Skip to main content
Evergreen Ledger

ESSB 5192

Signed

Senate

School district materials

Concerning school district materials, supplies, and operating costs.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 26, 2025
Last Action: May 17, 2025
Status: C 334 L 25
View Bill Text (HTML) (opens in new tab)View Bill Text (PDF) (opens in new tab)

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill updates Washington’s basic education funding formula to increase and clarify state funding for school materials, supplies, and operating costs, and to improve transparency about how funds are allocated and spent. It raises per-student allocations for core operational needs and adds new reporting and transparency requirements for school districts.

  • Revises the state funding formula for basic education to include a new baseline allocation of $1,723.42 per student (K–12) and $229.37 per student (grades 9–12) for materials, supplies, and operating costs—adjusted annually for inflation starting in fiscal year 2026.
  • Requires the superintendent of public instruction to publish per-pupil funding data for major programs (general apportionment, special education, etc.) on the office’s website, and mandates school districts to link to that report on their own websites.
  • Updates staffing formulas for prototypical schools (e.g., high school = 600 FTE students; elementary = 400 FTE), including class size targets, support staff allocations (e.g., counselors, nurses, paraeducators), and career and technical education.
  • Adds new reporting requirements: school districts must annually report spending on materials, supplies, and operating costs broken down by category (e.g., technology, utilities, curriculum) to the office of the superintendent of public instruction.
  • Increases funding for targeted programs, including learning assistance (for students not meeting academic standards), transitional bilingual instruction, and highly capable programs—with formulas tied to student need (e.g., free/reduced-price meal eligibility).

Who is affected

  • Public school districts — School districts receive updated funding formulas and requirements for how state basic education funds must be used, including new reporting and transparency obligations.
  • K–12 students — Students in grades K–12 may benefit from increased funding for classroom materials, supplies, and support staff, especially in high-poverty schools and for career and technical education.
  • School staff (teachers, paraeducators, administrators, support staff) — Teachers and support staff (e.g., paraeducators, counselors, nurses) may see changes in staffing allocations, salary support, and reporting requirements tied to funding.
  • Families and caregivers — Families and caregivers benefit from increased transparency on per-pupil funding and clearer expectations for how schools use state funds.
Effective: July 1, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill increases state funding for materials, supplies, and operating costs by $156.67 per full-time equivalent student (K–12) and $20.85 per FTE student in grades 9–12, adjusted annually for inflation. These increases are intended to offset rising costs in areas like technology, utilities, curriculum, and facilities maintenance. Additional funding is also allocated for learning assistance, bilingual education, and career and technical education, with total fiscal impact determined annually in the omnibus operating appropriations act.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:42 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)

  • The bill establishes a new baseline allocation of $1,723.42 per K–12 student and $229.37 per 9–12 student for materials, supplies, and operating costs—adjusted annually for inflation starting in FY2026—addressing long-standing underfunding of operational needs like technology, utilities, curriculum, and facilities maintenance, which disproportionately burden districts serving low-income students.

    EducationPeopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(8)(a)–(b)

  • The bill adds a high-poverty-based learning assistance allocation for schools where ≥50% of students qualify for free/reduced-price meals, ensuring that schools with the greatest need receive additional targeted support—this directly benefits students in high-poverty schools who are more likely to face academic gaps and lack access to supplemental instruction.

    EducationPeopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(10)(a)(ii)

  • The bill updates staffing formulas to include minimum allocations for paraeducators, counselors, nurses, and social workers across prototypical schools, improving capacity to support student well-being and academic success—especially in high-need schools where such staff are often under-resourced or absent.

    EducationPeopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(5)(a)

  • The bill mandates transparency by requiring the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to publish per-pupil funding data for major programs and requiring districts to link to that report on their websites—empowering families, especially in low-income and communities of color, to hold districts accountable for equitable resource allocation.

    EducationPeopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(2)(b)

  • The bill increases funding for highly capable programs at 5% of district FTE enrollment, helping ensure that high-achieving students—including those in underserved communities—receive appropriate academic challenge and support, mitigating equity gaps in gifted education.

    EducationPeopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(10)(c)
Potential Concerns (4)

  • The bill increases state funding for materials, supplies, and operating costs by $156.67 per FTE student (K–12) and $20.85 per FTE student (9–12), but these increases are tied to inflation adjustments starting in FY2026 and do not include new dedicated revenue sources—meaning the increases rely on future legislative appropriation and may be vulnerable to budget shortfalls, especially during economic downturns. This creates uncertainty for districts planning multi-year budgets and may lead to underfunding if inflation outpaces the deflator or if general fund revenues decline.

    FinancialPeopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(8)(a)–(d)

  • The bill allows the superintendent to fund physical, social, and emotional support staff (e.g., nurses, counselors, psychologists) only to the extent of a district’s demonstrated actual staffing ratios—meaning districts already under-resourced in these roles may not receive additional funding unless they first hire staff, creating a catch-22 for high-need schools that lack capacity to meet baseline ratios.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(5)(b)(i)

  • The requirement that districts use increased allocations to support paraeducators, office support, and noninstructional aides in 2024–25 may pressure districts to hire quickly without competitive hiring processes or professional development, potentially lowering quality of support staff and increasing turnover—especially in districts already struggling with staffing shortages.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(5)(c)

  • The annual reporting requirement for materials, supplies, and operating costs by district may impose administrative burdens on smaller districts with limited staff and technology capacity, diverting time and resources from instructional priorities—particularly burdensome for districts without dedicated finance or data teams.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: RCW 28A.150.260(8)(d)

Who Is Most Affected

Public school districtsMixed Impact

Public school districts benefit significantly from increased operational funding and updated staffing formulas, but face new reporting and transparency requirements that may strain smaller districts with limited administrative capacity. High-poverty districts gain targeted learning assistance, but may struggle to meet new staffing thresholds without additional flexibility.

K–12 studentsPositive Impact

Students in high-poverty schools and those needing supplemental instruction (e.g., learning assistance, bilingual, highly capable) benefit most from targeted funding increases and expanded support staff. However, students in districts with historically underfunded support services may not see improvements unless districts prioritize hiring over retention of existing staff.

School staff (teachers, paraeducators, administrators, support staff)Positive Impact

Paraeducators, counselors, nurses, and social workers benefit from updated staffing formulas and requirements to use increased funding for support staff—potentially improving job security and reducing turnover. However, the requirement to hire quickly in 2024–25 may lead to rushed hiring and lower wages if districts compete for limited talent without collective bargaining.

Families and caregiversPositive Impact

Families and caregivers benefit from increased transparency on per-pupil funding and clearer expectations for how schools use state funds—especially helpful for low-income families and those with limited access to district financial data. However, families in districts with limited capacity to implement new reporting may not see meaningful improvements in accountability.

Local governmentsMixed Impact

Local governments (especially smaller school districts) face new administrative burdens from reporting and transparency requirements, but benefit from increased state funding that reduces reliance on local property taxes—potentially easing pressure on local levies in high-need communities.