Skip to main content

HB 2291

In Committee

House

Kratom

Establishing the kratom consumer protection act.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 11, 2026
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H ConsPro&Bus

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill establishes a regulatory framework for kratom in Washington State, treating it like other regulated consumer products. It requires licensing for sellers and processors, bans sales to minors, mandates product testing and labeling, and imposes a new 11% excise tax to fund youth prevention programs.

  • Creates a new licensing system requiring kratom retailers and processors to obtain state licenses from the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board, including criminal background checks.
  • Prohibits sale of kratom to anyone under age 21, with penalties including civil infractions for minors and fines or license suspension for sellers.
  • Requires product testing by independent labs, child-resistant packaging, and specific labeling (e.g., age restriction, pregnancy warnings, serving size limits).
  • Bans certain product types: those containing synthesized kratom alkaloids, 7-hydroxymitragynine levels over 2% of alkaloids, products attractive to children, combustible/vaporizable forms, or products not approved and listed in the state’s official directory.
  • Imposes a 11% excise tax on kratom sales, with revenue going to a dedicated account for youth substance prevention and program administration.
  • Establishes enforcement tools including inspections, seizures, civil and criminal penalties, and license suspension/revocation for violations.

Who is affected

  • Kratom retailersMust obtain a state-issued license to legally sell kratom products; must comply with age verification, display, and storage rules; and may face fines or license suspension for violations.
  • Kratom processorsMust obtain a license, submit product testing and labeling information to the state, and ensure products meet safety and labeling standards; may face penalties or license revocation for noncompliance.
  • Consumers under age 21Must be at least 21 years old to purchase kratom products; may face a civil infraction and community service if under 21 and attempting to buy or possess kratom.
  • State of Washington (through the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board and Department of Revenue)Will receive tax revenue from kratom sales to fund youth substance prevention programs, and may be involved in enforcement or inspections.
Effective: 2027-01-01Fiscal impact: A 11% excise tax on kratom product sales will be collected, with all revenue deposited into the Youth Regulated Substance Prevention Account. Of this, 25% will fund administration of the law and 75% will fund public health education and interventions. The bill also creates a $1,000 license fee for each kratom retailer and processor license (plus $1,000 per additional business location).
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 7:47 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • The age restriction (21+) and penalties for sales to minors significantly reduce youth access to kratom, protecting adolescents from potential harms like gastrointestinal distress, dependency, or interactions with developing neurobiology—especially important given kratom’s use as an unregulated self-medication tool among teens seeking relief from anxiety or pain.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 6(1), Sec. 10(1)
  • Mandatory independent lab testing and caps on 7-hydroxymitragynine (≤2% of alkaloid fraction) reduce risks of adulterated, contaminated, or dangerously potent products entering the market—protecting consumers from harmful or lethal variants that have circulated in the unregulated space.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 14(1), Sec. 18, Sec. 19
  • Standardized labeling (e.g., pregnancy warnings, habit-forming notice, serving size limits) and child-resistant packaging improve consumer awareness and reduce accidental ingestion or misuse—especially important for vulnerable groups like pregnant people or those on concurrent medications.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 15(1)–(10), Sec. 16
  • Dedicated funding (75% of tax revenue) for public health education and interventions creates a sustainable, state-funded prevention infrastructure focused on substance use—targeting not just kratom but broader regulated substances, with potential spillover benefits for opioid and alcohol harm reduction.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 28(3), Sec. 30(2)
  • Tiered penalties—including license suspension for repeated violations of age restrictions—create strong incentives for retailers to enforce compliance, reducing illegal sales and supporting responsible retail practices without over-criminalizing minor infractions.

    Public SafetyLean peopleRef: Sec. 24(2)(c), Sec. 24(2)(d)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The 11% kratom excise tax will increase consumer prices at point of sale, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income users who rely on kratom for self-managed wellness or pain relief—many of whom are not using it recreationally but as an alternative to prescription opioids or over-the-counter analgesics. While revenue is dedicated to prevention programs, the tax burden falls directly on consumers, not producers or distributors.

    FinancialLean industryRef: Sec. 28(1)
  • The $1,000 per-location license fee and strict licensing requirements—including criminal background checks and separate retailer/processor licensing—create high barriers to entry, effectively excluding small, independent kratom shops and micro-businesses. Large chains or well-capitalized distributors are better positioned to absorb these costs, consolidating market share and reducing competition.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 2(3), Sec. 24(1)(e)
  • The ban on products “attractive to children” and the requirement to list all alkaloids—including 7-hydroxymitragynine—on labels will force many existing small-batch producers to reformulate or discontinue products, disproportionately impacting mom-and-pop kratom retailers and local manufacturers who lack R&D resources to comply with testing and labeling mandates.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 14(6), Sec. 15(10)
  • The ban on internet/mail-order sales and free samples eliminates a key channel for small operators to reach rural or underserved communities, where physical storefronts may not be viable. This favors large, brick-and-mortar chains with multiple locations and suppresses innovation in direct-to-consumer models.

    Business & EmploymentLean industryRef: Sec. 12(1), Sec. 13
  • The $50–$100 civil penalties for unlicensed violations (e.g., unlicensed resellers or informal vendors) are regressive, disproportionately impacting low-income individuals who may sell small quantities to support themselves—often in communities where access to licensed retailers is limited.

    FinancialLean industryRef: Sec. 24(6)

Who Is Most Affected

Small kratom retailersNegative Impact

Small, independent kratom retailers—often family-run shops in rural or suburban areas—will face high licensing costs ($1,000 per location), strict display and packaging rules, and loss of online sales, threatening viability. Many lack the capital to absorb compliance costs or adapt supply chains.

Kratom consumers (especially low-income)Mixed Impact

Low- and middle-income kratom users—many using it for self-managed pain, anxiety, or opioid withdrawal—will pay higher prices due to the 11% tax and may lose access if local shops close or consolidate. However, they benefit from safer, standardized products and reduced youth access.

Large kratom distributors and chainsPositive Impact

Large national distributors and vertically integrated chains (e.g., those already licensed for cannabis or tobacco) are best positioned to absorb licensing, testing, and compliance costs. They may gain market share as smaller competitors exit, consolidating the industry.

Youth under 21Mixed Impact

Youth and adolescents benefit from reduced access and exposure to kratom, lowering risks of early use and dependency. However, some may lose access to a harm-reduction tool they use for self-medication, especially in areas with limited healthcare access.

State of Washington (Liquor and Cannabis Board, Department of Revenue)Positive Impact

The state gains dedicated revenue for prevention programs and improved regulatory oversight, but the tax structure shifts costs to consumers and small businesses rather than large producers. Enforcement capacity will be needed to monitor compliance across a now-regulated market.

Sponsors

Representative Reeves(Democrat)District 30Primary
Representative Stonier(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Leavitt(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Representative Gregerson(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Goodman(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Representative Fosse(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Pollet(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Bernbaum(Democrat)District 24Secondary