Skip to main content

HB 1944

In Committee

House

Water-sewer district surplus

Concerning the sale of surplus property by water-sewer districts.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 10, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Local Govt
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill updates rules for how water-sewer districts in Washington can sell surplus property. It raises monetary thresholds for notice requirements, tightens appraisal rules for real estate sales, and adds flexibility to sell property at auction if it doesn’t sell at 90% of appraised value.

  • Raises the threshold for requiring public notice before selling personal property from $2,500 to $5,400.
  • Bars private sales of real property valued over $7,500 (up from $5,000) and requires public sale instead.
  • Requires real property appraisals or broker price opinions (from three licensed brokers or one certified appraiser) for sales where estimated value exceeds $5,000.
  • Sets a minimum sale price of 90% of appraised or estimated value for real property, unless no buyers are found after 120 days, after which the district may sell at public auction for the highest available price.
  • Requires detailed public notice (published twice weekly for two weeks) for real and personal property sales, including terms, conditions, and valuation basis.

Who is affected

  • Water-sewer districtsWater-sewer districts in Washington will gain clearer and updated rules for selling surplus property (both personal and real), including adjusted monetary thresholds and appraisal requirements.
  • Local governments and public utilitiesLocal governments and public utilities that may purchase surplus property from water-sewer districts will face updated procedures and valuation standards for such transactions.
  • Real estate professionalsReal estate brokers and appraisers may be asked to provide broker price opinions or appraisals for district property sales, especially for higher-value real estate.
  • ResidentsResidents and property owners in districts may benefit from more transparent and competitive sales of surplus land or equipment, potentially increasing public revenue.
Effective: July 28, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill does not specify a direct fiscal impact on the state budget, but may increase revenue for water-sewer districts from property sales due to updated thresholds and appraisal requirements.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 7:26 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (3)
  • Raising the personal property notice threshold from $2,500 to $5,400 reduces unnecessary administrative burden for districts selling low-value surplus items (e.g., old vehicles, tools, or equipment), freeing up staff time and reducing legal compliance risk for routine disposals.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 1 (RCW 57.08.015 as amended)
  • Prohibiting private sales of real property over $7,500 and requiring public auctions or competitive bidding increases transparency and reduces risk of undervaluation or sweetheart deals, helping ensure public assets are sold at fair market value and maximizing public revenue.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2 (RCW 57.08.016 as amended)
  • Requiring broker price opinions or appraisals for real property over $5,000 improves valuation accuracy and accountability, reducing the risk of selling public land for significantly less than market value—benefiting taxpayers by preserving public wealth.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 2 (RCW 57.08.016 as amended)
Potential Concerns (3)
  • The bill increases administrative complexity for water-sewer districts by requiring more detailed public notices and valuation documentation for property sales, potentially increasing staff time and legal risk exposure during routine surplus disposals—especially for smaller districts with limited administrative capacity.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 1 (RCW 57.08.015 as amended)
  • The requirement for three broker price opinions (or one certified appraiser) for real property over $5,000 may impose out-of-pocket costs on districts for valuations, which could be prohibitive for small or financially strained districts—particularly if they lack in-house appraisal expertise.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 2 (RCW 57.08.016 as amended)
  • By mandating a minimum 90% sale price for real property, the bill may delay or prevent the sale of surplus land that could be used for affordable housing or community facilities—especially if market conditions prevent reaching 90% of appraised value within 120 days, reducing local governments’ flexibility to repurpose land for public benefit.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 2(2) (RCW 57.08.016(2) as amended)

Who Is Most Affected

Water-sewer districtsMixed Impact

Water-sewer districts gain procedural clarity and updated thresholds, reducing unnecessary paperwork for low-value disposals but facing new valuation and notice costs for real estate. Smaller districts may struggle with appraisal expenses, while larger districts benefit from streamlined processes.

Local governments and public utilitiesMixed Impact

Local governments (e.g., cities, counties) that may purchase surplus property benefit from more transparent, competitive sales but may face higher acquisition costs due to appraisal and minimum-price requirements. Some may lose flexibility to quickly acquire land for housing or infrastructure.

Real estate professionalsPositive Impact

Real estate brokers and appraisers may see increased demand for broker price opinions and appraisals, especially for higher-value district sales. However, the requirement for three broker opinions may favor larger firms with more staff, potentially excluding solo practitioners.

ResidentsMixed Impact

Residents may benefit from fairer asset sales that maximize public revenue (e.g., for water system improvements), but could face delays or missed opportunities if surplus land isn’t sold quickly for affordable housing or community use.

Private real estate buyersNegative Impact

Potential buyers (e.g., developers, investors) may face less opportunity for off-market or discounted purchases of public land, increasing competition and fairness—but also potentially raising acquisition costs for private entities seeking public surplus property.

Sponsors

Representative Griffey(Republican)District 35Primary
Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Secondary