Skip to main content

HB 1433

In Committee

House

Psychedelic substances

Concerning access to psychedelic substances.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 19, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H HC/Wellness
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill creates a regulated legal framework in Washington State for adults 21 and older to access psychedelic substances like psilocybin in supervised, therapeutic settings. It establishes licensing for facilitators, service centers, manufacturers, and labs, and creates two new state accounts to fund program operations through fees. The bill emphasizes client safety, confidentiality, equity, and research opportunities.

  • Establishes a regulated system allowing adults 21 and older to access psychedelic substances like psilocybin through licensed facilitators, clinical facilitators, and service centers.
  • Creates two new licensing frameworks: one under the Department of Health for facilitators and service centers, and one under the Liquor and Cannabis Board for manufacturers and laboratories.
  • Requires the Department of Health to develop rules for administration sessions, including preparation, administration, and integration sessions, and to ensure client safety, confidentiality, and equity.
  • Provides legal protections for health professionals who advise or counsel clients about psychedelic use, shielding them from adverse licensing actions under state law.
  • Establishes strict confidentiality rules for client information, limiting disclosure to third parties unless authorized by the client or required by law.
  • Mandates equity considerations in program design, including cost reduction strategies and prioritization of access for historically disadvantaged communities.

Who is affected

  • Adult clients seeking psychedelic servicesAdults aged 21 and older who wish to access psychedelic substances like psilocybin in a regulated, supervised setting for therapeutic or personal growth purposes.
  • Health professionals and facilitatorsHealth professionals—including therapists, counselors, nurses, and others—who want to provide psychedelic-assisted services and need legal protection and training to do so without risk of professional discipline under current federal drug laws.
  • Licensing applicants and business operatorsService center operators, manufacturers, and laboratories that will be licensed to provide, produce, test, and distribute psychedelic substances under state oversight.
  • Equity-focused communitiesHistorically disadvantaged, economically disadvantaged, justice-involved, and disproportionately impacted communities, who are prioritized for equitable access and reduced barriers to services.
  • Researchers and academic institutionsResearch institutions and scientists, who gain new opportunities to conduct clinical trials and analyze anonymized data on psychedelic use in Washington.
Effective: September 1, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill creates two new state accounts—the psychedelic substance facilitation control and regulation account and the psychedelic substance manufacture and testing control and regulation account—to be funded by license and permit fees. These fees are intended to cover the full cost of administering the program. No general fund appropriation is required.Sunset: July 1, 2030
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 6:57 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • The bill mandates cost-reduction strategies and prioritization of access for historically disadvantaged communities, aiming to prevent the program from replicating the exclusivity and high costs seen in Oregon and Colorado’s psychedelic programs.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(f)
  • The bill explicitly protects clients from arrest, prosecution, or loss of parental rights solely for lawful psychedelic use under the program, providing legal certainty and reducing stigma-based discrimination.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 56(2)
  • The bill shields health professionals from adverse licensing actions for advising or counseling clients about psychedelic use, removing a major barrier to professional participation and expanding access to informed care.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 56(1)
  • The bill establishes a client bill of rights guaranteeing dignity, confidentiality, informed consent, and protection from abuse, enhancing safety and trust in the program.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 54
  • The bill prohibits employers from discriminating against employees for lawful psychedelic use outside work absent visible impairment, expanding workplace protections and reducing employment barriers for participants.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 57
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The bill preempts local governments from banning psychedelic service centers except in residentially zoned areas and prohibits local taxes/fees on the industry, limiting local control over land use and revenue generation.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 50(3)
  • The bill prohibits local governments from imposing proximity restrictions (e.g., buffer zones from schools), removing local authority to tailor land-use policies to community needs and safety concerns.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 50(4)
  • The bill allows local governments to set reasonable operating hours but prohibits them from requiring clients to leave during active psychedelic effects, potentially increasing public nuisance risks in neighborhoods near service centers.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 50(2)(c)
  • The bill permits local governments to impose reasonable public access restrictions, but the lack of statutory definition creates uncertainty and potential for inconsistent local enforcement.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 50(2)(d)
  • The bill declares state law paramount and supersedes inconsistent local ordinances, reducing local autonomy and potentially overriding community values or concerns about psychedelic service proliferation.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 48

Who Is Most Affected

Adult clients seeking psychedelic servicesMixed Impact

Adult clients seeking therapeutic or personal growth benefits from supervised psychedelic services stand to gain significantly, especially those from historically disadvantaged communities prioritized for equitable access. However, low-income clients may still face barriers due to high service costs not covered by insurance.

Health professionals and facilitatorsPositive Impact

Health professionals gain legal protection and expanded scope to offer psychedelic-assisted care without fear of professional discipline, but must navigate new training, liability, and ethical responsibilities.

Licensing applicants and business operatorsMixed Impact

Business operators (service centers, manufacturers, labs) gain new licensing pathways and market opportunities, but must comply with strict regulatory and security requirements that may favor well-capitalized operators.

Equity-focused communitiesMixed Impact

Equity-focused communities are prioritized in program design, but actual access depends on whether cost-reduction strategies and outreach succeed in overcoming structural barriers.

Researchers and academic institutionsPositive Impact

Researchers gain new opportunities for clinical trials and anonymized data analysis, but data access is limited by strict confidentiality rules and federal restrictions.

Sponsors

Representative Macri(Democrat)District 43Primary
Representative Couture(Republican)District 35Secondary
Representative Ramel(Democrat)District 40Secondary
Representative Griffey(Republican)District 35Secondary
Representative Lekanoff(Democrat)District 40Secondary
Representative Ormsby(Democrat)District 3Secondary
Representative Nance(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Walen(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Cortes(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Fosse(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Doglio(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Reeves(Democrat)District 30Secondary
Representative Goodman(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Representative McEntire(Republican)District 19Secondary
Representative Bernbaum(Democrat)District 24Secondary
Representative Waters(Republican)District 17Secondary
Representative Street(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Representative Pollet(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Gregerson(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Rude(Republican)District 16Secondary
Representative Simmons(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Berry(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Fitzgibbon(Democrat)District 34Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Peterson(Democrat)District 21Secondary
Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Farivar(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Tharinger(Democrat)District 24Secondary
Representative Hill(Democrat)District 3Secondary