Skip to main content

HB 1454

In Committee

House

Drug task force funding

Funding multijurisdictional drug task forces.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 20, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Approps

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill provides $7 million in state funding to support multijurisdictional drug task forces across Washington by creating a grant program administered by the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs. It requires participating agencies to follow specific reporting and peer review standards tied to a federal grant program and allows the administrator to keep up to 5% for program costs.

  • Appropriates $7,000,000 from the state general fund to the Criminal Justice Training Commission for the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) to administer a grant program for multijurisdictional drug task forces.
  • Requires WASPC to ensure grant recipients follow the same peer review and reporting requirements that applied to Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) recipients as of January 1, 2023.
  • Allows WASPC to retain up to 5% of the appropriation ($350,000) for administrative costs of running the grant program.
  • Funds are available for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, and may be spent as needed during that period.

Who is affected

  • Local and regional law enforcement agenciesLaw enforcement agencies that participate in drug task forces (e.g., city police departments, county sheriff’s offices, or regional task forces) may receive grant funding to support drug-related investigations and enforcement activities, provided they meet reporting and peer review requirements.
  • Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC)The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) will administer the grant program, including reviewing applications, ensuring compliance with reporting rules, and retaining up to 5% of funds for program management.
  • General publicState residents may benefit from increased coordination and capacity among drug task forces, potentially leading to more effective enforcement and reduced drug-related crime.
Effective: July 1, 2025Fiscal impact: Appropriates $7,000,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, to support drug task force grants. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs may use up to 5% ($350,000) for program administration.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 6:58 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (2)
  • The $7 million grant program enhances coordination and capacity among regional drug task forces, enabling more effective interagency investigations into drug trafficking networks—potentially reducing illicit drug availability and related violent crime in communities that lack resources for standalone task forces.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 1 ($7M appropriation for multijurisdictional drug task forces)
  • By requiring adherence to Byrne JAG peer review and reporting standards, the bill promotes accountability and standardization across participating agencies, improving transparency and reducing the risk of mismanagement or abuse of grant funds by local law enforcement.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 1 (grant program administered by WASPC with peer review requirements)
Potential Concerns (3)
  • The bill allocates $7 million to fund drug task forces, but does not require evidence-based strategies, outcome metrics, or independent evaluation—raising concerns that increased enforcement may not reduce drug-related harms and could instead escalate arrests for low-level offenses without improving public safety outcomes.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 1 (funding appropriation and reporting requirements)
  • While only 5% ($350,000) is retained for administration, this reduces the amount available for direct task force operations—potentially limiting the scale or geographic reach of enforcement, especially in rural or under-resourced jurisdictions that rely on multijurisdictional support.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 1 (5% administrative retention by WASPC)
  • The bill mandates compliance with Byrne JAG reporting requirements as of 2023, which include data collection on arrests, seizures, and demographics—but without privacy safeguards or limits on how data may be used, increasing the risk of over-policing and racial profiling in drug enforcement activities.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 1 (peer review/reporting tied to 2023 Byrne JAG standards)

Who Is Most Affected

Local and regional law enforcement agenciesPositive Impact

Local and regional law enforcement agencies benefit positively, as the grant provides critical funding to support multi-jurisdictional drug investigations—especially helpful for smaller agencies that lack resources to run independent task forces.

Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC)Mixed Impact

WASPC benefits operationally and financially through a $350,000 administrative budget, but faces increased accountability obligations tied to Byrne JAG reporting, which may strain staff resources without additional funding.

General publicMixed Impact

General public may benefit from reduced drug trafficking and related crime, but could also face increased policing in marginalized neighborhoods if enforcement priorities are not aligned with community health approaches.

People with substance use disordersNegative Impact

People struggling with substance use disorders may be negatively impacted if the bill prioritizes arrest and seizure over treatment diversion, especially since the bill contains no funding for health-based interventions.

Rural and small municipal law enforcement agenciesPositive Impact

Rural counties and smaller municipal agencies benefit more than large urban departments, as the grant supports regional collaboration—helping jurisdictions that otherwise lack staffing or equipment for complex drug investigations.

Sponsors

Representative Griffey(Republican)District 35Primary
Representative Couture(Republican)District 35Secondary
Representative Burnett(Republican)District 12Secondary
Representative Graham(Republican)District 6Secondary
Representative Valdez(Republican)District 26Secondary
Representative Abell(Republican)District 7Secondary
Representative Davis(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Klicker(Republican)District 16Secondary
Representative Eslick(Republican)District 39Secondary