Skip to main content

HB 2645

In Committee

House

SR 165 replacements

Addressing the emergency replacement of failed infrastructure on state route number 165.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 22, 2026
Last Action: January 23, 2026
Status: H Transportation

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill responds to the April 22, 2025, collapse and closure of the Fairfax bridge on State Route 165 by giving WSDOT emergency powers to quickly build a replacement—bypassing some rules that could slow the project—while still protecting federal funding and constitutional rights. It takes effect immediately to ensure fast restoration of a critical transportation link.

  • Declares the April 22, 2025, permanent closure of the Fairfax bridge on State Route 165 an emergency requiring immediate action.
  • Directs the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to restore access across the Carbon River as soon as possible.
  • Grants the Transportation Secretary emergency authority to waive or suspend certain state laws and regulations—including those about interlocal agreements, inspection fees, utility commission rules, and tax deadlines—if strict adherence would delay emergency response.
  • Limits the waiver power: it cannot override federal requirements tied to federal funding or violate First Amendment rights (free speech or assembly).
  • Requires WSDOT to notify the governor, legislative transportation committee leaders, and local governments before issuing emergency orders.
  • States that emergency actions under this bill are exempt from Executive Order 25-07, which normally governs environmental review processes.

Who is affected

  • Residents and commuters in Pierce and King CountiesResidents and commuters who rely on State Route 165 for travel across the Carbon River will regain access quickly after the Fairfax bridge closure; local emergency services and freight carriers will also benefit from restored access.
  • Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)Will use emergency authority to fast-track planning and construction of a bridge replacement, with flexibility to bypass certain rules to avoid delays.
  • Local governments (e.g., City of Ravensdale, unincorporated Pierce County)May be consulted or notified by WSDOT before emergency actions are taken, and could be impacted if local road connections or services depend on SR 165 access.
  • Washington State Department of Labor & Industries and Utilities and Transportation CommissionMay face reduced or waived inspection fees during the emergency response, and may see expedited project timelines that affect their regulatory processes.
Effective: 2026-01-23Fiscal impact: The bill does not specify funding or cost, but authorizes WSDOT to proceed with emergency bridge replacement without being slowed by typical procurement or regulatory delays; costs would likely be covered by existing transportation funds or future federal/state appropriations.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:11 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • The bill enables rapid restoration of a critical regional corridor (SR 165), directly benefiting daily commuters, emergency responders, and freight movement in Pierce and King Counties—restoring access within weeks rather than months or years.

    TransportationPeopleRef: Sec. 1–2
  • Waiver of liability for interlocal agreements removes a common bureaucratic barrier to coordination between WSDOT and local jurisdictions, enabling faster joint decision-making on road connections and access points.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 3(3)(a)
  • Mandatory notification to the governor, legislative leadership, and local governments ensures transparency and allows for timely legislative or community oversight—even if not binding, it creates accountability pressure during emergency response.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 3(4)
  • Explicit prohibition on waiving First Amendment rights prevents the state from using emergency powers to restrict protest or assembly near the construction site or in affected communities, protecting civil liberties during rapid development.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 3(3)(ii)
  • The limitation that waivers cannot conflict with federal funding conditions helps preserve eligibility for critical federal highway safety and infrastructure grants, indirectly supporting long-term public safety and project viability.

    Public SafetyLean peopleRef: Sec. 3(3)(i)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Waiver of inspection fees and regulatory oversight (e.g., L&I, Utilities and Transportation Commission) may reduce quality control and safety monitoring during rapid bridge construction, increasing risk of substandard work or future failures—especially concerning given the bridge’s catastrophic collapse.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3(3)(e)
  • Exemption from Executive Order 25-07 (environmental review) removes mandatory assessment of impacts on the Carbon River watershed, floodplains, and wildlife habitat, potentially allowing construction that degrades local ecosystems without mitigation.

    EnvironmentPeopleRef: Sec. 3(5)
  • While local governments are to be notified, the bill gives them no formal role in decision-making or veto power over emergency orders, weakening local input on infrastructure that directly affects their jurisdictions (e.g., Ravensdale, unincorporated Pierce County).

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 3(3)(e)
  • Waiver of tax due dates and penalties may reduce short-term state revenue collection, and while not targeted at individuals, it sets a precedent for bypassing tax enforcement during emergencies—potentially eroding revenue stability over time.

    FinancialLean peopleRef: Sec. 3(3)(d)
  • The broad waiver power could be used to suspend prevailing wage rules or labor protections under the guise of expediting construction, though the bill does not explicitly authorize that—making this a speculative but plausible risk.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 3(3)(e)

Who Is Most Affected

Residents and commuters in Pierce and King CountiesPositive Impact

Daily commuters and local residents in the Ravensdale and Black Diamond area regain reliable access to jobs, schools, and emergency services quickly—avoiding multi-hour detours on I-405 or SR 167.

Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)Mixed Impact

WSDOT gains operational flexibility to avoid procurement delays, but also assumes greater discretion with limited oversight—potentially reducing accountability for cost overruns or construction quality.

Local governments (e.g., City of Ravensdale, unincorporated Pierce County)Negative Impact

Local governments (e.g., City of Ravensdale) receive notice and can raise concerns, but have no formal authority to block or modify emergency actions—leaving them vulnerable to top-down decisions that may not align with local planning goals.

Washington State Department of Labor & Industries and Utilities and Transportation CommissionNegative Impact

L&I and the Utilities and Transportation Commission lose authority to collect inspection fees and enforce certain regulations during the emergency—reducing their revenue and weakening routine oversight capacity.

Construction and infrastructure contractorsMixed Impact

Construction firms bidding on the replacement bridge may benefit from expedited contracting processes, but the lack of environmental review or competitive bidding safeguards could favor large, politically connected contractors over local or minority-owned firms.

Sponsors

Representative Barkis(Republican)District 2Primary
Representative Penner(Republican)District 31Secondary
Representative Jacobsen(Republican)District 25Secondary