Skip to main content

HB 2512

In Committee

House

Real estate/exclusive market

Prohibiting real estate brokers from marketing residential properties to an exclusive group of prospective buyers or real estate brokers.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 14, 2026
Last Action: January 15, 2026
Status: H ConsPro&Bus
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill bans real estate brokers from marketing residential properties only to a select group of buyers or other brokers unless the property is also openly marketed to the public and all brokers. It also updates disclosure requirements for real estate agents and strengthens anti-discrimination protections in real estate transactions.

  • Prohibits real estate brokers from marketing residential properties to an exclusive or limited group of buyers or other brokers unless the property is also marketed to the general public and all brokers.
  • Allows limited marketing only if reasonably necessary to protect the health or safety of the owner or occupant.
  • Amends the required real estate brokerage pamphlet to improve readability (e.g., legible font and size) and clarify agency relationships, duties, and compensation rules.
  • Makes it an unfair practice under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (Chapter 49.60 RCW) for licensees to market residential property exclusively to certain groups, reinforcing the new marketing rule with civil rights enforcement tools.
  • Requires written services agreements to include specific details such as term, appointed brokers, exclusivity, consent to limited dual agency, and compensation terms.

Who is affected

  • Real estate brokers and brokeragesReal estate brokers must ensure all residential property listings are made available to the general public and all other brokers, limiting their ability to target only select groups.
  • Homebuyers and rentersHomebuyers and renters gain broader access to property listings and protection from being excluded based on group membership or demographics.
  • Homeowners and landlordsHomeowners and landlords must ensure their properties are marketed broadly unless health or safety concerns justify limited marketing.
  • State regulatory agenciesThe Washington State Department of Licensing gains enforcement authority over violations of the new marketing rule and related disclosure requirements.
Effective: July 1, 2026Fiscal impact: Minimal fiscal impact expected; potential increase in enforcement activities by the Department of Licensing related to compliance with the new marketing rule and updated disclosure pamphlet.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:03 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Prohibits discriminatory marketing practices that exclude buyers/renters based on group identity (e.g., race, religion, sexual orientation), reinforcing fair housing rights and expanding equitable access to housing opportunities.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 1; Sec. 4(3)
  • Improves consumer understanding of agency relationships, duties, and compensation through clearer, more accessible language — helps reduce information asymmetry and empowers homebuyers and sellers to make informed decisions.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 3 (pamphlet readability and clarity improvements)
  • Mandates written agreements with specific terms (e.g., exclusivity, compensation, limited dual agency consent), reducing ambiguity and potential disputes over broker compensation or representation — benefits consumers and small brokers alike by setting clear expectations.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 3 (written services agreement requirements)
  • Strengthens civil rights enforcement by making discriminatory marketing an unfair practice under state anti-discrimination law — enables stronger remedies (e.g., civil penalties, injunctive relief) and deters exclusionary practices that undermine community stability.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 4(3) (adding marketing restriction to Washington Law Against Discrimination)
  • Ensures all residential listings are available to all brokers and the public, expanding access to housing for historically marginalized groups (e.g., low-income, racial minorities, immigrants) who may be excluded from private or selective marketing networks.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 1 (public marketing requirement)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Limits brokers’ discretion to market properties to specific networks (e.g., private social or cultural groups), potentially reducing targeted outreach that some homeowners or landlords may use to reach trusted communities or avoid unwanted attention — though this benefit is outweighed by broader nondiscrimination goals.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 1; Sec. 4(3)
  • Increases compliance burden on brokers and brokerages through new marketing and disclosure requirements, including mandatory written agreements with specific clauses — may disproportionately impact small independent brokers and micro-businesses with limited administrative capacity.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 2 (cross-referencing violation enforcement)
  • Requires brokers to provide more detailed disclosures and written agreements, increasing transactional complexity and potential for liability — may delay closings or increase legal risk for brokers, especially in fast-paced markets.

    Business & EmploymentLean peopleRef: Sec. 3 (pamphlet updates and written agreement requirements)
  • Shifts enforcement responsibility to the Department of Licensing, potentially increasing regulatory costs for state agencies — though fiscal impact is projected minimal, local real estate associations may face increased complaints or disputes over marketing practices.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 4(3) and Sec. 2 (violation enforcement)
  • The health/safety exception is vague and could be subject to inconsistent interpretation — may lead to disputes over whether limited marketing was “reasonably necessary,” especially in cases involving vulnerable populations (e.g., domestic violence victims).

    Rights & LibertiesLean peopleRef: Sec. 1 (health/safety exception)

Who Is Most Affected

Homebuyers and rentersPositive Impact

Homebuyers and renters benefit significantly — broader access to listings and stronger protections against exclusionary marketing practices improve housing equity and opportunity.

Homeowners and landlordsMixed Impact

Homeowners and landlords gain protection from discriminatory practices but must ensure broad marketing unless health/safety concerns justify limited outreach — net effect is mixed but leans positive due to reduced risk of bias in offers and negotiations.

Real estate brokers and brokeragesNegative Impact

Real estate brokers face new compliance obligations (e.g., written agreements, public marketing rules) that increase administrative and legal risk, especially for small firms — though larger brokerages with compliance infrastructure may adapt more easily.

State regulatory agenciesMixed Impact

State regulatory agencies gain expanded enforcement authority under anti-discrimination law, aligning with existing civil rights mandates — minimal fiscal impact expected but may require training and oversight resources.

Mortgage and title industryMixed Impact

Mortgage lenders and title insurers may benefit indirectly from more transparent transactions and reduced risk of disputes, but face no direct obligations under the bill.

Sponsors

Representative Peterson(Democrat)District 21Primary
Representative Connors(Republican)District 8Secondary
Representative Springer(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Representative Kloba(Democrat)District 1Secondary
Representative Barkis(Republican)District 2Secondary
Representative Reeves(Democrat)District 30Secondary
Representative Leavitt(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Representative Hill(Democrat)District 3Secondary