Skip to main content

HB 1751

In Committee

House

Course materials sales tax

Establishing a sales and use tax exemption for required course materials at public institutions of higher education.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 29, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Finance

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill removes sales and use taxes on required course materials (like textbooks and digital resources) for students at Washington’s higher education institutions, provided they show proof of enrollment and buy from approved vendors. It also requires schools to inform students about the exemption and clarifies how the exemption applies to both physical and digital materials.

  • Exempts sales of required course materials (textbooks, digital resources, etc.) from Washington’s retail sales tax for students enrolled at higher education institutions, provided they show student ID, proof of enrollment, and buy from approved vendors.
  • Exempts the use of such materials from Washington’s use tax, even if purchased out-of-state or online.
  • Requires institutions of higher education to inform students about the tax exemption via their websites and course syllabi.
  • Defines 'required course materials' broadly to include both physical and digital instructional content required or recommended by instructors for credit-bearing courses.
  • Limits the exemption to purchases made through campus-affiliated bookstores, institution-designated online vendors, or other retailers that verify student status and course requirements.

Who is affected

  • StudentsStudents enrolled at public or private higher education institutions in Washington will no longer pay sales or use tax on required course materials (e.g., textbooks, digital resources) when purchasing them through approved channels, reducing their out-of-pocket costs.
  • Institutions of higher educationPublic and private colleges and universities in Washington must ensure students receive information about the tax exemption and verify student status and course enrollment at time of sale.
  • Retailers selling course materialsBookstores (including campus-affiliated and online vendors) and other retailers that sell required course materials must verify student status and enrollment to apply the exemption, potentially affecting their sales processes and systems.
  • State agenciesState agencies like the Higher Education Office and Department of Revenue will need to coordinate on implementation, guidance, and enforcement of the new exemption rules.
Effective: July 1, 2025Fiscal impact: The state will lose sales and use tax revenue from required course materials purchases by students. While the bill does not specify an exact amount, the legislature notes that students nationwide spend about $1.5 billion per semester on textbooks using financial aid, suggesting a meaningful reduction in state tax revenue in Washington.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 7:16 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (3)
  • Students—especially low- and middle-income students—will directly reduce out-of-pocket costs on required course materials, which are often purchased with financial aid that could otherwise cover housing, food, or transportation; this improves affordability and may reduce course withdrawal or non-completion due to cost.

    FinancialPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1); Sec. 3
  • Mandatory student outreach about the exemption improves transparency and may increase utilization, especially among first-generation and low-income students who may not otherwise know about the benefit.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 2(2)(a)-(b)
  • Broad definition of 'required course materials' to include digital resources helps ensure equitable access to modern learning tools, particularly for students with disabilities or those in remote/hybrid programs.

    EducationLean peopleRef: Sec. 2(3)(c)
Potential Concerns (1)
  • The state will lose meaningful sales and use tax revenue from required course materials purchases, estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually, which reduces public funding available for education, healthcare, transportation, and other core services that everyday Washingtonians rely on.

    FinancialPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(c); Sec. 3

Who Is Most Affected

Students (especially low- and middle-income, first-generation, community college)Positive Impact

Low- and middle-income students benefit most: they face acute cost pressure, often choose between textbooks and basic needs, and rely heavily on financial aid. The tax exemption directly increases their disposable income for other essentials. However, students at high-cost institutions or those purchasing outside approved vendors may not benefit fully.

Campus-affiliated and institution-designated retailersMixed Impact

Campus-affiliated bookstores and institution-designated vendors may see increased volume but lower per-unit margins due to tax-exempt pricing; they also face new compliance burdens (e.g., verifying enrollment and course requirements). Large national retailers not integrated with institutions may be excluded, reducing competition but also limiting student choice.

Institutions of higher education (public and private)Mixed Impact

Public institutions gain credibility for student affordability efforts, but must invest staff time and IT resources to implement website/syllabus disclosures and vendor verification systems. Private institutions face similar obligations but may lack infrastructure to verify student status at scale.

State agencies (DOR, Higher Education Office)Mixed Impact

State agencies (DOR, Higher Education Office) will need to issue guidance, train local auditors, and monitor compliance—costs that may strain already limited resources. However, the policy aligns with existing student-success goals and may reduce long-term remediation costs.

Digital course material providers and publishersMixed Impact

Digital content providers (e.g., publishers of e-books, platforms like Pearson, Macmillan) may benefit from increased adoption of digital materials—especially since the bill explicitly includes digital resources—but may also face pressure to lower prices to remain competitive under tax-exempt pricing. Large publishers with in-house platforms may gain advantage over smaller vendors.

Sponsors

Representative Timmons(Democrat)District 42Primary
Representative Rude(Republican)District 16Secondary
Representative Salahuddin(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Entenman(Democrat)District 47Secondary
Representative Nance(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative McEntire(Republican)District 19Secondary
Representative Scott(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Representative Thomas(Democrat)District 34Secondary
Representative Kloba(Democrat)District 1Secondary
Representative Reeves(Democrat)District 30Secondary
Representative Stonier(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Richards(Democrat)District 26Secondary
Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Schmidt(Republican)District 4Secondary
Representative Farivar(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Rule(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Representative Mena(Democrat)District 29Secondary
Representative Simmons(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Zahn(Democrat)District 41Secondary
Representative Fosse(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Shavers(Democrat)District 10Secondary
Representative Obras(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Jacobsen(Republican)District 25Secondary
Representative Paul(Democrat)District 10Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Thai(Democrat)District 41Secondary
Representative Hill(Democrat)District 3Secondary
Representative Pollet(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Ramel(Democrat)District 40Secondary