Skip to main content

SB 5386

In Committee

Senate

Schools/sexual assault

Supporting survivors of sexual assault in public elementary and secondary schools.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 20, 2025
Last Action: February 26, 2026
Status: S Rules X
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill improves how Washington’s public schools respond to student survivors of sexual assault by requiring updated staff training, developing clear guidance for students and families, and involving youth advisors in reviewing and recommending improvements to policies and training. It also clarifies reporting procedures for school employees who learn about abuse by other staff members.

  • The Legislative Youth Advisory Council must hold up to three meetings with state agencies and community experts to review current policies and training on mandatory reporting of child abuse and sexual assault, and to issue recommendations by December 1, 2025.
  • The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) must develop and post online, by November 1, 2026, updated staff training materials on trauma-informed and survivor-centered responses to sexual abuse, misconduct, and assault—including bystander intervention—and consider youth council recommendations.
  • School employees must receive training on mandatory reporting and survivor-centered responses during onboarding and every three years, with the option to use OSPI’s new training materials.
  • OSPI, in partnership with the Washington State School Directors’ Association and community experts, must create and update a student and family guide explaining school policies on sexual harassment and mandatory reporting, which must be culturally informed and translated into common non-English languages.
  • The bill clarifies that school administrators must contact all parties involved when determining whether to report suspected abuse or assault, and reinforces that this law does not override existing mandatory reporting laws under RCW 26.44.030.

Who is affected

  • School staffSchool employees (both certificated and classified) must complete updated training on recognizing and responding to sexual abuse, misconduct, and assault, including bystander intervention, and must follow new reporting procedures when they become aware of such incidents involving students.
  • Students and familiesStudents and their families gain access to clearer, culturally responsive, and multilingual guidance about how to report sexual abuse or misconduct and what to expect from school systems.
  • State agencies and community organizationsState agencies and local community experts will collaborate with student advisors to review and improve policies and training related to mandatory reporting and survivor support.
  • Youth advisorsThe Legislative Youth Advisory Council will lead a time-limited review and recommendation process focused on improving how schools respond to student survivors of sexual assault.
Effective: August 1, 2027Fiscal impact: The bill requires development of training materials and a student and family guide by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, which may involve additional staff time and resources; however, no specific funding or cost estimate is provided in the bill text.Sunset: August 1, 2027
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:54 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (4)
  • Culturally informed, multilingual student and family guides improve transparency and accessibility for non-English speakers and marginalized communities, helping families understand rights and reporting pathways—especially critical for vulnerable students who may otherwise be excluded or misinformed.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 4(1)-(2)(c)
  • Mandatory trauma-informed and survivor-centered training—including bystander intervention—for all school staff improves early identification and appropriate response to abuse, reducing retraumatization and increasing likelihood of timely reporting to law enforcement.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1), Sec. 3(2)(b)
  • Youth-led review and recommendations (via the Legislative Youth Advisory Council) ensure policies reflect lived experience and student needs, increasing policy legitimacy and relevance—especially for survivors who have historically been excluded from decision-making.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 1(3), Sec. 2(2)
  • Clarifying that administrators must contact all parties before determining whether to report suspected abuse helps prevent rushed or biased conclusions, reducing risk of false accusations while preserving due process for all involved.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1)
Potential Concerns (1)
  • School staff must complete updated training every three years, which may increase time and administrative burden on districts, especially where staffing is already stretched; however, the training may be incorporated into existing programs and use state-provided materials, reducing incremental cost.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 2, Sec. 3(2)(c)

Who Is Most Affected

Students (especially survivors of sexual assault or misconduct)Positive Impact

Students—especially survivors of sexual assault or misconduct—gain clearer, safer, and more accessible pathways to report abuse and receive support, reducing isolation and increasing trust in school systems.

Families and caregiversPositive Impact

Families—particularly those from low-income, immigrant, or linguistically diverse backgrounds—benefit from multilingual, culturally responsive guidance, enabling more informed participation in complaint processes.

School staff (certificated and classified)Mixed Impact

School staff gain improved tools and clarity to respond appropriately to abuse disclosures, reducing legal liability and emotional burden—but face increased training obligations with no guaranteed additional staffing or compensation.

School districtsMixed Impact

School districts benefit from standardized, state-provided training and guidance, reducing need to develop materials from scratch—but may face implementation costs if OSPI resources are insufficient.

State agencies and community-based service providersMixed Impact

State agencies (e.g., OSPI, DCYF, DHSS) and community organizations gain new collaborative roles in policy review and training development, strengthening interagency coordination—but may require additional staffing or reallocation of existing resources.

Sponsors

Senator Orwall(Democrat)District 33Primary
Senator Dhingra(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Senator Frame(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Senator Hasegawa(Democrat)District 11Secondary
Senator Krishnadasan(Democrat)District 26Secondary
Senator Nobles(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Senator Saldaña(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Senator Trudeau(Democrat)District 27Secondary
Senator Valdez(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Senator Wilson(Democrat)District 30Secondary