Skip to main content

HR 4676

In Committee

House

Quebec

Recognizing the relationship between Washington and Québec.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 2, 2026
Last Action: February 3, 2026
Status: H Adopted

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This resolution formally recognizes and celebrates the strong and growing relationship between Washington State and the Province of Québec, highlighting economic ties, shared democratic values, and collaboration in key industries. It does not create new laws or funding but serves as a symbolic statement of support for continued partnership.

  • Formally recognizes the long-standing economic, political, environmental, and cultural ties between Washington State and the Province of Québec.
  • Acknowledges the opening of the Delegation of Québec in Seattle in May 2025 as a sign of Québec’s commitment to strengthening bilateral relations.
  • Highlights the role of over 30 Québec-based companies operating in Washington and their economic contributions to the state.
  • Notes that bilateral trade between Washington and Québec reached $850 million in 2024, emphasizing Québec as a key trading partner.
  • Affirms shared values and interests in sectors like clean energy, aerospace, artificial intelligence, transportation, life sciences, and advanced manufacturing.

Who is affected

  • Québec-based businesses in WashingtonQuébec-based companies operating in Washington benefit from formal recognition of their economic contributions and may gain increased visibility and support for future business expansion.
  • Washington state government agencies and officialsState agencies and officials involved in trade, economic development, and international relations may use this resolution to guide future collaboration efforts with Québec.
  • Workers and students in key economic sectorsWorkers and students in sectors like clean energy, aerospace, AI, and life sciences may benefit from expanded cross-border partnerships and opportunities.
  • General Washington residentsWashington residents and consumers may benefit indirectly from stronger trade ties, including more goods, services, and job opportunities linked to Québec.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:23 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Formal recognition may encourage further investment and trade expansion between Washington and Québec, potentially supporting jobs in export-oriented sectors like aerospace, clean energy, and life sciences — though actual job gains depend on subsequent policy actions.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Whereas clause 4 ($850M bilateral trade)
  • Québec-based companies in Washington may benefit from increased legitimacy and goodwill, possibly aiding recruitment, partnerships, and market access — but since these firms are often subsidiaries of large multinationals, the primary beneficiaries are corporate shareholders, not local workers.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Whereas clause 3 (30+ Québec companies)
  • The resolution may foster university-industry collaboration in high-demand fields, potentially supporting curriculum development and research partnerships — but without funding or mandates, this remains aspirational.

    EducationRef: Whereas clause 6 (clean energy, AI, aerospace, etc.)
  • Highlighting sectoral strengths may help attract talent and investment to Washington’s innovation economy, but again, this is symbolic — no concrete support (e.g., grants, training programs) is included.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Whereas clause 7 (shared expertise in key sectors)
  • The resolution affirms Washington’s commitment to inclusive, values-based international engagement, reinforcing civic norms of cooperation and mutual respect — though symbolic, it may influence state agency conduct in diplomatic outreach.

    Rights & LibertiesRef: Whereas clause 1 (long-standing ties)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The resolution may increase visibility for Québec-based companies operating in Washington, potentially leading to more business opportunities and job creation — but this effect is speculative and not guaranteed, as the resolution lacks enforcement mechanisms or funding.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Whereas clauses 1–7
  • State agencies involved in international economic development may reallocate staff time or resources to support follow-up initiatives tied to this resolution, but no funding is appropriated, so any cost would be minimal and internal.

    Local GovernmentRef: Whereas clauses 1–7
  • Increased cross-border institutional presence (e.g., Québec delegation in Seattle) could improve coordination on shared public safety issues (e.g., emergency response, cybersecurity), but the resolution does not establish any formal cooperation protocols, making this benefit highly speculative.

    Public SafetyRef: Whereas clause 2 (Delegation of Québec in Seattle)
  • Symbolic affirmation of shared democratic values may strengthen civic identity and cross-border trust, but as a non-binding resolution, it has no legal force and does not expand or restrict individual rights or liberties.

    Rights & LibertiesRef: Whereas clause 5 (shared democratic values)
  • The resolution has no fiscal impact — no new spending, taxation, or regulatory costs — so it imposes no direct financial burden or benefit on Washington taxpayers or households.

    FinancialRef: Entire resolution

Who Is Most Affected

Québec-based businesses in WashingtonMixed Impact

Québec-based companies in Washington may gain reputational benefits and increased visibility, potentially aiding business development — but most are subsidiaries of large multinationals, so the primary beneficiaries are corporate HQs and shareholders, not local employees.

Washington state government agencies and officialsMixed Impact

State agencies (e.g., Economic Development, Commerce) may use the resolution as a framework for future initiatives, but without new funding, staff time would be diverted at minimal cost — no net gain or loss for public employees.

Workers and students in key economic sectorsMixed Impact

Workers and students in targeted sectors (e.g., clean energy, AI) may benefit from expanded cross-border internships, research, or job opportunities — but these outcomes are uncertain and depend on future agreements, not this resolution alone.

General Washington residentsMixed Impact

General residents may see indirect benefits (e.g., more goods, jobs, or innovation) if trade expands, but the resolution itself does not guarantee any material change — effects are speculative and likely small.

Government of QuébecPositive Impact

Québec’s government gains a formal foothold in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, potentially enhancing its geopolitical influence — but this is a foreign government, not a Washington stakeholder in the domestic policy sense.

Sponsors

Representative Salahuddin(Democrat)District 48Primary
Representative Stearns(Democrat)District 47Secondary
Representative Mena(Democrat)District 29Secondary
Representative Cortes(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Berry(Democrat)District 36Secondary