Skip to main content

SB 5269

In Committee

Senate

Sentence modification

Providing judicial discretion to modify sentences in the interest of justice.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 13, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: S Law & Justice
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill allows incarcerated individuals to petition courts to modify their sentences if the original sentence no longer serves the interests of justice, based on factors like age at offense, time served, rehabilitation, and medical condition. It establishes a phased eligibility schedule beginning in 2026 and provides support for victims throughout the process.

  • Authorizes incarcerated individuals to petition courts to modify their sentences if the original sentence no longer serves the interests of justice and they meet specific eligibility criteria based on age at offense, time served, and medical condition.
  • Sets a tiered schedule for eligibility: starting July 1, 2026, people sentenced for offenses committed at age 17 or younger may petition after serving 7 years; eligibility expands over time to include more people, including those sentenced for offenses committed at age 18 or older after serving 10–20 years, depending on the year.
  • Allows petitioners who are terminally ill or have a permanent or degenerative medical condition that renders them not a threat to public safety to petition at any time.
  • Requires courts to hold a hearing within 120 days of accepting a petition and permits sentence reductions—subject to limits such as not exceeding the original sentence, preserving mandatory minimums, and ensuring release no sooner than 6 months after the hearing.
  • Creates a flexible fund administered by the Office of Crime Victims Advocacy to support victims with relocation, travel, and therapy costs, and mandates victim notification and advocacy services during proceedings.

Who is affected

  • Incarcerated individuals serving long-term sentencesIncarcerated individuals serving long-term sentences (over 10 years) who meet specific age-at-offense and time-served criteria may petition courts to have their sentences reviewed and potentially reduced.
  • Victims and survivors of crimeVictims and survivors of crimes committed by petitioners may receive support services, including relocation assistance, travel reimbursement, therapy, and safety planning, and have the right to speak at sentencing hearings.
  • Indigent incarcerated individuals seeking sentence modificationPublic defense offices will provide court-appointed attorneys to eligible incarcerated petitioners who cannot afford representation for sentence modification proceedings.
  • Prosecuting attorneysProsecuting attorneys must notify victims of hearings and may be required to coordinate victim advocacy services under the bill.
  • Office of Crime Victims AdvocacyThe Office of Crime Victims Advocacy will administer a flexible fund for victims and contract to provide victim advocacy services related to sentence modification proceedings.
Effective: July 1, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill is expected to produce cost savings to the state by reducing long-term incarceration expenses, though funding is also allocated for victim services and legal representation.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:47 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Restores meaningful judicial discretion to modify sentences that no longer serve justice, correcting overly harsh outcomes for individuals who have aged, been rehabilitated, or suffered severe health decline — aligning with constitutional principles of proportionality and individualized sentencing.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1)(a)(i), (b)-(g); Sec. 3(2)(a)-(b)
  • Provides court-appointed counsel for indigent petitioners, ensuring equal access to justice and reducing the risk of wrongful continued incarceration due to lack of legal representation — a cost-effective safeguard against systemic inequity.

    FinancialPeopleRef: Sec. 3(13); Sec. 4
  • Encourages rehabilitative programming by making rehabilitation a central eligibility factor and allowing courts to consider changed circumstances and diminished culpability over time — which research shows reduces recidivism and improves long-term public safety.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1)(a)(ii), (b)-(g); Sec. 3(5)(b)(ii), (iv)
  • Requires the Department of Corrections to notify incarcerated individuals about eligibility and timelines, promoting awareness and informed decision-making — supporting informed participation in the justice process.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1)(a)(i), (b)-(g); Sec. 3(15)
  • Requires individualized reentry plans and allows courts to consider extraordinary adverse impact on victims, balancing reintegration needs with community safety — supporting stable housing and community placement outcomes.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1)(a)(i), (b)-(g); Sec. 3(16); Sec. 3(5)(b)(i)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Reduces long-term incarceration of individuals who are no longer a threat to public safety due to age, medical condition, or rehabilitation, thereby lowering the risk of prison-based violence and reducing overcrowding — which is associated with improved institutional safety for staff and incarcerated people alike.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1)(a)(ii), (d), (e), (f), (g)
  • Mandates a 6-month buffer before release and requires individualized reentry planning, which supports successful community reintegration and reduces recidivism risk — consistent with evidence that structured transition support improves public safety outcomes.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(5)(a)(iii), (17); Sec. 3(16)
  • Provides robust victim support services (relocation, therapy, advocacy) and ensures victim participation in hearings, which helps mitigate trauma and reduces the risk of retaliatory violence — supporting long-term community safety.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(9)(a)-(c), (10); Sec. 4
  • Creates a tiered, time-based eligibility schedule that gradually expands access to sentence modification, allowing the system to calibrate oversight and supervision capacity — reducing the risk of premature release while still enabling justice reinvestment.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1)(a)(i) through (g); Sec. 3(2)(a)-(b)
  • Excludes individuals sentenced under RCW 9.94A.570 (life without parole for aggravated murder) and preserves mandatory minimums, ensuring that the most serious offenders remain incarcerated — protecting public safety while allowing flexibility for others.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(1)(a)(ii), (17); Sec. 3(5)(a)(ii)

Sponsors

Senator Frame(Democrat)District 36Primary
Senator Lovick(Democrat)District 44Secondary
Senator Valdez(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Senator Wellman(Democrat)District 41Secondary
Senator Hasegawa(Democrat)District 11Secondary
Senator Trudeau(Democrat)District 27Secondary
Senator Saldaña(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Senator Nobles(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Senator Wilson(Democrat)District 30Secondary