Skip to main content

SHB 1530

In Committee

House

Reg. businesses/card fees

Modernizing payment systems by expanding consumer-friendly transaction options for registered tow truck operators and regulated businesses.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 13, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H ConsPro&Bus
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill lets regulated businesses — especially registered tow truck operators — charge a transparent fee up to 3% to cover credit card processing costs, as long as they also offer a no-cost payment option. It aims to fix an inequity where unregulated businesses can pass on these fees but regulated ones cannot, helping small businesses stay financially viable while protecting consumer choice.

  • Allows businesses whose fees are regulated by the state (e.g., tow truck operators) to charge a credit card transaction fee of up to 3% of the payment amount.
  • Requires businesses to offer a no-cost payment option (e.g., cash, check, ACH) at all times — no consumer can be forced to pay a card fee.
  • Mandates that the availability of the no-cost option be disclosed to consumers at the same time and in the same manner as credit card information is collected.
  • Defines a 'credit card payment' as any card transaction that incurs an interchange fee (e.g., credit, debit, or prepaid cards), regardless of card type.
  • Aligns Washington’s treatment of regulated businesses with current state practices — the state already charges similar fees for card payments on things like driver’s licenses and court fines.

Who is affected

  • Registered tow truck operatorsTow truck operators who are required to tow vehicles for public agencies but often don’t get paid for those tows; this bill lets them recover credit card processing fees to help offset financial losses.
  • Small regulated businessesSmall businesses in Washington that are subject to state regulation and currently cannot pass on credit card processing fees — this bill allows them to add a transparent fee up to 3% to help cover those costs.
  • ConsumersConsumers who use credit or debit cards to pay for services from regulated businesses — they gain access to a no-cost payment option and must be clearly informed of any optional fee before payment is processed.
  • State agenciesState agencies (like the Department of Licensing) that already charge transaction fees for card payments — this bill aligns regulated businesses with existing state practices.
Effective: July 28, 2025Fiscal impact: No direct fiscal impact on state or local government budgets; the bill allows regulated businesses to recover costs they currently absorb, which may improve their financial stability but does not create new state expenses or revenue.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 20, 2026 at 2:41 AM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Allows small, regulated tow operators—who often perform unreimbursed public-safety tows—to recover credit card processing costs, directly improving their financial viability and helping prevent business closures that reduce service availability in rural or underserved areas.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(a)
  • Mandating a no-cost payment option protects low-income consumers and those without credit cards (e.g., immigrants, seniors, low-wage workers) from being forced into expensive payment methods, promoting equitable access to essential services.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(b)
  • By aligning with state practice (e.g., DOL’s card fees), the bill reduces regulatory inconsistency and creates predictability for businesses operating across sectors—especially helpful for small firms that serve both public agencies and private customers.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 2(3)
  • Improving the financial stability of tow operators—many of whom provide emergency roadside and law enforcement support—helps ensure consistent service availability during critical incidents, especially in rural counties where private providers are scarce.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 1(4)
  • Directly addresses a documented inequity: unregulated businesses can pass on processing fees, but regulated ones (like tow operators) cannot—this bill corrects that imbalance, disproportionately helping small, independent operators who lack pricing power and margins.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 1(2)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The 3% fee cap may be insufficient to fully offset credit card processing costs for many small tow operators, especially those with high transaction volumes or high-cost merchant processors, potentially leaving them still financially strained.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 2(2)
  • Mandating simultaneous disclosure of the no-cost option and credit card collection may create operational friction—e.g., requiring staff to interrupt card entry to re-prompt for alternative payment—increasing transaction time and reducing efficiency at small businesses with limited staff.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 2(1)(b)
  • Including debit and prepaid cards in the definition of 'credit card payment' may inadvertently apply the 3% fee to transactions where interchange fees are often below 1% (e.g., debit cards), leading some businesses to overcharge consumers or avoid offering the fee altogether due to confusion.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 2(3)
  • The requirement to always offer a no-cost option may disproportionately burden small tow operators who serve customers in emergency roadside situations—where time-sensitive service and limited staffing make offering multiple payment modalities logistically difficult or unsafe.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 2(1)(a)
  • While the bill claims no fiscal impact on state/local budgets, if more tow operators remain solvent due to fee recovery, this could reduce reliance on public assistance programs (e.g., SNAP, TANF) for owner-operator families—but this is speculative and not quantified in the bill.

    Local GovernmentRef: Fiscal Impact section

Who Is Most Affected

Registered tow truck operatorsPositive Impact

Registered tow operators—especially sole proprietors and small firms—are the primary beneficiaries. They face high unreimbursed public-tow costs and currently absorb card processing fees, reducing margins. This bill allows cost recovery, improving financial sustainability and reducing risk of business closure.

Consumers (especially low-income, elderly, or unbanked)Mixed Impact

Low-income and unbanked consumers benefit from guaranteed no-cost payment options, protecting them from hidden fees and ensuring access to essential services. However, they gain no direct financial benefit if fees are passed on—only protection from being excluded.

State agenciesMixed Impact

State agencies (e.g., DOL, courts) already charge card fees and will see alignment with private-sector practice, reducing perceived regulatory inconsistency—but they face no new costs or responsibilities.

Payment processors and financial service providersMixed Impact

Merchants’ processors and payment gateways may see modest volume increases from added card transactions, but the 3% cap and disclosure rules reduce their ability to upsell premium processing—net effect is neutral to slightly negative.

Local governmentsPositive Impact

Local governments (e.g., cities, counties) that contract with tow operators may benefit from more stable service providers, reducing emergency response gaps—but they gain no direct cost savings, as the bill does not affect reimbursement rates.