Skip to main content

HB 2721

In Committee

House

Comm. interior designers

Concerning registered commercial interior designers.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 3, 2026
Last Action: February 4, 2026
Status: H ConsPro&Bus

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill establishes a state registration program for commercial interior designers in Washington to protect public health, safety, and welfare by regulating nonstructural interior design work. It defines the scope of practice, creates a new board to oversee the profession, and sets licensing, renewal, and enforcement requirements.

  • Creates a new regulatory framework for 'registered commercial interior designers' in Washington, requiring individuals and firms to be licensed to practice and use that title.
  • Defines the 'practice of registered commercial interior design' as limited to nonstructural interior work (e.g., partitions, finishes, millwork, egress planning) and explicitly excludes structural, envelope, or life-safety systems work.
  • Establishes a new nine-member board (six architects, two interior designers, one public member) under the Department of Licensing to oversee both architecture and registered commercial interior design.
  • Sets qualification requirements including education, experience, passing the NCIDQ exam, and a Washington-specific law exam; architects may qualify via simplified process.
  • Requires firms to register and designate a registered designer in responsible charge; prohibits furniture/fixture sellers from registering as design firms.
  • Imposes penalties for unlicensed practice (misdemeanor, up to $1,000 civil penalty) and requires licensees to maintain records and follow ethical standards.

Who is affected

  • Commercial interior designersInterior designers who want to use the title 'registered commercial interior designer' and perform commercial interior design work affecting public health and safety must now be licensed by the state.
  • Interior design firms and business entitiesFirms offering interior design services must register with the state and ensure their lead designers are registered; certain design-related businesses (e.g., furniture sellers) are excluded from registration.
  • Architects and engineersArchitects and engineers who perform interior design work must now separately register as registered commercial interior designers if they wish to use that title, though they are exempt from full experience/exam requirements.
  • General public and building usersClients and the general public benefit from increased accountability and oversight of professionals performing interior design work that impacts safety, accessibility, and building code compliance.
  • State regulatory agenciesState agencies (e.g., Department of Licensing, Board for Architects and Registered Commercial Interior Designers) gain new regulatory responsibilities and authority over the profession.
Effective: July 28, 2026Fiscal impact: The bill creates a new license account to collect fees (including a $6.50 per certificate fee) to fund administration of the registration program; the Department of Licensing will incur costs to implement oversight, though fees are expected to cover those costs.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:16 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • By requiring registration and oversight for interior designers performing egress planning, occupant load calculations, and life safety assessments in commercial settings, the bill enhances accountability and reduces the risk of unsafe building occupancy—particularly benefiting building users, including people with disabilities, who rely on code-compliant egress systems.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(16)(vii); Sec. 3(2)(b); Sec. 1(2)
  • The bill establishes clear accountability for firms by requiring them to register, designate a responsible-charge designer, and maintain records—providing clients and the public with greater assurance of professional responsibility and reducing the risk of fraud or substandard work, especially benefiting small businesses and consumers seeking reliable design services.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 8(1); Sec. 8(3); Sec. 7(3)(a)-(d)
  • Architects and engineers can register with a simplified process and satisfy renewal through their existing license—reducing redundant administrative burden while maintaining oversight, and supporting interdisciplinary collaboration without requiring redundant training or exams for licensed professionals already in good standing.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 4(6); Sec. 6(4)(ii)
  • The bill creates strong enforcement mechanisms—including misdemeanor penalties, civil fines up to $1,000, and injunction authority—to deter unlicensed practice, which strengthens public protection and deters unqualified individuals from performing interior design work that affects safety, especially benefiting low-income tenants and public building users who are most vulnerable to substandard design.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 11(1); Sec. 10(1); Sec. 11(2)-(3)
  • The $6.50 per-certificate fee deposited into the Building Code Council Account supports consistent funding for code-related activities, and the fee-based structure aims to make the program self-sustaining—reducing reliance on general fund support while ensuring dedicated resources for oversight, benefiting state and local governments managing building safety.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 17(3); Sec. 13
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The bill explicitly excludes interior designers from performing engineering-level seismic analysis, structural calculations, or life-safety system design—yet still allows them to coordinate with structural engineers and sign off on prescriptive seismic anchorage documentation. This creates ambiguity about the boundary between interior design and engineering, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement and risk of unsafe installations if designers overstep their scope without adequate oversight.

    Public SafetyRef: Sec. 2(16)(i)-(vi); Sec. 3(2)(h)-(i)
  • The bill prohibits furniture/fixture sellers from registering as design firms, which may limit business model flexibility for integrated retail-design firms and could reduce consumer access to bundled procurement and design services—though it aims to prevent conflicts of interest, the restriction may disproportionately affect small, hybrid-service businesses that rely on both functions.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 8(2); Sec. 2(13)
  • The requirement for NCIDQ certification, a Washington-specific law exam, and continuing professional development creates barriers to entry for aspiring designers—especially those from lower-income backgrounds or rural areas—by increasing time, cost, and geographic constraints, potentially reducing workforce diversity and limiting competition in the field.

    EducationRef: Sec. 4(1)(c)-(d); Sec. 4(2); Sec. 6(4)(i)
  • The prohibition on accepting indirect compensation from third parties (e.g., manufacturers, suppliers) may restrict revenue models for designers who rely on vendor rebates, commissions, or product sourcing fees—particularly affecting solo practitioners and small firms that lack diversified revenue streams, while larger firms with in-house procurement teams may adapt more easily.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 11(4); Sec. 10(2)(f)
  • The broad exemptions for residential projects (up to 4 units), small commercial projects (≤4,000 sq ft), and farm buildings allow unlicensed individuals to perform interior design work that could impact public safety—undermining the bill’s stated purpose of protecting public health and safety and creating a two-tiered system where safety oversight is inconsistent across project types.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 3(4)(f)-(g); Sec. 3(4)(e)

Who Is Most Affected

Commercial interior designersMixed Impact

Commercial interior designers gain legal recognition and authority to perform regulated work, but must meet new education, experience, and exam requirements. While this raises professional standing and public trust, it also increases barriers to entry and operational costs—especially for new designers and small firms.

Interior design firms and business entitiesMixed Impact

Interior design firms gain formal recognition and legal standing, but must register as entities, designate a registered designer in responsible charge, and comply with recordkeeping and ethical rules. Furniture/fixture sellers are excluded, limiting business model options—though existing design departments within retail firms may benefit from clearer professional boundaries.

Architects and engineersPositive Impact

Architects and engineers gain streamlined access to interior design registration but must now register separately to use the title. This expands their scope of practice without major new burdens, and may increase demand for integrated design services—benefiting larger firms with multidisciplinary practices.

General public and building usersPositive Impact

The general public benefits from increased accountability and standardized safety oversight in commercial interior design—especially in areas like egress planning, fire protection coordination, and accessible design. However, the bill’s exemptions for small/residential projects may limit consistent safety protections across all building types.

State regulatory agenciesPositive Impact

The Department of Licensing and the new board gain expanded regulatory authority and fee-based funding. While this increases administrative responsibilities, the self-funding mechanism and existing infrastructure (shared board with architects) reduce net fiscal burden on state agencies.

Sponsors

Representative Volz(Republican)District 6Primary
Representative Zahn(Democrat)District 41Secondary