Skip to main content

HB 1792

In Committee

House

Nursing assistant regulation

Consolidating regulatory authority for nursing assistants.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 2, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H HC/Wellness
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill transfers regulatory oversight of certified and registered nursing assistants—including medication assistants—from the former nursing care quality assurance commission to the Washington state board of nursing, aligning their regulation with other nursing professions. It also expands pathways for related workers like home care aides and medical assistants to become certified nursing assistants and removes the current exemption allowing waiver of competency exams.

  • Consolidates regulatory authority for nursing assistants—including certified nursing assistants, registered nursing assistants, and medication assistants—under the Washington state board of nursing (previously regulated by the nursing care quality assurance commission).
  • Revises the composition of the board of nursing to include two certified nursing assistant members and one member who is a program director or educator in an approved nursing assistant training program.
  • Amends definitions and responsibilities to clarify that the board of nursing (not the department of health or former commission) is the licensing and disciplinary authority for nursing assistants and medication assistants.
  • Establishes a pathway for home care aides and medical assistants to become certified nursing assistants through alternative training and credentialing reciprocity, provided they meet additional training requirements.
  • Repeals the waiver of examination for initial applications (previously allowed under RCW 18.88A.100), requiring all applicants to pass a competency evaluation.
  • Updates the Uniform Disciplinary Act to explicitly include nursing assistants and medication assistants under the board of nursing’s disciplinary authority.

Who is affected

  • Certified nursing assistants and medication assistantsCertified nursing assistants (CNAs) and medication assistants will now be regulated by the state board of nursing instead of the former nursing care quality assurance commission, and must meet updated training, experience, and competency evaluation requirements under the same board overseeing other nursing professions.
  • Long-term care and home care nursing assistantsNursing assistants who work in long-term care or community-based settings may continue to perform delegated tasks, but must now be regulated by the board of nursing and meet updated training and supervision requirements.
  • Board of NursingThe board of nursing will gain direct disciplinary authority over nursing assistants and medication assistants, including the power to deny, issue, renew, or revoke credentials and impose discipline under the Uniform Disciplinary Act.
  • Nursing assistant training programsTraining programs for nursing assistants—including those at community colleges and vocational schools—must now be approved by the board of nursing rather than the former commission, and must align with federal standards for nurse aide training.
  • Home care aides and medical assistantsHome care aides and medical assistants who meet certain criteria may now use their credentials as a pathway to become certified nursing assistants through a reciprocity and alternative training program established by the board.
Effective: 2026-07-01Fiscal impact: The bill consolidates regulatory oversight under the board of nursing, which may reduce administrative duplication and improve efficiency. Fees collected from nursing assistants and medication assistants will continue to go into the health professions account, supporting regulatory operations. No significant new funding is required, but increased staffing or training support may be needed as the board assumes new responsibilities.Sunset: 2027-06-30
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 20, 2026 at 2:22 AM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Consolidating regulatory authority under the Board of Nursing—already responsible for licensing RNs, LPNs, and APRNs—creates a more unified and consistent disciplinary framework for all levels of nursing personnel, including CNAs and medication assistants. This alignment improves oversight consistency, reduces jurisdictional overlap, and strengthens accountability, especially for high-risk tasks like medication administration, thereby enhancing patient safety across settings.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 3 (definition of 'board' replaces 'commission'), Sec. 16 (UD Act applies to board as disciplinary authority)
  • The bill establishes clear pathways for home care aides and medical assistants to transition into certified nursing assistants via alternative training and credentialing reciprocity, reducing redundant training and accelerating career advancement for low-wage frontline workers. This supports workforce mobility and professional development, particularly for individuals already employed in long-term care who may lack time or resources to pursue full CNA programs.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 9 (RCW 18.88A.082), Sec. 11 (RCW 18.88A.087)
  • Adding two certified nursing assistants and one nursing assistant training educator to the Board of Nursing ensures that frontline workers and program instructors have formal representation in regulatory decision-making—addressing a long-standing gap in stakeholder voice. This inclusion improves the relevance and practicality of regulations, especially on issues like training standards, supervision models, and competency evaluation, making them more responsive to real-world care delivery.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 1 (board composition: 2 CNA members, 1 educator member)
  • The delayed implementation date (July 2026) allows time for training programs, employers, and the board to prepare for the transition, reducing disruption to current operations and giving stakeholders—especially small home care agencies and community colleges—time to align curricula and staffing models with new requirements.

    Business & EmploymentLean peopleRef: Sec. 21 (effective date: July 1, 2026)
  • The bill clarifies jurisdictional boundaries between the Department of Health (for home care aides) and the Board of Nursing (for nursing assistants), reducing regulatory ambiguity and potential gaps in oversight. This helps prevent confusion in disciplinary matters—especially for workers who hold both credentials—and ensures consistent application of the Uniform Disciplinary Act across relevant professions.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 18 (RCW 18.88B.060), Sec. 19 (UD Act includes home care aides under DOH, CNAs under Board)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Requiring all nursing assistant applicants—including those with prior training or experience—to pass a competency exam may create barriers to entry for experienced workers, especially those from low-income backgrounds or non-English speakers, potentially increasing staffing shortages in long-term care facilities at a time of acute workforce scarcity. The bill eliminates the waiver of examination that previously allowed experienced workers to bypass testing, which could delay or prevent certification for qualified individuals who struggle with standardized exams despite demonstrated competence.

    Public SafetyLean industryRef: Sec. 2 (repeal of RCW 18.88A.100)
  • While the bill adds two certified nursing assistant (CNA) members and one training program educator to the Board of Nursing, the board remains overwhelmingly dominated by RNs, APRNs, and LPNs (12 of 17 members), limiting the influence of frontline direct-care workers on regulatory decisions affecting their own scope of practice and working conditions. This structure may result in regulatory priorities that reflect professional self-interest over frontline worker input, especially on issues like delegation, supervision, and scope-of-practice boundaries.

    Local GovernmentIndustryRef: Sec. 1 & 2 (board composition changes: 2 CNAs, 1 educator)
  • The bill removes the Department of Health’s authority to hire administrative and investigative staff for nursing assistant regulation and transfers all disciplinary functions—including denial of certification, renewal, and discipline—to the Board of Nursing, which is not structured as an operational agency. This could lead to delays in complaint processing, inconsistent enforcement, and reduced oversight capacity, especially if the board lacks dedicated staff resources, potentially weakening consumer protection in long-term care settings.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 6 (repeal of departmental authority to hire staff; Sec. 7(17) transfer of disciplinary authority to board)
  • The bill creates a tiered regulatory system where CNAs working in nursing homes face stricter oversight (e.g., direct supervision, on-site RN assessment), while those in community-based or in-home settings operate under less stringent delegation rules—despite performing similar tasks—potentially increasing variability in care quality and safety across settings. This fragmentation may compromise patient safety, especially for vulnerable populations receiving care at home, where oversight is more diffuse and monitoring is limited.

    Public SafetyIndustryRef: Sec. 10 (RCW 18.88A.085), Sec. 14 (endorsement without competency), Sec. 17 (community-based delegation requirements)
  • The bill requires home- and community-based nursing assistants to complete separate training certifications (e.g., “basic core nurse delegation training” and “specialized diabetes training”) issued by DSHS—not the Board of Nursing—creating administrative duplication and confusion. Employers (e.g., home care agencies) must now navigate two sets of training standards for overlapping roles, increasing compliance costs and potentially discouraging hiring or retention of qualified staff, especially in rural or under-resourced areas.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 19 (RCW 18.88A.210), Sec. 17 (delegation training requirements)

Who Is Most Affected

Certified and registered nursing assistants (CNAs/RNAs) and medication assistantsMixed Impact

Frontline CNAs and medication assistants—especially those in nursing homes—will benefit from clearer career pathways and unified regulatory oversight, but may face increased barriers to entry due to mandatory competency exams and potential delays in disciplinary processes. The consolidation may improve consistency in discipline, but the lack of operational staffing in the board could weaken enforcement, indirectly affecting job security and fair treatment.

Home care aides and medical assistantsPositive Impact

Home care aides and medical assistants gain a formal, streamlined pathway to become CNAs, supporting upward mobility and retention in the workforce. However, they must complete additional training (24+ hours) and meet separate DSHS requirements, which may impose costs and time burdens—particularly for part-time or low-income workers—limiting access despite the policy intent.

Washington State Board of NursingMixed Impact

The Board of Nursing gains expanded authority and representation, improving its capacity to regulate all levels of nursing personnel consistently. However, the board lacks dedicated administrative or investigative staff, which may strain its ability to enforce standards, process complaints, and manage discipline—potentially undermining its effectiveness despite increased authority.

Long-term care facilities and home care agenciesMixed Impact

Long-term care facilities (especially nursing homes) benefit from clearer delegation rules and consistent oversight, but may face increased administrative burdens due to dual training requirements (Board vs. DSHS) and potential delays in disciplinary actions. The removal of the exam waiver could also exacerbate staffing shortages if experienced workers are unable to certify quickly.

Nursing assistant training programs (community colleges, vocational schools)Mixed Impact

Community colleges and vocational schools that offer CNA training programs gain formal approval authority from the Board of Nursing, aligning them with state licensing standards. However, they must now meet additional federal requirements and coordinate with the board on curriculum—potentially increasing administrative costs and requiring new staff or resources to maintain accreditation.

Sponsors

Representative Obras(Democrat)District 33Primary
Representative Stonier(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Wylie(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Secondary