Skip to main content
← Back to bills

HB 1365

In Committee

House

Mobile home rental assist.

Providing rental assistance to manufactured/mobile home park tenants.

  1. Introduced (completed)
  2. 2
    Committee (current stage)
  3. 3
    Floor Vote (not started)
  4. 4
    Opposite Chamber (not started)
  5. 5
    Governor (not started)
  6. 6
    Signed (not started)

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 16, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Housing

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill creates a new rental assistance program to help low-income, older mobile home park tenants afford rising lot rent. It provides up to $200 per month or half the rent, whichever is less, and requires applicants to be over age 55, low-income, and facing rent hikes above inflation. Funding is set at $2 million for 2026, but the program only takes effect if that money is specifically appropriated by June 30, 2025.

  • Creates a new manufactured/mobile home rental assistance program administered by the Department of Commerce to help low-income tenants pay lot rent.
  • Provides monthly rental assistance of up to $200 or 50% of monthly lot rent, whichever is less.
  • Eligibility requires applicants to be: (1) low-income (income ≤ 80% of area median), (2) age 55 or older, and (3) facing a rent increase that outpaces inflation (as measured by the federal implicit price deflator).
  • Assistance lasts for one year per approval, with annual reapplication required; tenants must report changes in income or rent that affect eligibility.
  • Establishes an Office of Mobile/Manufactured Home Relocation and Rental Assistance within the Department of Commerce to administer both relocation and new rental assistance programs.
  • Prohibits use of existing park relocation fund money for this new rental assistance program — funding must come from new general fund appropriations.

Who is affected

  • Low-income mobile home park tenants aged 55+ — Low-income mobile home park tenants aged 55 or older who have experienced rent increases that outpace inflation may receive monthly rental assistance to help pay for their lot rent.
  • Mobile home park owners — Mobile home park owners may see reduced rent collection from affected tenants, but the program is designed to help tenants stay in place rather than force relocation.
  • State government agencies — State agencies (especially the Department of Commerce) will be responsible for administering the new rental assistance program, including processing applications and verifying eligibility.
  • Tenant and resident advocacy organizations — Nonprofit tenant and resident organizations may receive technical assistance from the new office created under the bill to help tenants apply for and manage assistance.
Effective: July 1, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill appropriates $2,000,000 from the state general fund for the 2026 fiscal year to fund the new rental assistance program. Funding is contingent on inclusion in the 2025 omnibus appropriations act; if not provided by June 30, 2025, the program is null and void.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026, 6:52 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Direct monthly rental assistance up to $200 or 50% of rent significantly reduces housing cost burden for low-income seniors in mobile home parks, helping prevent displacement and homelessness — a high-risk group with limited housing options.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 1; Sec. 2(2); Sec. 3(1)(a)-(c)
  • Creation of a dedicated office within Commerce to administer both relocation and rental assistance improves program coherence and reduces fragmentation — especially valuable for a historically underserved population with complex housing needs.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 5(3); Sec. 1
  • Annual reapplication with income/rent reporting ensures program remains targeted and responsive to changing circumstances — helps prevent over-enrollment and maintains fairness while allowing flexibility for temporary rent spikes.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 3(2); Sec. 3(3)
  • Technical assistance to tenant organizations strengthens community capacity to advocate for themselves and navigate housing systems — indirectly supports long-term stability and reduces reliance on emergency services.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 5(1)
  • Using the existing 80% AMI definition aligns the program with other state housing assistance programs — promotes consistency in eligibility and reduces confusion for applicants who may qualify for multiple benefits.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 4(6); Sec. 3(1)(a)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The $200/month cap and 50% limit means many eligible tenants still face unaffordable rent increases — especially in high-cost areas like King or Snohomish counties where average lot rents exceed $500/month — limiting the program’s real-world impact despite good design.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 2(2); Sec. 3(1)(c)
  • The $2 million appropriation is a small fraction of need: with ~20,000 mobile home park units in WA and ~12,000 likely eligible (based on 80% AMI and age 55+), funding supports only ~1,000 households at full benefit — leaving most low-income seniors without meaningful help.

    FinancialLean peopleRef: Sec. 6; Sec. 7
  • Annual reapplication and income/rent change reporting create administrative burdens and risk coverage gaps — tenants may lose benefits mid-year due to delayed reporting or administrative delays, undermining housing stability.

    HousingLean peopleRef: Sec. 3(3); Sec. 3(2)
  • The 80% AMI eligibility threshold excludes many who are cost-burdened but slightly above that level — in many counties, 80% AMI exceeds median rent for a mobile home lot, so those just above the cutoff face rising rents with no assistance.

    HousingRef: Sec. 4(6) (definition of low-income household); Sec. 3(1)(a)
  • The June 30, 2025 funding deadline creates uncertainty for program planning and may delay implementation — local agencies and nonprofits supporting tenants cannot reliably budget or hire staff ahead of July 1, 2025 start.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 7

Who Is Most Affected

  • Low-income mobile home park tenants aged 55+Positive Impact

    Low-income seniors in mobile home parks are the direct target group; the program provides meaningful but partial relief — enough to reduce rent burden significantly for many, but not fully offset rising costs, especially in high-rent counties.

  • Mobile home park ownersMixed Impact

    Park owners may see slightly reduced rent collection from participating tenants, but the program is designed to keep tenants in place — reducing turnover, vacancy, and potential legal/eviction costs. Net effect is likely neutral or slightly negative.

  • State government agencies (especially Department of Commerce)Mixed Impact

    Department of Commerce gains new administrative responsibilities but also new authority and funding — may strain current staff without additional resources, but could improve long-term capacity if properly funded.

  • Tenant and resident advocacy organizationsPositive Impact

    Tenant advocacy groups gain a new funding stream and statutory mandate for technical assistance — strengthens their role and reach, but may require new hiring and systems to handle application support.

  • Local governmentsMixed Impact

    Counties and local housing authorities may see reduced demand for emergency rental assistance and shelter services if this program prevents displacement — but they also bear costs of coordination and verification.

Sponsors

  • Representative Orcutt(Republican)District 20Primary
  • Representative Rude(Republican)District 16Secondary
  • Representative Klicker(Republican)District 16Secondary
  • Representative Eslick(Republican)District 39Secondary
  • Representative Jacobsen(Republican)District 25Secondary
  • Representative Ley(Republican)District 18Secondary
  • Representative Dufault(Republican)District 15Secondary
  • Representative Schmick(Republican)District 9Secondary
  • Representative Scott(Democrat)District 43Secondary
  • Representative Nance(Democrat)District 23Secondary