Skip to main content

HB 2722

In Committee

House

Vehicle fees/maximum weight

Increasing the maximum weight of certain vehicles subject to transportation benefit district vehicle fees.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 3, 2026
Last Action: February 9, 2026
Status: H Rules R
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill clarifies and adjusts the authority of Transportation Benefit Districts (TBDs) in Washington to impose annual vehicle fees on registered vehicles, with a maximum fee of $100 per vehicle, and allows for layered fees up to $50 under specific conditions. It also sets rules for how fees are collected, distributed, and what vehicles are exempt.

  • Allows Transportation Benefit Districts (TBDs) to impose an annual vehicle fee of up to $100 per vehicle (up from the previous cap of $100—note: the bill text shows no change to the $100 cap, but increases allowed under subsection (2)).
  • Permits TBDs to impose up to $20, $40, or $50 of the fee depending on how long lower-tier fees have been in place and whether certain conditions are met (e.g., meeting requirements in RCW 36.73.065(6)).
  • If a countywide TBD wants to impose a fee, it must get approval from a majority of its governing board and, for new fees, approval from 60% of cities representing 75% of the population in the cities within the district.
  • Bars TBDs from combining fees with other districts to exceed $50 total per vehicle, and requires credits to ensure the combined fee does not exceed that cap.
  • Requires voter approval for fees used specifically for passenger-only ferry projects.
  • Exempts certain vehicles—including campers, farm tractors, mopeds, off-road vehicles, snowmobiles, and single-axle trailers—from the fee.

Who is affected

  • Transportation Benefit Districts (TBDs)Residents and businesses in areas with a Transportation Benefit District (TBD) may face higher vehicle registration fees when renewing their vehicle registration, depending on how much the TBD has authorized and whether it meets certain conditions.
  • Vehicle owners (especially those with heavier personal or commercial vehicles)Vehicles with a gross weight of 10,000 pounds or less that are registered in Washington and subject to standard vehicle license fees or gross weight fees may be charged an additional annual fee if they are within a TBD's jurisdiction.
  • Local governments (cities and counties)Cities and counties within a countywide TBD may need to negotiate how fee revenue is shared, and cities must approve fee increases under specific conditions if the TBD is countywide.
  • Department of LicensingThe Department of Licensing will collect the fees and remit them to the state, which then distributes them monthly to the respective TBDs.
Fiscal impact: The bill allows Transportation Benefit Districts to collect up to $100 per vehicle annually (up from the previous $100 cap, though the text shows no increase in the cap itself—see note below), with additional layers allowing up to $50 total in fees per vehicle depending on prior fees and voter approval. Revenue goes to the state treasury and is distributed monthly to the respective TBDs. The Department of Licensing may retain up to 1% of collected fees for administrative costs.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:16 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Enables targeted, performance-based fee increases up to $50 for districts that have sustained lower-tier fees for 2+ years and meet specific transportation planning requirements (e.g., multimodal investment plans), potentially funding safer streets, bike lanes, and transit that benefit everyday commuters.

    TransportationPeopleRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(2)(a)(iii) & RCW 36.73.065(6)
  • Bars cumulative fees above $50 per vehicle across districts and mandates automatic credits to prevent overcollection, protecting residents from being charged more than the statutory cap even when multiple districts overlap.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(2)(b)(ii)
  • Provides a graduated, transparent fee schedule that allows TBDs to incrementally increase revenue as infrastructure needs grow and communities demonstrate long-term commitment to transportation improvements—supporting predictable, phased investment in roads and transit.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(2)(a)(i)-(iii)
  • Requires voter approval for fees used specifically for passenger-only ferry projects, ensuring democratic accountability for major capital investments in regional ferry systems that serve island and coastal communities.

    TransportationLean peopleRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(2)(b)(i)
  • Standardizes fee collection through the Department of Licensing and mandates monthly remittance to TBDs, improving cash flow predictability for local transportation projects and reducing administrative fragmentation.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(3)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Imposes an additional $100 annual fee on most registered vehicles in TBD jurisdictions, effectively increasing transportation-related costs for vehicle owners regardless of income level.

    FinancialRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(1)
  • Allows layered fees up to $50 on top of the base $100 fee for districts meeting multi-year fee thresholds and performance conditions, potentially raising total fees to $150 per vehicle—though the $50 cap on *combined* fees (Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(2)(b)(ii)) limits this to $150 only if the base $100 is already in place and a prior $50 fee exists elsewhere.

    FinancialRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(2)(a)(iii)
  • Requires complex interlocal agreements and supermajority city approvals (60% of cities representing 75% of population) for countywide TBD fee increases, increasing administrative burden and potentially delaying or blocking needed transportation investments in multi-jurisdictional areas.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(2)(b)(ii)
  • Ties fee collection strictly to vehicle registration renewals, meaning low-income or infrequent drivers may face sudden, large lump-sum costs rather than spreading costs over time—disproportionately affecting cash-constrained households.

    FinancialRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(5)
  • Exempts only niche vehicle types (campers, farm tractors, mopeds, off-road vehicles, snowmobiles, single-axle trailers), leaving most standard passenger and commercial vehicles subject to the fee—no income-based exemptions or sliding-scale relief.

    FinancialRef: Sec. 1, RCW 82.80.140(6)

Who Is Most Affected

Vehicle owners in TBD jurisdictionsMixed Impact

Residents in TBD jurisdictions face a new or increased annual vehicle fee (up to $150 total), which may strain household budgets—especially for low- and middle-income drivers who rely on personal vehicles due to limited transit access. However, they may benefit from improved local roads, bike lanes, or transit if fee revenue is well-managed.

Local governments (cities and counties)Mixed Impact

Cities and counties within countywide TBDs gain new authority to fund transportation projects, but must navigate complex interlocal negotiations and supermajority voter approval thresholds for fee increases—potentially slowing project timelines and creating inequitable access to funding across jurisdictions.

Transportation Benefit Districts (TBDs)Positive Impact

TBDs gain clearer authority to impose and layer fees, improving their ability to plan and fund transportation infrastructure. However, the $50 cap on combined fees and voter approval requirements for ferry projects constrain their flexibility and revenue potential.

Department of LicensingMixed Impact

The Department of Licensing gains administrative responsibility for collecting and distributing fees, with a 1% administrative retention—adding modest operational complexity but no significant new costs or revenue.

Low- and moderate-income householdsNegative Impact

Low-income households, renters, and those without access to public transit are disproportionately affected by the fee since it applies uniformly and offers no income-based exemptions—while wealthier households can more easily absorb the cost or avoid driving.

Sponsors

Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Primary
Representative Scott(Democrat)District 43Secondary