Skip to main content

HR 4677

In Committee

House

Construction worker health

Recognizing the importance of behavioral health for construction workers.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 17, 2026
Last Action: February 18, 2026
Status: H Adopted

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This resolution recognizes the severe behavioral health crisis among Washington’s construction workers—including high suicide rates, substance use, and mental health challenges—and urges collaboration across sectors to improve access to care and support. It does not create new laws or funding but serves as a formal statement of concern and commitment to action.

  • Expresses recognition that construction workers have significantly higher rates of suicide compared to the general population and are the occupational group with the highest suicide rate in the U.S.
  • Acknowledges that substance use disorders, especially opioid misuse, disproportionately affect construction workers due to work-related injuries, chronic pain, and hazardous conditions.
  • Highlights how physically demanding work, long hours, cyclical employment, high injury rates, and economic instability contribute to elevated rates of stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout.
  • Emphasizes the need for timely, culturally competent behavioral health care, including prevention, peer support, substance use treatment, and recovery resources.
  • Calls for reducing stigma around mental health and substance use to encourage workers to seek help without fear of judgment or retaliation.

Who is affected

  • Construction workersConstruction workers face higher rates of suicide, substance use disorders, and mental health challenges due to job stress, injury, and economic instability; the resolution aims to support their access to behavioral health care and reduce stigma.
  • Construction employers and industry organizationsEmployers, unions, and trade associations in the construction industry may be encouraged to collaborate on behavioral health initiatives and support programs for workers.
  • State government agencies and legislatorsState agencies and policymakers may use this resolution as a framework to develop or expand behavioral health programs and policies targeting high-risk occupational groups.
  • Families and communities of construction workersFamilies and communities of construction workers benefit from improved worker well-being, reduced suicide risk, and stronger economic stability.
Effective: February 18, 2026
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:23 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • By formally acknowledging the crisis-level suicide rates among construction workers—a group with the highest occupational suicide rate in the U.S.—the resolution elevates visibility of a preventable public health emergency, potentially accelerating targeted interventions that save lives.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
  • The resolution explicitly calls for culturally competent, timely behavioral health services—including peer support and substance use treatment—which, if followed by legislation or agency action, could significantly improve access for a historically underserved and high-risk workforce.

    HealthcarePeopleRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
  • By encouraging cross-sector collaboration (e.g., unions, employers, state agencies), the resolution may spur industry-led initiatives (e.g., on-site counseling, peer networks) that improve retention and productivity—especially beneficial for small shops that lack HR infrastructure but value workforce stability.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
  • The resolution’s emphasis on reducing stigma and normalizing mental health support in the trades could influence trade school curricula and apprenticeship programs, fostering earlier behavioral health literacy among future workers.

    EducationPeopleRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
  • By linking economic instability (e.g., cyclical work, project delays) to behavioral health decline, the resolution indirectly supports policies that stabilize income and housing security—key social determinants of mental health—for construction workers and their families.

    HousingPeopleRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The resolution raises awareness of construction workers’ elevated suicide and substance use rates, which could catalyze future policy interventions—but as a non-binding resolution with no funding or enforcement mechanisms, it carries no direct regulatory or operational impact on public safety outcomes.

    Public SafetyRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
  • While the resolution highlights gaps in behavioral health access for a high-risk occupational group, it does not create or expand services, funding, or provider capacity—so it has no immediate effect on actual healthcare delivery or outcomes.

    HealthcareRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
  • The resolution does not impose new regulatory burdens or costs on employers, but it also does not provide tax incentives, grants, or staffing support to help small contractors or solo proprietors implement behavioral health programs—limiting its practical utility for most construction businesses.

    Business & EmploymentRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
  • As a resolution, it imposes no mandates on counties or municipalities, but it also does not allocate state resources to support local implementation of worker support programs—leaving any downstream action entirely voluntary and under-resourced.

    Local GovernmentRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)
  • The resolution affirms the dignity and well-being of workers, but since it lacks legal teeth, it does not create enforceable rights—e.g., no right to access specific services or protection from retaliation for seeking care—limiting its utility for workers seeking accountability.

    Rights & LibertiesRef: WHEREAS clauses (entire resolution)

Who Is Most Affected

Construction workersPositive Impact

Construction workers—especially hourly, non-union, and those in small firms—bear the highest risk of suicide and substance use; this resolution may reduce stigma and increase access to care, but without funding or mandates, real-world impact depends on voluntary employer action.

Construction employers and industry organizationsMixed Impact

Unions and large contractors may use the resolution as a framework to expand wellness programs and improve worker retention, but small, non-union employers may lack resources to act—leading to uneven adoption.

State government agencies and legislatorsMixed Impact

State agencies (e.g., DOH, ESD) may use this resolution to justify new data collection or pilot programs, but without appropriations, it remains symbolic unless paired with follow-up legislation.

Families and communities of construction workersPositive Impact

Families benefit from improved worker well-being and reduced suicide risk, but they cannot directly access services under this resolution—relying on employer or state action to translate intent into support.

Sponsors

Representative Leavitt(Democrat)District 28Primary
Representative Rule(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Representative Paul(Democrat)District 10Secondary
Representative Zahn(Democrat)District 41Secondary
Representative Berg(Democrat)District 44Secondary
Representative Pollet(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Callan(Democrat)District 5Secondary
Representative Schmidt(Republican)District 4Secondary
Representative Richards(Democrat)District 26Secondary
Representative Berry(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Salahuddin(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Ryu(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Simmons(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Schmick(Republican)District 9Secondary
Representative Nance(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Bernbaum(Democrat)District 24Secondary
Representative Bronoske(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Representative Hall(Democrat)District 5Secondary
Representative Fosse(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Santos(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Representative Macri(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Representative Obras(Democrat)District 33Secondary