Skip to main content

HB 1404

In Committee

House

Free school meals

Increasing student access to free meals served at public schools.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 19, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Approps
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill makes school breakfast and lunch free for all public school students in Washington, starting in the 2026-27 school year, regardless of income or prior eligibility. It expands access by requiring universal meal service, streamlining eligibility through a new electronic system, and increasing state reimbursement. It also updates bonus eligibility for high-poverty schools and requires high-poverty schools to join the federal Community Eligibility Provision.

  • Starting in the 2026-27 school year, all public schools must provide breakfast and lunch each school day to any student who requests it—no charge and no requirement to submit a free/reduced-price meal application.
  • School districts must continue collecting meal eligibility applications and running direct certification (automatically enrolling students based on participation in other assistance programs), to maximize federal funding.
  • The state will reimburse districts for meal costs not covered by federal programs, at the difference between the federal free and paid meal rates plus $0.05 per meal (or more if authorized in the budget).
  • Schools with at least 40% 'identified students' (students directly certified or categorically eligible) must join the federal Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) for a four-year cycle, unless they already provide universal free meals through another arrangement.
  • A new statewide electronic system will be created to securely collect household income information and streamline eligibility for free meals—without requiring paper applications—while ensuring data privacy and accessibility in multiple languages.
  • Bonuses for National Board Certified Teachers in high-poverty schools are expanded: eligibility now includes schools that provide universal free meals, even if they are not currently classified as 'high poverty' under prior rules.

Who is affected

  • Public school studentsAll public school students in Washington will be able to receive breakfast and lunch at school each day without charge, regardless of their family's income or prior eligibility for free/reduced-price meals.
  • Public school districtsSchool districts must provide meals to all requesting students starting in the 2026-27 school year, and may be reimbursed by the state for costs not covered by federal programs.
  • Families and caregivers of studentsFamilies of students who previously relied on free/reduced-price meal applications may no longer need to apply, as schools will offer meals to all students automatically.
  • Certificated instructional staffTeachers and other instructional staff in high-poverty schools (or schools offering universal free meals) may be eligible for additional bonuses under updated eligibility rules.
  • Office of the Superintendent of Public InstructionThe Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction must implement a new statewide electronic system to collect household income data and streamline meal eligibility, and will manage state reimbursement for meal costs.
Effective: September 1, 2026Fiscal impact: The state will reimburse school districts for the difference between federal free meal rates and paid meal rates, plus $0.05 per meal, for meals provided under the new universal program. Additional funding is needed for the new statewide electronic income data system and bonuses for instructional staff in high-poverty schools. The bill includes a 'sunset' provision: if specific funding is not appropriated by June 30, 2025, the bill becomes null and void.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 6:55 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Universal free school meals eliminate stigma, reduce administrative burden on families, and ensure all students—regardless of income—receive nutritious breakfast and lunch, directly improving student well-being and classroom readiness.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 1, findings; Sec. 3(1)(a), as amended
  • State reimbursement for meal costs not covered by federal programs (difference between free and paid rates + $0.05) reduces financial strain on school districts, especially those with lower federal reimbursement rates or higher meal participation.

    FinancialPeopleRef: Sec. 3(2)
  • Creation of a secure, multilingual electronic income data system streamlines eligibility for free meals and other support programs—reducing paperwork, improving accuracy, and increasing take-up of benefits for eligible families.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 7(1)(b) and (c), as amended
  • Mandates high-poverty schools (≥40% identified students) to join the federal Community Eligibility Provision, simplifying meal service and increasing federal reimbursement rates for schools with high need.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 8(1)(a), as amended
  • Requires districts to continue direct certification and application collection to maximize federal funding, preserving critical federal reimbursements that offset state costs and support low-income students.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 3(4)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Expands eligibility for high-poverty learning assistance funding to schools that provide universal free meals—even if they no longer meet the traditional 50% free/reduced-price meal threshold—helping sustain academic support in schools transitioning to universal meals.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 2, subsection (10)(a)(iii) and (iv), as amended by Sec. 2 of HB 1404
  • Maintains and expands funding for learning assistance programs based on historical free/reduced-price meal eligibility, preserving critical academic support for low-income students during the transition to universal meals.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 2, subsection (10)(a)(i), as amended by Sec. 2 of HB 1404
  • Expands National Board Certified Teacher bonuses to schools that provide universal free meals—even if they fall below the prior 70% free/reduced-price threshold—helping retain high-quality teachers in high-poverty schools.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 9, subsection (2)(c), as added by Sec. 9 of HB 1404
  • Preserves and extends the use of 2019–2022 historical free/reduced-price meal data to determine learning assistance funding through 2029–30, preventing abrupt funding cliffs as schools transition to universal meals.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 2, subsection (10)(a)(i), as amended by Sec. 2 of HB 1404
  • Ensures schools that previously qualified as 'high poverty' and now provide universal free meals retain eligibility for additional high-poverty learning assistance funding, supporting continuity of academic interventions.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 2, subsection (10)(a)(ii), as amended by Sec. 2 of HB 1404

Who Is Most Affected

Public school studentsPositive Impact

All public school students benefit from guaranteed access to breakfast and lunch without stigma or application barriers. Students from low-income households gain the most, as they no longer face barriers to participation or fear of debt.

Families and caregivers of studentsPositive Impact

Families gain from reduced household financial burden (no meal fees), less administrative paperwork, and peace of mind that children are fed. Low- and moderate-income families benefit most, as they previously relied on free/reduced-price applications and may have faced meal debt.

Public school districtsMixed Impact

School districts face new operational costs but receive state reimbursement for unfunded meal costs. High-poverty districts benefit most, as they gain access to higher federal reimbursement rates via CEP and avoid meal debt collection burdens.

Certificated instructional staffPositive Impact

Teachers in high-poverty schools (or schools offering universal meals) gain eligibility for $5,000 bonuses if they hold National Board Certification—helping retain experienced educators in high-need schools.

Office of the Superintendent of Public InstructionMixed Impact

OSPI gains new responsibilities (electronic system, reimbursement administration, CEP oversight) but also strengthens its capacity to streamline eligibility and support equity. The agency's role expands, but funding is contingent on legislative appropriation.

Sponsors

Representative Berg(Democrat)District 44Primary
Representative Rude(Republican)District 16Secondary
Representative Leavitt(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Representative Stonier(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Simmons(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Davis(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Berry(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Mena(Democrat)District 29Secondary
Representative Stearns(Democrat)District 47Secondary
Representative Thai(Democrat)District 41Secondary
Representative Walen(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Rule(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Representative Ryu(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Parshley(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Peterson(Democrat)District 21Secondary
Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Paul(Democrat)District 10Secondary
Representative Gregerson(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Senator Alvarado(Democrat)District 34Secondary
Representative Reeves(Democrat)District 30Secondary
Representative Goodman(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Representative Cortes(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Obras(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Fey(Democrat)District 27Secondary
Representative Salahuddin(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Springer(Democrat)District 45Secondary
Representative Bernbaum(Democrat)District 24Secondary
Representative Fosse(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Pollet(Democrat)District 46Secondary
Representative Street(Democrat)District 37Secondary
Representative Hill(Democrat)District 3Secondary
Representative Macri(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Representative Timmons(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Representative Scott(Democrat)District 43Secondary