Skip to main content

SSB 5365

Signed

Senate

Library funding alternate

Concerning alternate funding for libraries.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 19, 2025
Last Action: May 13, 2025
Status: C 275 L 25

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill clarifies that public libraries can be included as part of recreational facilities operated by park and recreation districts, as long as libraries make up less than 45% of the total usable space in a community center. It updates the legal definition of recreational facilities to support integrated community services.

  • Amends existing law to clarify that 'recreational facilities' can include public libraries, but only if they make up less than 45 percent of the total usable space in a community center.
  • Authorizes park and recreation districts to include public libraries as part of their recreational programming and facilities, as long as the library space remains a minority portion of the total facility.
  • Expands the definition of 'recreational facilities' to explicitly include community centers that may house libraries, supporting integrated community service delivery.

Who is affected

  • Residents of areas with park and recreation districtsMay allow park and recreation districts to include public libraries as part of their recreational facilities, potentially expanding library access and services in areas served by such districts.
  • Park and recreation districtsMay gain authority to operate or partner on library services as part of broader recreational programming, especially in areas where library infrastructure is limited or underfunded.
  • Public libraries and library systemsCould see changes in how library services are funded or delivered if libraries are incorporated into park and recreation district operations.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:52 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (3)
  • May improve access to library services in underserved areas where standalone libraries are economically unfeasible—especially in rapidly growing suburbs or rural communities—by enabling co-location in existing park and recreation centers, reducing infrastructure costs and increasing foot traffic for library users.

    EducationPeopleRef: Amends RCW 36.69.010 to include public libraries within 'recreational facilities' if they constitute less than 45% of usable space in a community center
  • Could support integrated community hubs in new mixed-use developments (e.g., transit-oriented housing), making libraries more accessible to low-income renters and seniors who rely on public transit and may not drive to distant branches—particularly valuable in high-cost urban and suburban areas.

    HousingPeopleRef: Authorizes park and recreation districts to include public libraries as part of their recreational programming and facilities
  • Promotes safer, more vibrant community spaces by encouraging shared use of facilities—libraries in parks can increase daytime foot traffic, improve natural surveillance, and reduce blight in underutilized areas, especially in neighborhoods with limited recreational infrastructure.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Expands definition of 'recreational facilities' to explicitly include community centers that may house libraries
Potential Concerns (3)
  • The bill may blur the distinction between recreational and educational/civic services, potentially diluting the focus and resources dedicated to library-specific public goods like literacy, digital access, and civic education—services that disproportionately benefit low-income, elderly, and non-English-speaking residents.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Amends RCW 36.69.010 to include public libraries within 'recreational facilities' if they constitute less than 45% of usable space in a community center
  • Municipal governance may become more complex: park and recreation districts are not currently structured to manage library functions (e.g., cataloging, collection development, professional librarianship), potentially leading to service degradation or increased administrative overhead if library operations are outsourced or misaligned with core district expertise.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Authorizes park and recreation districts to include public libraries as part of their recreational programming, as long as library space remains under 45% of total facility
  • While intended to support integration, the bill does not guarantee library staffing, funding, or professional standards will be maintained—risking that libraries embedded in park districts could become de facto community lounges with reduced access to trained librarians, reference services, or curated collections.

    EducationLean peopleRef: Expands definition of 'recreational facilities' to explicitly include community centers that may house libraries

Who Is Most Affected

Low-income and transit-dependent residentsPositive Impact

Residents in low-income or transit-dependent neighborhoods may gain easier access to library services through co-located facilities, especially where standalone branches are scarce or underfunded.

Public library patrons (especially seniors, youth, and non-English speakers)Mixed Impact

May benefit from expanded services and reduced duplication of infrastructure—but risk losing dedicated library staff, collections, or programming if park districts lack expertise or prioritization.

Public libraries and library systemsMixed Impact

Could reduce capital costs for new library construction by piggybacking on park district facilities—but may face governance conflicts, reduced autonomy, or budget competition with recreational programming.

Park and recreation districtsMixed Impact

May gain new funding flexibility and expanded service mandates—but will need to hire or train staff for library functions, potentially straining existing budgets and operational models.

Local government planners and officialsMixed Impact

Municipal planners and developers may find it easier to integrate libraries into new community centers or mixed-use projects, accelerating service delivery—but may face confusion over jurisdictional responsibilities.