Skip to main content

HB 1558

In Committee

House

Broadcasters

Concerning broadcasters.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 22, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Finance
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesBalancedCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill creates a new 0.484 percent business and occupation (B&O) tax on radio and television broadcasters in Washington, but allows them to exclude out-of-state advertising revenue and/or national/regional advertising revenue using either a standard deduction or itemized calculation. It formally separates broadcasting as a distinct taxable activity under state tax law.

  • Imposes a 0.484 percent B&O tax on gross income from radio and television broadcasting in Washington.
  • Allows broadcasters to exclude revenues from national, network, and regional advertising — either via a standard deduction (to be published by the Department of Revenue by September 30, 2025, and every five years after) or by itemizing and excluding out-of-state audience revenue based on signal contours.
  • Defines 'radio and television broadcasting' broadly to include delivery of audio, video, and written content by FCC-licensed stations, regardless of delivery method (e.g., wire, satellite, internet).
  • Amends existing B&O tax law (RCW 82.04.280) to formally separate broadcasting as its own taxable activity, removing it from a broader category and adding specific exclusions for national/regional advertising.
  • Clarifies that the new tax does not apply to certain existing B&O tax rules (RCW 82.32.805 and 82.32.808).

Who is affected

  • Radio and television broadcastersRadio and television stations operating in Washington that generate advertising revenue will be subject to a new business and occupation (B&O) tax on their in-state advertising revenue, but can exclude out-of-state advertising revenue and/or apply a standard or itemized deduction for national/regional advertising.
  • Washington Department of RevenueThe Washington Department of Revenue will be responsible for publishing a standard deduction amount for national/regional advertising revenue, updated every five years starting September 30, 2025.
  • Businesses with broadcasting operationsBusinesses that previously reported broadcasting as part of a broader B&O tax category may need to reclassify their broadcasting operations and adjust tax calculations accordingly.
Effective: March 30, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill creates a new B&O tax category for broadcasting with a tax rate of 0.484 percent on in-state gross income from broadcasting, after allowable exclusions. Fiscal impact is expected to be modest and dependent on how many broadcasters claim the standard deduction versus itemizing, and how much out-of-state advertising revenue they report.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 7:04 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (5)
  • By allowing exclusion of out-of-state advertising revenue, the bill ensures that only in-state economic activity is taxed—protecting local broadcasters from being taxed on revenue generated outside Washington, aligning with principles of fair apportionment and preventing double taxation.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 1 & Sec. 2(1)(f)(ii)
  • The bill formalizes broadcasting as a distinct B&O tax category, improving clarity and administrative consistency for the Department of Revenue and local governments that rely on B&O tax revenue—reducing disputes and compliance errors.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(f)(i)
  • The itemized exclusion option for out-of-state audience revenue provides flexibility for stations with significant digital or satellite distribution, allowing them to accurately reflect their actual in-state economic footprint—supporting fair taxation in an evolving media landscape.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(f)(ii)
  • By explicitly exempting the new broadcasting tax from existing B&O tax reporting rules (RCW 82.32.805 and 82.32.808), the bill avoids unintended conflicts with prior law, streamlining compliance for broadcasters and reducing audit risk.

    Local GovernmentLean peopleRef: Sec. 3
  • The standard deduction mechanism simplifies tax compliance for small and mid-sized broadcasters who lack resources for detailed revenue apportionment—reducing administrative burden and encouraging voluntary compliance.

    Business & EmploymentLean peopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(f)(i)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The bill imposes a new 0.484% B&O tax on in-state broadcasting revenue, which may reduce profitability for local stations—particularly small, independently owned outlets—potentially leading to staff cuts, reduced local programming, or consolidation into larger media groups. While national/regional ad revenue can be excluded, many local stations rely heavily on in-state advertising, making them disproportionately affected.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 1 & Sec. 2(1)(f)(ii)
  • The standard deduction and itemized exclusion mechanisms favor larger broadcasters with complex revenue structures and legal/financial staff to navigate itemization, while smaller stations may lack resources to maximize exclusions—effectively giving a competitive advantage to large media conglomerates over local independent operators.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 2(1)(f)(i) & (ii)
  • Reduced advertising revenue may lead to cuts in emergency alert system participation, public service announcements, or local weather coverage—especially for stations operating on thin margins—potentially weakening public safety communication infrastructure during disasters.

    Public SafetyIndustryRef: Sec. 1 & Sec. 2(1)(f)(ii)
  • The signal-contour-based method for calculating out-of-state audience may be technically complex and inconsistent across platforms (e.g., AM vs. FM vs. digital streaming), creating administrative burden and potential for under- or over-exclusion—especially for stations transitioning to hybrid broadcast-digital models.

    Business & EmploymentLean industryRef: Sec. 2(1)(f)(ii)
  • The tax applies to gross income from broadcasting *after* exclusions, but the standard deduction is based on national averages from the Census Bureau’s Economic Census—which may not reflect Washington-specific advertising patterns—potentially over- or under-estimating national/regional ad revenue for local stations, leading to unfair tax liability.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 1 & Sec. 2(1)(f)(i)

Who Is Most Affected

Small, independent local broadcastersNegative Impact

Small, locally owned radio and TV stations—especially those without network affiliations—will face the highest relative tax burden, as they rely more on in-state advertising and lack the resources to maximize exclusions. This may accelerate consolidation or closures, reducing local news and public service content.

Large media conglomeratesPositive Impact

Large media conglomerates with national/regional ad contracts and sophisticated finance teams can maximize exclusions and benefit from economies of scale, potentially increasing their market share as smaller competitors struggle. The tax may act as a barrier to entry for new local entrants.

Local governments (e.g., city/county finance offices)Mixed Impact

Local governments that collect B&O taxes may see modest revenue increases, but could also face long-term declines if local stations downsize or shut down. The tax’s design may stabilize revenue by formalizing the category, but sustainability depends on industry health.

General public (especially rural and underserved communities)Mixed Impact

State residents may lose access to local news and emergency information if stations cut staff or programming. However, the tax ensures broadcasters contribute to state revenue in proportion to their in-state economic activity, supporting public services.

Washington Department of RevenuePositive Impact

The Department of Revenue gains a clearer tax base and rulemaking authority (e.g., standard deduction updates), improving administrative efficiency. However, it must invest in monitoring signal contours and verifying itemized claims, adding compliance costs.

Sponsors

Representative Santos(Democrat)District 37Primary
Representative Orcutt(Republican)District 20Secondary