Skip to main content

HB 2212

In Committee

House

Washing machine microplastic

Reducing microplastic pollution from washing machines.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 11, 2026
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Env & Energy

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill requires microfiber filters on new commercial and industrial washing machines starting in 2028 to reduce plastic pollution entering waterways from laundry. It also sets a path for future rules requiring such filters on new residential machines, and gives the Department of Ecology authority to enforce the requirements and penalize violations. The goal is to reduce microplastic contamination in Washington’s waterways and drinking water.

  • Requires that all new commercial and industrial washing machines sold or offered for sale in Washington on or after July 1, 2028, must be equipped with a certified microfiber filtration system (at least 87% capture rate, ≤100-micron mesh) and display a warning label.
  • Requires owners or operators of existing commercial and industrial washing machines to install a functioning microfiber filtration system by July 1, 2034.
  • Authorizes the Department of Ecology to adopt rules by July 1, 2030 requiring new residential washing machines to include microfiber filters — but only if another state (or a neighboring state) has a similar law and the cost increase to consumers is ≤10% or ≤$70 per machine.
  • Grants the Department of Ecology authority to issue corrective action orders and impose civil penalties of up to $5,000 for first violations and $10,000 for repeat violations, with appeals handled by the Pollution Control Hearings Board.
  • Requires regular inspection and proper disposal of captured lint from filters, and mandates that filters be functional during all wash cycles.

Who is affected

  • Commercial and industrial laundry operatorsBusinesses and facilities operating commercial or industrial washing machines (e.g., laundromats, hotels, hospitals, multifamily housing complexes) must install and maintain approved filters starting in 2028 (for new machines) or 2034 (for existing machines).
  • Washing machine manufacturersManufacturers of new washing machines must equip commercial and industrial models with certified microfiber filters starting July 1, 2028, and may be required to do so for residential models after 2030 if certain conditions are met.
  • Residential consumersResidents who use residential washing machines may face higher upfront costs for new machines if filters become required, though costs are expected to decrease over time as standards expand nationally.
  • State environmental agenciesState agencies like the Department of Ecology gain new rulemaking and enforcement authority, including issuing orders and collecting civil penalties.
Effective: July 1, 2028Fiscal impact: The bill creates civil penalties up to $5,000 for first offenses and $10,000 for repeat offenses, with all penalties deposited into the Model Toxics Control Operating Account. It also authorizes the Department of Ecology to adopt rules and issue corrective orders, with no explicit new appropriation needed.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 20, 2026 at 2:41 AM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (4)
  • By reducing microplastic discharge into waterways, the bill helps lower human exposure to microplastics—already found in 95% of U.S. tap water—potentially reducing long-term health risks (e.g., reproductive, liver, and respiratory harm) for all Washingtonians, especially vulnerable populations like children and pregnant people.

    HealthcarePeopleRef: Sec. 1(1)(a), Sec. 1(1)(c), Sec. 1(1)(d)
  • The requirement for 87%+ capture-rate filters on commercial/industrial machines (the largest source of microfiber pollution) will significantly reduce plastic contamination in Puget Sound, rivers, and drinking water sources, benefiting ecosystems, fisheries, and water quality for all residents.

    EnvironmentPeopleRef: Sec. 1(1)(e), Sec. 1(1)(f)
  • If residential filter requirements are adopted, first-time homebuyers and low-income households may benefit from future federal incentives (e.g., Inflation Reduction Act tax credits for energy-efficient appliances) that could partially offset added washer costs—though this is speculative and not guaranteed.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 3(2)(a)(ii)(B)
  • Civil penalties deposited into the Model Toxics Control Operating Account fund broader environmental cleanup and public health programs—e.g., PFAS remediation, hazardous waste cleanup—benefiting communities near contaminated sites, including many working-class and frontline neighborhoods.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 4(5)
Potential Concerns (4)
  • Commercial and industrial laundry operators (e.g., laundromats, hotels, hospitals, multifamily complexes) will face direct costs to purchase and install certified microfiber filtration systems on new machines (starting 2028) and existing machines (by 2034), with upfront equipment and installation costs estimated at $200–$800 per machine depending on scale and retrofit complexity.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 3(1), Sec. 3(3)
  • Ongoing maintenance burden increases for facility managers: filters must be checked regularly and lint disposed of as solid waste—tasks that may require staff time or third-party contractors, especially for large-scale operations like hospitals or multifamily housing.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 3(4)
  • If residential filter requirements are adopted post-2030, low- and middle-income households purchasing new washers may face $70–$200+ in added upfront costs—though likely offset over time by falling prices—while renters may not benefit directly since landlords control appliance purchases.

    HousingRef: Sec. 3(2)(a)(ii)(A) & (B)
  • Civil penalties up to $5,000 (first offense) and $10,000 (repeat) create enforcement risk for small operators lacking compliance resources; repeated violations could result in costly corrective orders and reputational harm, disproportionately affecting small laundromats or farms with on-site laundry.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 4(3)

Who Is Most Affected

Commercial and industrial laundry operatorsNegative Impact

Laundromats, hotels, hospitals, and multifamily housing operators will bear direct compliance costs for filter installation and maintenance; small operators may struggle with upfront expenses, though large chains may absorb costs more easily. Impact is negative in the short term but may improve as standards scale and prices fall.

Washing machine manufacturersMixed Impact

Manufacturers must equip new commercial/industrial washers with certified filters starting 2028, adding $200–$800 per unit. While this increases production costs, economies of scale and national market pressure (e.g., California, New York) may limit price pass-through and could even create new product lines. Impact is mixed but net negative for small manufacturers.

Residential consumersMixed Impact

Residential consumers may face $70–$200 higher upfront costs if filters become mandatory post-2030, but long-term health benefits (reduced microplastic ingestion) and potential federal补贴 could offset this. Renters gain little unless landlords voluntarily upgrade. Impact is modestly negative for low-income renters, neutral for middle-class owners.

State environmental agenciesPositive Impact

The Department of Ecology gains rulemaking and enforcement authority, with civil penalties funding toxics control programs. This expands regulatory capacity and revenue for public health initiatives—benefiting state agencies and communities reliant on clean water infrastructure.

Sponsors

Representative Pollet(Democrat)District 46Primary
Representative Berry(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Ryu(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Doglio(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Ramel(Democrat)District 40Secondary
Representative Stearns(Democrat)District 47Secondary
Representative Mena(Democrat)District 29Secondary
Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Callan(Democrat)District 5Secondary
Representative Scott(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Representative Cortes(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Zahn(Democrat)District 41Secondary
Representative Wylie(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Taylor(Democrat)District 30Secondary
Representative Duerr(Democrat)District 1Secondary
Representative Gregerson(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Thai(Democrat)District 41Secondary
Representative Farivar(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Macri(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Representative Fosse(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Donaghy(Democrat)District 44Secondary