Skip to main content

HB 1314

Signed

House

Early learning facilities

Concerning the early learning facilities grant and loan program.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 14, 2025
Last Action: April 7, 2025
Status: C 21 L 25
Companion Bill:

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill updates Washington’s early learning facilities grant and loan program to expand access to funding for building, renovating, or purchasing early learning spaces. It clarifies eligibility, strengthens match fund flexibility, creates two dedicated state accounts, and adds emergency grant authority for urgent facility needs. The bill also updates how projects are prioritized to serve more children in high-need areas.

  • Creates and renames two state accounts—the Ruth LeCocq Kagi Early Learning Facilities Revolving Account and the Ruth LeCocq Kagi Early Learning Facilities Development Account—to fund grants and loans for early learning facility projects.
  • Expands eligibility to include school districts, tribal compact schools, and religiously affiliated entities, and clarifies that match funds are not required for applicants facing financial hardship.
  • Authorizes the Department of Commerce to contract with certified private-public partnerships (e.g., Community Development Financial Institutions-certified entities) to manage grants and loans for eligible organizations, and to award emergency grants for urgent health/safety needs (e.g., natural disasters).
  • Sets eligibility requirements: facilities must serve children 1 month to 12 years, projects must use the site for at least 10 years, and recipients must remain in good standing with the Early Achievers program (or repay grants).
  • Requires prioritization of projects based on unmet need, low-income areas, full-day/extended-day capacity, nutrition infrastructure, and geographic equity, and establishes a committee of experts to advise on this process.

Who is affected

  • Early learning providersEarly learning providers (e.g., child care centers, home-based programs) that serve children from 1 month to 12 years old and participate or seek to participate in state subsidy programs like Working Connections Child Care or the Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program.
  • School districts and tribal compact schoolsSchool districts and tribal compact schools that need funding to build, renovate, or purchase facilities to expand early learning capacity (e.g., full-day preschool).
  • Local governments and educational/community partnersLocal governments, community colleges, educational service districts, and housing developers that partner with early learning providers or develop facilities for early learning use.
  • Religiously affiliated entitiesReligiously affiliated organizations that operate licensed early learning programs and meet eligibility requirements.
  • TribesFederally recognized tribes in Washington that operate or plan to operate early learning facilities.
Effective: March 30, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill establishes two state accounts—the Ruth LeCocq Kagi Early Learning Facilities Revolving Account and the Ruth LeCocq Kagi Early Learning Facilities Development Account—to receive and disburse funds for grants and loans. Funding sources include legislative appropriations, bond proceeds, and repayments. The bill does not specify new funding amounts but allows the department to leverage match funds and administer programs with up to 4% of appropriations for administrative costs.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 6:50 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Expanding eligibility to include school districts, tribal compact schools, and religiously affiliated entities—while waiving match requirements for financially struggling applicants—directly increases access to facility funding for providers serving low-income children, especially in underserved rural and tribal communities.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 2, 43.31.569(1)(c)(ii); Sec. 5, 43.31.575(1)(h)-(i)
  • Mandating prioritization based on unmet need, low-income neighborhoods, nutrition infrastructure, and geographic equity ensures that new or expanded early learning capacity targets communities with the greatest gaps—particularly benefiting children in high-poverty areas who lack access to full-day or full-year programs.

    EducationPeopleRef: Sec. 8, 43.31.581(2)(a)-(f)
  • Authorizing the Department of Commerce to contract with CDFI-certified entities to manage grants and technical assistance expands capacity for small providers (e.g., home-based, faith-based) to navigate complex funding applications—reducing administrative barriers and increasing participation.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 4, 43.31.573(4)(a)(i)
  • Creating a standing emergency grant authority for urgent health/safety needs (e.g., natural disasters, structural hazards) enables rapid response to facility crises—protecting children and preserving early learning capacity during emergencies.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 4, 43.31.573(4)(A)-(B)
  • Establishing two dedicated state accounts—the Revolving and Development Accounts—creates a stable, ring-fenced funding stream for facility projects, enabling long-term planning and leveraging private/other public funds—particularly beneficial for providers seeking multi-year capital financing.

    FinancialPeopleRef: Sec. 2, 43.31.569(1)(c)(i); Sec. 2, 43.31.569(2)(c)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • The bill allows the department to waive match fund requirements for applicants experiencing financial hardship, but does not specify how 'financial hardship' is defined or verified—risking inconsistent application and potential exclusion of genuinely struggling providers who lack documentation, especially home-based or religiously affiliated providers without formal financial records.

    FinancialPeopleRef: Sec. 3, 43.31.571(4)
  • Eligibility requires participation in good standing with the Early Achievers quality rating and improvement system, which may disproportionately burden small, religiously affiliated, or rural providers who lack resources to meet complex compliance and reporting standards—effectively creating a de facto barrier to access for marginalized providers.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 5, 43.31.575(2)(a)
  • The requirement to contract with Certified Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) for grant administration may exclude rural or tribal providers who lack proximity to CDFI-certified partners, reducing equitable access and potentially consolidating technical assistance capacity in urban centers.

    Business & EmploymentLean peopleRef: Sec. 4, 43.31.573(4)(a)(ii)
  • Emergency grants are available for health/safety threats, but the bill does not define 'immediate' or 'unforeseen' clearly—risking delays in disbursement during crises (e.g., wildfire season) if administrative interpretation is overly cautious.

    Public SafetyLean peopleRef: Sec. 4, 43.31.573(4)(B)
  • While the bill allows match funds to include land or buildings, it does not clarify how non-cash contributions (e.g., donated land) are valued or verified—potentially favoring well-resourced developers over community-based or faith-based providers without legal or appraisal capacity.

    HousingLean peopleRef: Sec. 3, 43.31.571(4)

Who Is Most Affected

Small early learning providers (home-based, small centers)Positive Impact

Small and home-based early learning providers—especially those in rural or low-income areas—will benefit significantly from waived match requirements, emergency grants, and CDFI technical assistance. However, compliance with Early Achievers standards may pose administrative burdens for those without dedicated staff.

Tribes and tribal compact schoolsPositive Impact

Tribal compact schools and federally recognized tribes gain explicit eligibility and access to facility funding, supporting sovereignty over early learning infrastructure. However, remote or under-resourced tribes may still face barriers in accessing CDFI partners or meeting documentation requirements.

Religiously affiliated early learning providersMixed Impact

Religiously affiliated entities gain eligibility but must remain in good standing with Early Achievers—potentially requiring new compliance infrastructure. While this expands access, it may conflict with religious autonomy in curriculum or hiring, depending on implementation.

School districtsMixed Impact

School districts gain authority to apply for early learning facility funding, enabling expansion of full-day preschool. However, districts already well-resourced may outcompete smaller or rural districts for prioritized projects, potentially exacerbating inequities.

Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) and private partnersMixed Impact

CDFI-certified private-public partnerships gain new contracts and administrative roles, expanding their footprint in early learning infrastructure. However, smaller or rural CDFIs may lack capacity to serve all regions, potentially reinforcing urban-centric service delivery.

Sponsors

Representative Callan(Democrat)District 5Primary
Representative Abbarno(Republican)District 20Secondary
Representative Fosse(Democrat)District 38Secondary
Representative Davis(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Waters(Republican)District 17Secondary
Representative Reed(Democrat)District 36Secondary
Representative Salahuddin(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Tharinger(Democrat)District 24Secondary
Representative Nance(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Eslick(Republican)District 39Secondary
Representative Doglio(Democrat)District 22Secondary