Skip to main content

HB 1297

In Committee

House

Child support/self-employed

Reporting self-employed workers to the division of child support.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 13, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Civil R & Judi

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill expands child support enforcement to include self-employed and gig-economy workers by requiring businesses and platforms to report service providers who earn $600 or more annually and to withhold child support payments when ordered. It clarifies that such withholding does not create an employer-employee relationship and establishes penalties for noncompliance.

  • Requires service recipients (e.g., businesses, gig platforms) to report to the Washington State Support Registry when they hire or contract with a service provider for $600 or more in a calendar year, including the provider’s name, address, date of birth, and ID number.
  • Mandates that service recipients withhold child support payments from amounts owed to service providers when ordered by the Division of Child Support and remit withheld amounts to the registry within 7 days.
  • Imposes civil penalties of $25 per month (or $500 for intentional nonreporting or false reporting) on service recipients who fail to report eligible service providers.
  • Clarifies that service recipients must comply with income withholding orders and orders to withhold and deliver in the same way as employers, without creating an employer-employee relationship.
  • Expands the definition of 'earnings' to include payments to service providers and clarifies that income withholding applies to both traditional wages and payments to independent contractors.

Who is affected

  • Service recipients (e.g., businesses, gig platform operators)Business owners or organizations that hire independent contractors, gig workers, or platform-based service providers (e.g., ride-share drivers, food delivery workers, freelance contractors) and pay or contract to pay them $600 or more in a calendar year must now report those workers to the state support registry and may be required to withhold child support payments from amounts owed to them.
  • Service providers (e.g., gig workers, independent contractors)Independent contractors, gig workers, and other self-employed individuals who earn $600 or more annually from a single service recipient may have child support obligations enforced through income withholding from payments they receive, even though they are not legally considered employees.
  • Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (Division of Child Support)The Division of Child Support gains new authority to require reporting and withholding from non-traditional work arrangements, expanding its ability to locate and collect child support from self-employed or gig-economy workers.
  • Gig economy workersWorkers who receive income through digital platforms (e.g., Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, TaskRabbit) and are classified as independent contractors may now be subject to income withholding for child support, similar to traditional employees.
Effective: 2027-01-01Fiscal impact: The bill may increase state collections of child support by improving enforcement against self-employed and gig-economy workers, but the Department of Social and Health Services may incur administrative costs to implement reporting requirements and develop systems for tracking and processing reports.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 6:49 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Potential Benefits (4)
  • By requiring platforms and businesses to report and withhold child support from gig and self-employed workers, the bill improves enforcement of child support obligations—potentially increasing payments to children and families who currently fall through the cracks due to noncompliance by independent contractors. This is especially impactful in cases where workers underreport income or avoid traditional employment channels.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(6)(a); Sec. 2(6)(b); Sec. 3(12); Sec. 4(16)
  • The bill enhances the state’s ability to locate and track non-custodial parents who work in the gig economy or as independent contractors—groups historically difficult to enforce support orders against—by mandating reporting from service recipients. This improves the accuracy and completeness of the state’s child support enforcement database.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(a)(i); Sec. 2(1)(a)(ii); Sec. 2(3)
  • The bill includes a $500 penalty for intentional nonreporting or false reporting—creating a strong deterrent against collusion between service providers and recipients to evade child support enforcement, thereby improving compliance rates.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(7)(b); Sec. 5(5)
  • The bill explicitly clarifies that withholding does not create an employer-employee relationship—protecting gig platforms and service recipients from unintended legal liability under wage and hour laws, while still enabling enforcement of support obligations.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 2(8)(b); Sec. 3(12); Sec. 4(16)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Service recipients (including small businesses, gig platforms, and sole proprietors) must now report service providers and may be required to withhold child support payments, adding administrative burden and compliance risk—even for entities with no prior payroll or HR infrastructure. The $25/month penalty per service provider (or $500 for intentional noncompliance) disproportionately impacts micro-businesses and gig-platform users who lack compliance teams.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 2(1)(a)(ii); Sec. 2(5)(c)(iii); Sec. 2(7)(a)
  • The bill imposes new data collection and reporting obligations on service recipients, requiring collection of sensitive personal information (e.g., SSN, DOB) from independent contractors and transmission to a state registry—raising privacy and cybersecurity concerns for small businesses without robust data governance.

    Business & EmploymentIndustryRef: Sec. 2(1)(a)(i); Sec. 2(6)(a); Sec. 2(8)(b)
  • Service providers (independent contractors, gig workers) may face involuntary withholding of up to 50% of payments for child support without due process protections—e.g., no right to contest the underlying support order before withholding, and no statutory right to appeal the withholding itself before funds are remitted. This could cause short-term cash flow crises for low-income workers already struggling to meet obligations.

    FinancialPeopleRef: Sec. 2(6)(a); Sec. 2(6)(b); Sec. 2(8)(a)
  • The state will incur administrative costs to implement reporting infrastructure, develop compliance tracking systems, and process reports—costs likely passed through to local agencies or funded from general revenue, potentially diverting funds from other public services.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 2(8)(a); Sec. 2(8)(b); Sec. 2(9)
  • The bill expands state authority to intercept payments to independent contractors without creating an employer-employee relationship—effectively bypassing traditional due process safeguards that apply to wage garnishment for employees, raising constitutional concerns about deprivation of property without adequate notice or hearing.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(c)(i); Sec. 2(1)(c)(ii); Sec. 2(1)(c)(iii)

Who Is Most Affected

Gig economy workers and independent contractorsNegative Impact

Gig workers and independent contractors earning $600+ annually will be subject to income withholding without traditional employee protections. While this improves child support collection, it may cause cash flow instability for low-income workers—especially those already behind on support obligations. Impact is negative overall due to lack of procedural safeguards.

Small businesses and sole proprietorsNegative Impact

Small businesses, sole proprietors, and micro-enterprises that contract with service providers will face new reporting and withholding obligations. Though the bill includes a $25/month penalty (vs. $500 for fraud), compliance costs may be high relative to revenue for small operations. Impact is negative, especially for those without HR/payroll infrastructure.

Gig platform operatorsNegative Impact

Gig platforms (e.g., Uber, DoorDash) must now report drivers and may be required to withhold child support—adding compliance costs and operational complexity. While the bill shields them from employer-employee liability, the burden falls disproportionately on platforms with large numbers of low-earning drivers. Impact is negative.

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (Division of Child Support)Positive Impact

The Division of Child Support gains new enforcement authority and data sources, improving its ability to locate and collect support from nontraditional workers. This expands program effectiveness and may reduce long-term public costs from unpaid support. Impact is positive.

Children and custodial families receiving supportPositive Impact

Children and custodial families benefit from increased child support collections, especially those currently underserved due to noncompliance by self-employed or gig workers. This improves economic stability for vulnerable households. Impact is strongly positive.

Sponsors

Representative Walen(Democrat)District 48Primary
Representative Ormsby(Democrat)District 3Secondary
Representative Fey(Democrat)District 27Secondary
Representative Simmons(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Hill(Democrat)District 3Secondary