Skip to main content

HB 1204

In Committee

House

Senior shared housing

Concerning senior shared housing in manufactured home communities.

This status may be delayed. See Action History below for the latest updates.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: January 12, 2025
Last Action: January 12, 2026
Status: H Rules R

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill expands rights for seniors in Washington’s manufactured home communities by explicitly allowing them to have roommates—including through informal homesharing arrangements—and prohibits landlords from imposing certain fees or restrictive clauses. It also strengthens transparency and tenant protections around rent increases, park closures, and utility service during extreme heat.

  • Allows seniors (age 55+) in manufactured home communities to have at least one roommate—including through homesharing arrangements (e.g., cooking, cleaning, or gardening in exchange for rent or services)—as long as it doesn’t violate the community’s age restrictions.
  • Prohibits landlords from charging 'entrance fees' or 'exit fees' (except as part of a licensed continuing care contract), and bans rental agreements that require electronic-only rent payments or waive core tenant rights.
  • Requires landlords to include specific disclosures in rental agreements, including a bold, prominent warning about the possibility of park closure, the park’s current zoning, and the expiration date of any land use permits.
  • Mandates that landlords provide written notice to all tenants (at lease signing or renewal) that seniors may have a roommate, and prohibits landlords from denying this right.
  • Bars landlords from cutting off electricity or water service to a tenant during extreme heat events (per National Weather Service alerts), and requires reconnection upon request if service was cut for nonpayment—subject to a reasonable payment plan capped at 6% of the tenant’s monthly income.
  • Requires landlords to maintain common areas, utilities, and roads, and to provide clear information about utility hook-up responsibilities and 'for sale' sign rules.

Who is affected

  • Seniors (age 55+) in manufactured home communitiesResidents aged 55 or older who live in manufactured home communities (mobile home parks) gain the explicit right to have at least one roommate, including through formal or informal homesharing arrangements (e.g., exchanging chores or services for reduced rent).
  • Mobile home park landlords and property managersLandlords and park management must update rental agreements and policies to comply with new roommate and notice requirements, and are prohibited from charging certain fees or enforcing restrictive clauses.
  • Mobile home park tenants (all ages)Current and prospective tenants benefit from clearer rental agreement terms, stronger protections against unfair rent increases, and new transparency about park closure risks and utility responsibilities.
  • State and local government agencies (e.g., Department of Commerce, housing authorities)Local governments and housing agencies may need to support outreach and enforcement, especially around the new roommate and utility reconnection requirements.
Effective: July 28, 2025Fiscal impact: The bill may increase state administrative costs slightly due to enforcement and outreach responsibilities, but no significant new funding is required. Local governments may incur minimal costs for education and dispute resolution related to the new roommate and utility provisions.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 19, 2026 at 6:39 PM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for benefits

Potential Benefits (5)
  • Explicitly allowing seniors (age 55+) to have at least one roommate—including through informal homesharing arrangements (e.g., exchanging chores for reduced rent)—strengthens autonomy, combats social isolation, and supports aging in place for low- and moderate-income seniors who may otherwise be forced into institutional care due to unaffordable housing or lack of support networks.

    Rights & LibertiesPeopleRef: Sec. 1(2)(i) & Sec. 2(10) & Sec. 3(11)
  • Prohibiting utility shutoffs during extreme heat events and requiring reconnection upon request with a payment plan capped at 6% of monthly income protects seniors and other vulnerable residents from heat-related illness and death during increasingly frequent extreme heat waves—especially critical as climate change intensifies heat exposure risks in Washington.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 2(7)(a)-(c)
  • Mandating prominent disclosure of park closure risks, current zoning, and land use permit expiration dates empowers tenants to make informed decisions and plan for potential displacement—addressing a major source of housing instability in mobile home parks, where closure without notice has historically displaced entire communities.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 1(1)(h), (m), (n) & Sec. 1(2)(e)
  • Banning rental agreements that require electronic-only rent payments or waive core tenant rights protects seniors and low-income residents from digital exclusion and predatory contract terms—ensuring accessibility for those without reliable internet or banking access and reinforcing due process rights in eviction proceedings.

    Business & EmploymentPeopleRef: Sec. 1(2)(i) & Sec. 2(1)(5)(a)
  • Requiring landlords to maintain common areas, utilities, roads, and pest control—and to provide clear information about utility hook-up responsibilities—strengthens habitability standards in aging mobile home parks, many of which suffer from deferred maintenance and infrastructure decay, disproportionately affecting low-income seniors who have limited housing alternatives.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 2(1)(5)(a) & Sec. 3(2)-(5), (9)
Potential Concerns (5)
  • Prohibiting landlords from charging 'entrance fees' or 'exit fees' (except as part of a licensed continuing care contract) may reduce landlord revenue and limit flexible financing options for park development or resident relocation, potentially discouraging investment in aging parks or new developments—though the exemption for continuing care contracts suggests the restriction targets abusive fees, not all capital-raising mechanisms.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 1(2)(e) & Sec. 2(1)(5)(a)
  • Requiring landlords to disclose historical rent data and land use permit expiration dates increases transparency but imposes administrative burdens on small landlords and park operators, especially in parks with complex ownership histories or multiple permits—though the fiscal impact assessment estimates only minimal local government costs, the burden falls disproportionately on small-scale operators who lack legal or compliance staff.

    HousingRef: Sec. 1(2)(o) & Sec. 1(1)(m)-(n)
  • Prohibiting utility shutoffs during extreme heat alerts and requiring reconnection upon request may strain utility coordination and increase operational complexity for landlords, especially in rural parks where utility providers are third-party entities not directly controlled by the landlord—though the law includes a payment plan cap (6% of monthly income), enforcement may be inconsistent where landlords lack direct control over utilities.

    Public SafetyRef: Sec. 2(7)(a)-(c)
  • Mandating disclosure of park zoning and land use permit expiration dates may increase local government workload for verification and dispute resolution, especially in jurisdictions with high turnover in mobile home parks or complex land use histories—though the fiscal impact estimate says minimal cost, enforcement and complaint handling will fall to local housing authorities or code enforcement offices.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 1(2)(o) & Sec. 1(1)(m)-(n)
  • Requiring landlords to provide written notice of roommate rights at lease signing or renewal adds administrative steps and potential liability risk if notices are omitted or inaccurate—though the bill explicitly states no new funding is required, local housing agencies may need to conduct outreach or mediate disputes over noncompliance.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 3(11) & Sec. 1(2)(i)

Who Is Most Affected

Seniors (age 55+) in manufactured home communitiesPositive Impact

Seniors (age 55+) in manufactured home communities—especially low- and moderate-income individuals—are the primary beneficiaries: they gain legal protection to share housing with roommates (reducing isolation and cost), are shielded from utility shutoffs during heat emergencies, and receive clearer disclosures about park risks and rent terms. These protections directly support housing stability and health for a vulnerable population.

Mobile home park landlords and property managersMixed Impact

Mobile home park landlords—especially small-scale or family-owned operators—face new compliance costs (e.g., notice requirements, roommate accommodation, utility reconnection logistics) and revenue limitations (e.g., no entrance/exit fees, electronic-only payment ban). While large corporate operators may absorb these costs more easily, smaller operators may struggle with administrative burden and reduced flexibility in pricing or resident selection.

Mobile home park tenants (all ages)Positive Impact

All mobile home park tenants benefit from stronger transparency, anti-retaliation protections, and utility shutoff safeguards—though non-senior tenants do not gain the roommate right (which is age-specific). The rent increase restrictions and disclosure requirements improve predictability for all residents, but the roommate provision specifically advantages seniors.

State and local government agencies (e.g., Department of Commerce, housing authorities)Mixed Impact

State and local agencies (e.g., Department of Commerce, local housing authorities) will bear minimal but non-zero enforcement and outreach responsibilities—particularly around interpreting roommate rights, verifying utility reconnection compliance, and resolving disputes over disclosure accuracy. No major funding increase is required, but staff time will be needed for education and complaint handling.

Sponsors

Representative Eslick(Republican)District 39Primary
Representative Walen(Democrat)District 48Secondary
Representative Jacobsen(Republican)District 25Secondary
Representative Ryu(Democrat)District 32Secondary
Representative Leavitt(Democrat)District 28Secondary
Representative Macri(Democrat)District 43Secondary
Representative Obras(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Doglio(Democrat)District 22Secondary
Representative Gregerson(Democrat)District 33Secondary
Representative Peterson(Democrat)District 21Secondary
Representative Paul(Democrat)District 10Secondary
Representative Wylie(Democrat)District 49Secondary
Representative Kloba(Democrat)District 1Secondary
Representative Duerr(Democrat)District 1Secondary
Representative Nance(Democrat)District 23Secondary
Representative Timmons(Democrat)District 42Secondary
Representative Bernbaum(Democrat)District 24Secondary