HR 4617

In Committee

House

Children's day

Encouraging the celebration of Children's Day.

Introduced (completed)
2
Committee (current stage)
3
Floor Vote (not started)
4
Opposite Chamber (not started)
5
Governor (not started)
6
Signed (not started)

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?

Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
Signed: The bill has been signed into law.

Introduced: February 16, 2025

Last Action: February 17, 2025

Status: H Adopted

View Bill Text (HTML)View Bill Text (PDF)

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.

People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This resolution formally designates February 17, 2025, as Children's Day in Washington State and encourages residents to support children’s well-being and civic engagement. It celebrates youth involvement in the legislative process and reaffirms the state’s responsibility to prioritize children’s rights.

Declares February 17, 2025 as Children's Day in Washington State.
Recognizes the contributions of youth serving as legislative pages and interns in Olympia.
Encourages all Washington residents to support children’s health, safety, and education.
Affirms the state’s commitment to leaving the world better for future generations.
Highlights the importance of children’s perspectives and experiences in shaping a stronger democracy.

Who is affected

Children and students — Children and students in Washington are recognized as vital participants in democracy and society, with the resolution affirming their right to health, safety, and education.
Families and caregivers — Families and caregivers are encouraged to support and celebrate children, reinforcing community involvement in child well-being.
State employees and legislative staff — State employees and legislative staff who work with youth (e.g., page and internship program coordinators) benefit from increased visibility of the program’s value.
Educators and school staff — Educators and school staff may use the resolution as a platform to promote civic engagement and student leadership.

Effective: February 17, 2025

Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026, 8:21 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for concerns

Potential Concerns (5)

The resolution promotes civic engagement and youth participation in democracy, which may foster long-term improvements in community trust and reduce youth disengagement — though this is highly indirect and unmeasurable without additional policy mechanisms.
Public SafetyRef: Whereas clause: 'We can learn much from children...'
The resolution affirms children’s rights to health, safety, and education, reinforcing a moral and constitutional framing that could support future pro-child legislation — though it imposes no legal duties or enforcement mechanisms.
Rights & LibertiesRef: Whereas clause: 'It is our solemn obligation to reflect on our achievements and work towards the remaining progress needed to accomplish and fulfill the rights of every child...'
The resolution highlights the value of youth legislative internships and page programs, potentially increasing public support for those programs — but the resolution itself does not fund, expand, or mandate them.
EducationRef: Whereas clause: 'Students are here all session working diligently serving as pages and interns...'
Symbolic recognition of youth visitors may improve civic literacy and trust in government among participants — but this effect is self-selecting (only those who attend or are invited) and not generalizable to most Washington children.
Public SafetyRef: Whereas clause: 'We welcome to the House of Representatives the young people here today...'
The rhetorical framing may inspire intergenerational environmental stewardship values — but without binding policy, this remains aspirational and unlikely to alter behavior or policy outcomes.
EnvironmentRef: Whereas clause: 'We don't inherit the earth, we borrow it from our children'

Who Is Most Affected

Children and studentsMixed Impact
Children and students gain symbolic recognition and may benefit indirectly from increased attention to youth civic engagement, but the resolution does not provide new services, funding, or legal protections.
Families and caregiversMixed Impact
Families and caregivers may feel encouraged by the symbolic affirmation of child well-being, but no new financial or legal supports are created for them.
State employees and legislative staffMixed Impact
State employees involved in youth programs may benefit from increased visibility and legitimacy of their work, but no new funding or staffing is authorized.
Educators and school staffMixed Impact
Educators may use the resolution as a teaching tool for civics, but it does not mandate curriculum changes, professional development, or resources.

HR 4617

AI Analysis

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Concerns (5)

Who Is Most Affected

Sponsorsi

Sponsors