Skip to main content

HR 4611

In Committee

House

Washington National Guard

Honoring the Washington National Guard.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 28, 2025
Last Action: January 29, 2025
Status: H Adopted

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

House Resolution 4611 is a formal expression of appreciation and recognition by the Washington State House of Representatives for the Washington National Guard’s service in emergency response, national defense, and community programs. It highlights specific missions and contributions over recent years and affirms support for Guard members, their families, and employers.

  • Expresses formal appreciation from the Washington State House of Representatives to the families and employers of Washington National Guard members for their support.
  • Recognizes the Washington National Guard's role in emergency response, disaster relief, federal missions, and community programs like the Washington Youth ChalleNGe Academy.
  • Highlights specific examples of Guard service, including responses to 2022 floods in Lewis County and snowstorms in Leavenworth, 2023 wildfire support, and 2024 election cyber security efforts.
  • Acknowledges the role of the Western Regional Counterdrug Training Center in supporting law enforcement and community efforts against drug trafficking.
  • Affirms the value of National Guard Readiness Centers and armories in supporting community activities, education, and economic vitality.

Who is affected

  • Washington National Guard members and their familiesMembers of the Washington National Guard (soldiers and airmen) are recognized for their service in emergency response, federal missions, and community programs like the Washington Youth ChalleNGe Academy.
  • Employers of National Guard membersEmployers of National Guard members benefit from a trained, disciplined workforce and are acknowledged for supporting employees' military service.
  • Washington residents and local communitiesWashington communities benefit from Guard support during disasters (e.g., floods, wildfires), youth programs, and use of Readiness Centers for community activities.
  • State and federal government agenciesState and federal agencies receive support from the Guard in election security, emergency management, and counterdrug efforts.
Effective: 2025-01-29
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:21 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Formal legislative recognition of the Washington National Guard’s emergency response and disaster relief roles reinforces public confidence in state-level crisis management capacity and may encourage continued civic engagement and preparedness.

    Public SafetyRef: WHEREAS, ... express its thanks and appreciation to the devoted families and dedicated employers...
  • The resolution highlights the Washington Youth ChalleNGe Academy, a state-funded program for at-risk youth, and affirms its community value—though the resolution itself does not fund or alter the program, it may bolster political support for its continuation and expansion.

    EducationLean peopleRef: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ... recognize the value... of the Washington Youth ChalleNGe Academy
  • By affirming the role of Readiness Centers in community activities, the resolution may encourage local governments and community groups to partner more actively with the Guard—though this is symbolic, it could facilitate non-financial resource sharing (e.g., space, volunteers).

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ... use these facilities to enhance education, add to quality of life, and increase economic vitality
  • The resolution elevates visibility of a proven youth development program, potentially increasing public awareness and reducing stigma—though the resolution has no direct effect on program access or quality, symbolic support can influence public attitudes and volunteerism.

    EducationRef: WHEREAS, ... the Guard continues to improve the lives of Washington's young adults... through its Washington Youth ChalleNGe Academy
  • Recognition of the Guard’s election security role may reinforce trust in electoral integrity, especially in polarized environments—though the resolution itself does not change security protocols, it serves as public affirmation of a critical nonpartisan function.

    Public SafetyRef: WHEREAS, ... the Guard supported the Secretary of State to ensure the integrity of national, state, and local elections from cyber threats

Who Is Most Affected

Washington National Guard members and their familiesMixed Impact

Guard members and their families receive formal public acknowledgment, which may improve morale and social recognition; however, the resolution imposes no material change to benefits, pay, or deployment policies.

Employers of National Guard membersMixed Impact

Employers gain symbolic recognition for supporting employees’ military service, which may enhance their public image; however, no legal or financial incentives (e.g., tax credits, hiring preferences) are created.

Washington residents and local communitiesMixed Impact

Communities benefit from increased visibility of the Guard’s local contributions, potentially strengthening civic pride and encouraging volunteerism—but the resolution does not allocate new resources or change service delivery.

State and federal government agenciesMixed Impact

State agencies (e.g., Emergency Management Division, Secretary of State) receive public endorsement of interagency coordination, which may ease future collaboration—but the resolution does not alter operational authority or funding.

Sponsors

Representative Jinkins(Democrat)District 27Primary
Representative Stokesbary(Republican)District 31Secondary
Representative Abbarno(Republican)District 20Secondary
Representative Abell(Republican)District 7Secondary
Representative Barkis(Republican)District 2Secondary
Representative Barnard(Republican)District 8Secondary
Representative Berg(Democrat)District 44Secondary
Representative Bergquist(Democrat)District 11Secondary
Representative Bernbaum(Democrat)District 24Secondary
Representative Berry(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Bronoske(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Representative Burnett(Republican)District 12Secondary
Representative Valdez(Republican)District 26Secondary
Representative Callan(Democrat)District 5Secondary
Representative Chase(Republican)District 4Secondary
Representative Connors(Republican)District 8Secondary
Representative Corry(Republican)District 15Secondary
Representative Cortes(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Couture(Republican)District 35Secondary
Representative Davis(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Dent(Republican)District 13Secondary
Representative Doglio(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Donaghy(Democrat)District 44Secondary
Representative Duerr(Democrat)District 1Secondary
Representative Dufault(Republican)District 15Secondary
Representative Dye(Republican)District 9Secondary
Representative Engell(Republican)District 7Secondary
Representative Entenman(Democrat)District 47Secondary
Representative Eslick(Republican)District 39Secondary
Representative Farivar(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Fey(Democrat)District 27Secondary
Representative Fitzgibbon(Democrat)District 34Secondary
Representative Fosse(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Goodman(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Representative Graham(Republican)District 6Secondary
Representative Gregerson(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Griffey(Republican)District 35Secondary
Representative Hackney(Democrat)District 11Secondary
Representative Hill(Democrat)District 3Secondary
Senator Hunt(Democrat)District 5Secondary
Representative Jacobsen(Republican)District 25Secondary
Representative Keaton(Republican)District 25Secondary
Representative Klicker(Republican)District 16Secondary
Representative Kloba(Democrat)District 1Secondary
Representative Leavitt(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Representative Lekanoff(Democrat)District 40Secondary
Representative Ley(Republican)District 18Secondary
Representative Low(Republican)District 39Secondary
Representative Macri(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Representative Manjarrez(Republican)District 14Secondary
Representative Marshall(Republican)District 2Secondary
Representative McClintock(Republican)District 18Secondary
Representative McEntire(Republican)District 19Secondary
Representative Mena(Democrat)District 29Secondary
Representative Mendoza(Republican)District 14Secondary
Representative Morgan(Democrat)District 29Secondary
Representative Nance(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Obras(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Orcutt(Republican)District 20Secondary
Representative Ormsby(Democrat)District 3Secondary
Representative Ortiz-Self(Democrat)District 21Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Paul(Democrat)District 10Secondary
Representative Penner(Republican)District 31Secondary
Representative Peterson(Democrat)District 21Secondary
Representative Pollet(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Ramel(Democrat)District 40Secondary
Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Reeves(Democrat)District 30Secondary
Representative Richards(Democrat)District 26Secondary
Representative Rude(Republican)District 16Secondary
Representative Rule(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Representative Ryu(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Salahuddin(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Santos(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Representative Schmick(Republican)District 9Secondary
Representative Schmidt(Republican)District 4Secondary
Representative Scott(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Representative Shavers(Democrat)District 10Secondary
Representative Simmons(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Springer(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Representative Stearns(Democrat)District 47Secondary
Representative Steele(Republican)District 12Secondary
Representative Stonier(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Street(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Representative Stuebe(Republican)District 17Secondary
Representative Taylor(Democrat)District 30Secondary
Representative Thai(Democrat)District 41Secondary
Representative Tharinger(Democrat)District 24Secondary
Representative Thomas(Democrat)District 34Secondary
Representative Timmons(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Representative Volz(Republican)District 6Secondary
Representative Walen(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Walsh(Republican)District 19Secondary
Representative Waters(Republican)District 17Secondary
Representative Wylie(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Ybarra(Republican)District 13Secondary
Representative Zahn(Democrat)District 41Secondary