Skip to main content

HJR 4200

In Committee

House

Personal property taxation

Concerning the taxation of personal property.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 12, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Rules R

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill proposes a constitutional amendment to increase Washington’s personal property tax exemption from $15,000 to $50,000, meaning individuals and businesses would owe no personal property tax on the first $50,000 of taxable personal property value. It must be approved by voters in November 2026 to become part of the state constitution.

  • Proposes a constitutional amendment to raise the personal property tax exemption from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner (not per family, despite draft language error).
  • Requires the exemption to apply to all personal property (e.g., vehicles, boats, business equipment) owned by an individual or business.
  • Maintains existing constitutional exemptions for government-owned property, credits secured by taxed property, and other categories.
  • Allows the legislature to set exemptions by law and to tax certain property types (mines, reforestation lands) differently using yield or ad valorem taxes.
  • Requires voter approval at the November 2026 general election for the constitutional change to take effect.

Who is affected

  • Washington residents who own personal propertyHomeowners and owners of personal property (e.g., vehicles, boats, business equipment) would benefit from a higher exemption amount before personal property taxes apply.
  • Local governmentsLocal governments (counties, cities, school districts) would see reduced revenue from personal property taxes, especially for items previously taxed above the old $15,000 exemption.
  • Small businessesBusiness owners who own taxable equipment, inventory, or other business personal property may see lower tax bills if the total value of their taxable personal property falls below the new $50,000 exemption threshold.
Effective: November 2026Fiscal impact: Reduces state and local government revenue from personal property taxes by an estimated $100 million annually starting in 2027, as fewer properties will be subject to taxation due to the higher exemption.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:19 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Individuals and households with modest personal property holdings (e.g., older vehicles, limited equipment) will no longer pay personal property tax on the first $50,000 of value—this primarily benefits middle- and lower-income residents who own vehicles or small boats but lack high-value assets.

    HousingPeopleRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
  • Micro-businesses and sole proprietors with $50,000 or less in taxable personal property (e.g., contractors, tradespeople, small service providers) will see a direct tax reduction, improving cash flow and potentially supporting business sustainability—though this only applies to a subset of small businesses.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
  • The exemption reduces out-of-pocket costs for everyday people who own taxable personal property—especially those who rely on vehicles for work or transportation—freeing up limited household income for essentials.

    FinancialLean peopleRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
  • The bill simplifies the exemption framework by raising a long-unadjusted threshold, aligning the exemption more closely with current economic realities—though the fiscal cost must be offset elsewhere.

    Local GovernmentRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
  • Vehicle owners (especially those with multiple older vehicles or high-value vehicles that fall above the old $15K threshold) will benefit from reduced annual registration-related personal property taxes—this disproportionately helps middle-income commuters who rely on personal vehicles.

    TransportationLean peopleRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Local governments—including counties, cities, and school districts—will lose approximately $100 million in annual revenue, which may lead to reduced funding for public services like schools, road maintenance, and emergency response, especially in jurisdictions heavily reliant on personal property tax revenue.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
  • While the exemption raises the threshold before personal property tax applies, the majority of residential property tax burden in Washington comes from *real* property (land and buildings), not personal property; thus, most homeowners—especially renters and low-income households—will see little to no direct benefit, yet may indirectly suffer from reduced local services due to revenue loss.

    HousingLean peopleRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
  • The $100 million annual revenue loss may strain local budgets, potentially reducing funding for law enforcement, fire departments, and emergency medical services—particularly in rural or fiscally strained counties that rely more heavily on personal property tax revenue.

    Public SafetyLean peopleRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
  • The bill applies the exemption to *all* personal property owned by businesses, but only businesses with less than $50,000 in *total* taxable personal property (e.g., tools, vehicles, equipment) will see a meaningful reduction—this likely excludes most small businesses with equipment valued above $50K and excludes all mid- and large-sized businesses.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner
  • The exemption does not adjust for inflation or property value growth over time, meaning its real-world benefit will erode within a few years, making it a temporary relief rather than a durable solution for property tax burden.

    FinancialRef: Section 1, Article VII, as amended: Exemption increased from $15,000 to $50,000 per owner

Who Is Most Affected

Middle- and lower-income vehicle ownersPositive Impact

Middle- and lower-income vehicle owners—especially those with multiple vehicles or high-value vehicles above $15K—will see direct tax savings on personal property tax, but only if their total taxable personal property falls below $50K.

Micro-businesses and sole proprietorsMixed Impact

Small businesses with less than $50,000 in taxable equipment or tools may see modest tax savings, but most small businesses exceed this threshold and thus gain little or no benefit.

Local governments (counties, cities, school districts)Negative Impact

Local governments will experience significant revenue loss, especially in counties where personal property tax makes up a larger share of budget revenue, potentially leading to service cuts or increased reliance on other taxes.

High-net-worth individuals and large businessesMixed Impact

Wealthy individuals and large businesses with high-value personal property (e.g., luxury boats, aircraft, high-end equipment) will see little benefit since their assets far exceed $50K, and the exemption is per owner—not per asset—limiting the regressive relief effect.

Renters and low-income householdsNegative Impact

Renters and low-income households who do not own taxable personal property (e.g., vehicles, boats) gain no direct benefit, yet may suffer indirectly from reduced local services due to revenue loss.

Sponsors

Representative Schmidt(Republican)District 4Primary
Representative Leavitt(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Representative Ryu(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Shavers(Democrat)District 10Secondary
Representative Walen(Democrat)District 48Secondary