training for guardians ad litem in cases involving limiting factors and establishes a rotational registry system to ensure consistent, qualified appointment of professionals, improving the quality of child advocacy in family court.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 8, subsection (1) and Sec. 8, subsection (2)(a)
Potential Concerns (3)
  • The bill imposes a mandatory two-year supervised contact period and requires psychosexual evaluations for parents convicted of sex offenses to regain unsupervised contact, which may be financially burdensome and restricts parental rights even after successful treatment.

    Rights & LibertiesLean industryRef: Sec. 1, subsection (4)(b)(i)(B) and Sec. 2, subsection (4)(c)(iv)
  • Parents who reside with individuals convicted of sex offenses face a rebuttable presumption of risk, potentially limiting their residential time or requiring supervision, which may disproportionately affect low-income families who rely on extended family or roommates for housing support.

    Rights & LibertiesLean industryRef: Sec. 1, subsection (4)(b)(i)(A) and Sec. 2, subsection (3)(a)
  • The requirement for professional supervision and additional training for guardians ad litem will increase operational costs for court systems and local governments, potentially diverting funds from other public services.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 8, subsection (2)(a) and Sec. 1, subsection (4)(d)(i)(A)

Who Is Most Affected

  • Parents with sex offense convictionsNegative Impact

    These individuals face mandatory restrictions on residential time, decision-making authority, and dispute resolution options, requiring them to complete treatment and undergo supervised contact to regain rights.

  • Children at risk of sexual abusePositive Impact

    Children who have been victims of sexual abuse or who may be exposed to individuals convicted of sex offenses are protected through mandatory restrictions on contact, supervision, or prohibition of contact unless specific safety conditions are met.

  • Protective parentsPositive Impact

    Parents who report abuse or take protective actions are protected from being labeled as engaging in 'abusive use of conflict,' ensuring their parenting time and decision-making authority are not unfairly limited.

  • Court-appointed professionalsMixed Impact

    Guardians ad litem and other professionals involved in family court cases must complete additional training and follow new appointment protocols, increasing their workload and requiring specialized expertise in identifying and responding to limiting factors.

  • Court systems and local governmentsNegative Impact

    Courts and local governments will face increased costs due to more rigorous requirements for supervised visitation, professional evaluations, and additional training for guardians ad litem, potentially straining existing resources.

Sponsors

  • Senator Dhingra(Democrat)District 45Primary
  • Senator Cortes(Democrat)District 18Secondary
  • Senator Nobles(Democrat)District 28Secondary