Skip to main content
Evergreen Ledger

2SHB 1024

Signed

House

St. Edward state park

Concerning the leasing authority of the state parks and recreation commission at St. Edward State Park.

How does a bill become law?
  1. Introduced: The bill is filed and assigned a number.
  2. Committee: A subject-matter committee holds hearings, takes public testimony, and decides whether to advance the bill.
  3. Floor Vote: The full chamber (House or Senate) debates and votes on the bill.
  4. Opposite Chamber: The bill repeats the committee and floor vote process in the other chamber.
  5. Governor: The Governor reviews the bill and decides whether to sign or veto it.
  6. Signed: The bill has been signed into law.
Introduced: February 19, 2025
Last Action: April 7, 2025
Status: C 14 L 25
View Bill Text (HTML) (opens in new tab)View Bill Text (PDF) (opens in new tab)

AI Analysis

This analysis was generated by AI and may contain errors. It is not legal advice. Always refer to the official bill text for authoritative information.
People & CommunitiesPeople-leaningCorporate & Wealthy Interests

This bill allows the State Parks and Recreation Commission to lease parts of St. Edward State Park for up to 62 years if a state study finds no feasible public or nonprofit use. It updates lease approval rules to include this special exception while maintaining standard rules for other long-term leases.

  • Allows the State Parks and Recreation Commission to lease up to 62 years of specific parts of St. Edward State Park—including the main seminary building, pool building, gymnasium, and adjacent parking lots—if a state-funded study by the Department of Commerce finds no economically viable public or nonprofit use.
  • Requires a majority vote of five commission members to approve any lease over 20 years, including the special 62-year lease for St. Edward.
  • Clarifies that leases over 20 years (including the St. Edward lease) must follow the same voting rules as other long-term leases under state law.
  • Reaffirms that all leases must allow public access to scenic attractions and must be renegotiated every 5 years.

Who is affected

  • St. Edward State Park — The St. Edward State Park property and its facilities (including the main seminary building, pool building, gymnasium, and adjacent parking lots) may be leased long-term if no viable public or nonprofit use is found.
  • Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and Department of Commerce — State agencies and staff involved in managing parks may need to evaluate economic viability of uses for the park and potentially negotiate long-term leases.
  • Potential lessees (private or nonprofit organizations) — Private entities or nonprofits that might lease parts of the park if no public use is identified.
  • General public — General public may lose access to certain park areas if they are leased long-term to private or nonprofit operators.
Effective: March 30, 2025Fiscal impact: No direct fiscal impact identified; may reduce future state maintenance costs if a lease generates revenue, but could also reduce long-term public access and potential park revenue from day-to-day operations.
Model: Intel/Qwen3-Coder-Next-int4-AutoRoundGenerated: Mar 20, 2026 at 2:38 AM

Pro/Con Analysis

Stronger case for concerns

Potential Benefits (5)

  • If a private or nonprofit lessee develops the leased facilities (e.g., as a conference center, retreat, or educational campus), it could create local jobs and stimulate regional economic activity—though most high-wage positions may go to external operators rather than local residents.

    Business & EmploymentRef: Sec. 1, RCW 79A.05.025(2)(b) and Sec. 2, RCW 79A.05.030(5)(d)

  • Lease revenue could offset state maintenance costs and potentially support other park improvements, though the fiscal impact summary notes no direct fiscal benefit is expected and long-term revenue depends on lease terms and lessee viability.

    Local GovernmentRef: Sec. 2, RCW 79A.05.030(5)(d)

  • If a qualified nonprofit or public entity takes over operations of underused facilities, it may improve safety through consistent staffing, maintenance, and emergency response capacity—though this is speculative without performance standards or oversight requirements.

    Public SafetyRef: Sec. 1, RCW 79A.05.025(2)(b)

  • A well-regulated lease to a nonprofit or public entity could improve environmental stewardship through dedicated funding for trail maintenance, invasive species control, or habitat restoration—though the bill does not require such commitments.

    EnvironmentRef: Sec. 2, RCW 79A.05.030(5)(d)

  • Leasing to an educational or cultural nonprofit could expand public access to educational programming, internships, or youth programs—if the lessee voluntarily provides such services, which the bill does not mandate.

    EducationRef: Sec. 2, RCW 79A.05.030(5)(d)
Potential Concerns (5)

  • Long-term lease of park facilities—including seminary building, pool, gym, and parking lots—to private or nonprofit entities may reduce state oversight of safety, accessibility, and emergency response protocols, potentially compromising public safety during emergencies or routine park use.

    Public SafetyRef: Sec. 1, RCW 79A.05.025(2)(b)

  • The bill allows long-term leases (up to 62 years) with no requirement for public access to leased areas, and while it reaffirms scenic access, it does not guarantee access to leased buildings or parking lots—potentially restricting public use of key park infrastructure and degrading the public’s ability to safely navigate or use the park.

    Public SafetyPeopleRef: Sec. 1, RCW 79A.05.025(2)(b) and Sec. 2, RCW 79A.05.030(5)(d)

  • Leasing large portions of St. Edward State Park—including parking lots and buildings—to private or nonprofit lessees may lead to increased private vehicle traffic, altered landscaping, or reduced ecological monitoring, potentially harming local habitats and watershed integrity in the Puget Sound corridor.

    EnvironmentPeopleRef: Sec. 1, RCW 79A.05.025(2)(b)

  • By allowing long-term leases to private or nonprofit entities, the bill may enable conversion of publicly owned land into high-value private developments (e.g., luxury housing, conference centers), increasing pressure on regional housing markets and reducing long-term public land availability for affordable community uses.

    HousingPeopleRef: Sec. 1, RCW 79A.05.025(2)(b) and Sec. 2, RCW 79A.05.030(5)(d)

  • Local governments may lose influence over land-use decisions at St. Edward State Park, as the state parks commission can lease portions to third parties without requiring local input or environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), weakening local planning authority.

    Local GovernmentPeopleRef: Sec. 2, RCW 79A.05.030(5)(d)

Who Is Most Affected

General public, especially low- and middle-income residentsNegative Impact

The general public may lose consistent access to key park areas (e.g., parking lots, buildings) if leased to private or nonprofit operators, especially if access is restricted or收费 is introduced. This disproportionately affects low-income residents and families who rely on free public parks.

Local governments in the Lake Washington corridorNegative Impact

Local governments (e.g., King County, City of Medina) may lose influence over land-use decisions at a prominent regional park and face increased traffic or infrastructure strain if the lessee operates a high-traffic facility without local oversight.

Private developers and large nonprofitsPositive Impact

Potential lessees—especially large nonprofits, universities, or for-profit developers—could benefit from long-term, low-cost access to valuable waterfront property, potentially enabling high-value development or programming. The bill does not cap lease rates or require affordability commitments.

Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and Department of CommerceMixed Impact

State agencies (Parks and Commerce) gain flexibility to offload underutilized infrastructure and reduce maintenance burdens, but face reputational risk if leases lead to public backlash or loss of park integrity.

Existing park users and community organizationsNegative Impact

Existing park users—especially seniors, youth groups, and community organizations—may lose free or low-cost access to facilities like the gymnasium and pool if leased to entities that charge fees or restrict access.